Explain.Someone more cynical would say the goalposts are being moved.
The wild card, maybe. They certainly didn't like that he was so pro-war in such a stupid way.Because he said the war in Iraq was a mistake. He was a wild card. They preferred the stability of a Bush or a Clinton.
Notice how careful that article you quoted is to avoid saying whether the USSS confirmed or denied the story.Neither the committee (full of lawyers) nor her even bothered to check the story which would have only required a phone call. This is same old, same old- toss shit at the wall and see how much will stick.
So someone has provided the sign in book and shown he wasn't there then?LOL! EVERYONE signs in and out of the White House- all is easily verifiable.
This has been the main suspicion of why she may have switched lawyers and the change in scheduling.
In JC's world, someone told someone who told someone who told someone who told a reliable, neutral and unbiased guy like Posobiec that he wasn't in the book and JC rushed to post it on the board.So someone has provided the sign in book and shown he wasn't there then?
I'm sure everyone in the rump crowd always signed in, always used WH email when they were supposed, never used encryption on their phone and almost never stole WH papers if they couldn't just burn them in the fireplace.So someone has provided the sign in book and shown he wasn't there then?
ROTFLMFAO!! That was her whole testimony- hearsay, except where she knowingly lied. Oh, yeah! False hearsay and you and the media swallowed it, although a high schooler could have had checked easily verifiable facts. This is a political theatre, alright. A third rate armature production doing the tour of pig shit villages in Arkansas.In JC's world, someone told someone who told someone who told someone who told a reliable, neutral and unbiased guy like Posobiec that he wasn't in the book and JC rushed to post it on the board.
Many in the general public might be expecting the 1/6 Committee to come up with something more substantive on Trump that would lead the DOJ to charge him. If the Committee is just exploring into the events of what led to the Capitol riot, fine. I'm not sure that's what the expectation is though.Explain.
Who is moving the goal posts? (And which goal posts are they moving?)
No one's swallowing hearsay except for you with Posobiec and his buds.ROTFLMFAO!! That was her whole testimony- hearsay, except where she knowingly lied. Oh, yeah! False hearsay and you and the media swallowed it, although a high schooler could have had checked easily verifiable facts. This is a political theatre, alright. A third rate armature production doing the tour of pig shit villages in Arkansas.
Doesn't he have immunity for acts done when president?Many in the general public might be expecting the 1/6 Committee to come up with something more substantive on Trump that would lead the DOJ to charge him. If the Committee is just exploring into the events of what led to the Capitol riot, fine. I'm not sure that's what the expectation is though.
Right now, it would appear the Committee has proved again that Trump is a loudmouth idiot. That's fine in my book too. I would like to see him retire from politics.
You will take "with the grain of salt" what people who were there say over what she heard second hand. You are styling yourself as a lawyer in here. ROTFLMFAO!No one's swallowing hearsay except for you with Posobiec and his buds.
I take the stuff that the security guy told her with a grain of salt. That said, no one's come forward with a competing version of the facts. (Posting on Twitter doesn't count btw).
And she lied?..... Okay, prove it. Bring forward witnesses who'll catch her out. What's that?.... It's not worth doing that because-because-because-because..... Okay, then I believe her because no other evidence.
One thing. Trump stood on the stage and called out Bush. The rest of the field stood by and refused to say the war was a mistake. Both then and after the first debate. And his numbers shot up and vintinued to do so. Trump was happy to throw shit at the wall and see what stuck. His rallies were a stream of randomness that when the crowd reacted he went with it. I said before it was like watching a Wrestling Shoot( first 20 minutes of Monday Night Raw). With some evangelical flavor thrown in.Explain.
Who is moving the goal posts? (And which goal posts are they moving?)
The wild card, maybe. They certainly didn't like that he was so pro-war in such a stupid way.
No one in the modern system wants to fight wars as mercenaries or do colonial "we invade and just take the oil and leave" stuff.
They don't want someone who says the problem is that the military doesn't commit enough war crimes.
The "Iraq was a mistake" thing, no one cared. Everyone was saying it was a mistake by 2016 and he was in favor of it in the beginning.
Even the "it was a mistake" bit was mostly "it was a mistake we stayed, we should have just stolen the oil".
Again, the argument that the contractors wouldn't want him is a strange one when he promised to expand the military and basically shovel money down their throats.
That the command staff might not have wanted him because he was unstable is at least plausible.
But the other people haven't come forward and testified..... right? And....You will take "with the grain of salt" what people who were there say over what she heard second hand. You are styling yourself as a lawyer in here. ROTFLMFAO!
oh, btw.
Former White House lawyer claims Cassidy Hutchinson did not write note to Trump on Jan. 6: Report - Washington Examiner
Two former Trump White House officials are claiming authorship of the same handwritten note that was presented as evidence in Tuesday's Jan. 6 committee hearing, according to a report. The note pertained to a statement intended for former President Donald Trump to release as his supporters...www.washingtonexaminer.com
That's a very, err..... "subjective" take on how it all happened. Are you sure that's how it happened and not just how Glenn Grunwald suggested it happened?One thing. Trump stood on the stage and called out Bush. The rest of the field stood by and refused to say the war was a mistake. Both then and after the first debate. And his numbers shot up and vintinued to do so. Trump was happy to throw shit at the wall and see what stuck. His rallies were a stream of randomness that when the crowd reacted he went with it. I said before it was like watching a Wrestling Shoot( first 20 minutes of Monday Night Raw). With some evangelical flavor thrown in.
But imo it was the Iraq War call out that made him. That is the turning moment to his numbers rightvafter the first TV debate.
The contractors, party bosses, media, and others couldn't pin him down. They had no idea what he would do in office. Thats what they hated most.
I'm not exactly sure. They could impeach him again. I'm not trying to be coy, but I'm never really sure what Congressional Committees are trying to accomplish.Doesn't he have immunity for acts done when president?
Oh, but they did.But the other people haven't come forward and testified..... right? And....
Hutchinson testified that she wrote the memo after Meadows handed her a notecard and pen and told her to take his dictation.
"That's a note that I wrote at the direction of the chief of staff on Jan. 6, likely around 3 o'clock," Hutchinson claimed at the hearing.
"And it's written on the chief of staff notecard, but that's your handwriting, Ms. Hutchinson?" Cheney asked, to which Hutchinson replied, "That's my handwriting."
Hutchinson added that Herschmann suggested changing the language to "without legal authority."
Herschmann had told the committee that he was the author of the note, according to the report.
A spokesperson for the Jan. 6 committee told ABC News that while Herschmann and Hutchinson "may have differing recollections of who wrote the note," the important thing is that "both White House officials believed that the president should have immediately instructed his supporters to leave the Capitol building."
Ok, let's see what the explanation is and what they said.Oh, but they did.
“Here’s the thing. The committee has Secret Service testimony that would seemingly corroborate or dispute what Cassidy Hutchinson said today, but it wasn’t played. Unclear why,” according to The Washington Post’s Josh Dawsey.
“Engel and Ornato have both testified to the committee behind closed doors, but their statements were not used in Tuesday’s hearing,” according to CNN.
ROTFLMFAO!! Yeah, they had to secure her lies. Thanks for the Canada Day laugh!!!Ok, let's see what the explanation is and what they said.
The fact that they're secret service agents suggests that there might be a security reason for a closed door hearing.