Still Putin killed people intentionally since he had no such compelling reason to start this war and kill so many people. He had a simple easy option: just not start this war, so this is a big international crime and Russian dictatorship must be destroyed, the dictator must be jailed for life and Russia must be forcefully demilitarized and democratized like post-WWII Germany or Iraq was.
What, you never about Russian favorite children's cereal, "Vlad's Incinerated Wheaties"?
that is pretty funny. How do you know that the option to not proceed was 'easy". You think he did it for fun and laughs? You do realize that if NATO tries to carry out your plan is carried out we will all most likely be killed right? Man the intellect on this board seems to drop by the minute.
Your posts do really stupefy me.. Are you working for Putin's propaganda? It was easy not to start this war because Ukraine is a democratic European country which has never threatened Russia or whichever country and Ukraine's policy is integration with the EU. If the Russian dictator did not start that war, everything would be like it was before.
Nobody ever wanted to invade cunt mother russia. It is a frozen 18th century shit hole. Same ploy as when Czechoslovakia was poised to invade Germany.
That is very funny. There was a was a coup and then a civil war Don't pretend this was some normal european nation. Ethnic Russians were being attacked by the army. Ukraine ignored the unsc endorsed peace agreement they signed and were actively trying to undermine russias economic initiatives. They brought this war on themselves
Then why has it happened so many times. Have u ever opened a history book?
Your historical knowledge is about as good as your economic stewardship of Zimbabwe.I get it. He stopped the Czechoslovakian invasion in 1968. And all these attacks on RussiaThen why has it happened so many times. Have u ever opened a history book?
This is just a guess but:
You are making false statements. There was no coup in Ukraine since nobody seized power illegally. After the then president resigned as a result of mass protests all over the country, there were new presidential and parliamentary elections in which new president and parliament were legally elected with no nazi party present in the parliament or government. Looks like you just repeat Putin's nonsensical propaganda. There was never civil war in Ukraine, instead it was a disguised Russian invasion initiated by the disguised Russian military who of course also managed to recruit a few local sympathizers into their newly formed military groups which would not qualify to be the representation of the significant portion of the local population anyways since those groups were organized, financed and commanded by Russia. So you are making fake Russian propaganda statements:
"What about the US...what about Germany...Russia saved millions" ya the same Russia that connived with the Nazis,
The US invested heavily into NAZI Germany. Russia is not my favorite. I just reject the current narrative and the efforts create enmity with Russia and reject the narrative that its all Putins fault The facts tell me different.
Ahh yes, why were people from the US state dept there making decisions on Ukraines future? It was all done with external interference. THere was a civil war, civil wars often have outside actors. Putin feels Ukraine presents a threat to Russian security. If all you say is true, why did the UNSC as well as France and Germany endorse the Minsk accords. As for the so called "rules" the West has flouted these so many times, its not really a rule any more. How many nations has the West invaded since WWII vs USSR/Russia?
Why can't the US (or any other country) make foreign policy decisions as long as they conform to international laws and agreements? The main point here is whether the US breaks any international laws or agreements in its policy toward Ukraine or kills people in masses? Likewise, Ukraine decides on whether to accept the US policy or not again following international agreements.
I still don't understand how you claim to be anti war and are against US actions but not against this Russian aggression.
Laws are set 2 ways, by legislative or by precedent. If the west has refused to enforce the norms and accepted the US invasion of sovereign nations and assisted it, then the law that applies is the law of the jungle. Might is right. And this is where we are now. Russia felt threatened by Ukraine's evolution. They raised their concerns though diplomatic channels. They were rebuffed and we only left to act unilaterally on the risk they perceived.
