However if you have to fire off 90 times and need to hit someone 60 times, unless you are firing a pistol from 200 yards away I think there might be a wee issue with fire discipline.
One could fix that with some more training but then, but that gets all wrapped up with the militarization of the police, sadly much like prison sex, the militarization they need they ain't getting and the militarization they are getting they don't need.
One officer firing 90 times is excessive. Multiple cops firing 90 bullets in total is not, necessarily.
When you have very good reason to believe a suspect is armed and willing to shoot at you to kill you (because he already attempted to), you shoot until he's out for the count.
A man can be shot many times and still kill you. That's one thing Hollywood
does get right in their movies. The bad guy really can keep coming back.
Who would want to work with a colleague that thinks "only two shots per officer guys, there enough of us here so we're bound to hit him. That's how we should be trained. And if we don't, one of us might get killed but those are the breaks."
Someone willing to shoot at cops isn't some innocent schoolboy. He's a serious threat. The level of naivety seems boundless even when we see how dangerous these situations are on camera.
The police can never win. I remember last year or earlier this year when a cop shot and killed a female in a split second decision because the girl had a knife and was about to stab another female. The cop was run through hot coal by some members of the public. Yet if he did not shoot and the girl got stabbed those same people would blame the cop for not protecting her.