One mentally ill guy made a mistake and went after a scared child with an illegal weapon pretending to be a medic.
A few other people bravely tried to stop an active shooter who had already killed one person and was fleeing the crime site.
Kyle Rittenhouse solicits donations, so he can sue CNN and NYT
- Thread starter mandrill
- Start date
A few other people bravely tried to stop an active shooter who had already killed one person and was fleeing the crime site.
Again, what death penalty crime was he convicted of and who appointed that kid to do the execution. For that matter, is there even a hint of evidence that militia boy knew who he was killing? Do you really want to live in a world where killing people is allowed if it turns out they are 'debris'?
Kyle is human debris too.
I expressed my opinion that I consider him a killer who put himself in a situation of harm killed multiple people while pretending to be a tough guy. The jury (under local laws) said he was not guilty of first degree intentional homicide. That's why I use the term 'killer' instead of murderer.
And I find it disgusting that much of the US political spectrum is portraying this guy as a hero for being a dumb scared kid with a gun.
Again, being willing to take on a guy who just shot someone is both dumb and heroic. If someone unarmed person tried to take down the Uvalde or Buffalo shooters, they would be considered heroes, even if it was at their funeral.
Shoot first then check criminal records afterwards?
Death Wish wasn't supposed to make you want a country filled with vigilantes, certainly not teenage vigilantes with illegal weapons.
What does that have to do with your bs statement? Why can't you argue like an adult or a man?
Any sane non pedo would defend Kyle in the bigger picture. He legally defended himself. And he shot some pedos who were trying to hurt him in a country that allows people to carry rifles and use them if attacked. You could argue that shouldn't be allowed, but it is. You could argue that people like yourself and your pals aren't pedos, just minor attracted persons, but that would be bs. That is wrong. Period.
Why can't you agree to that?
He's a pedophile killer. Holds a higher status. He also killed 2 other dudes who tried to be tough guys. Huber and Rosenbaum both thought they were tough guys too when they were abusing children or women, all it took was a fat little wannabe cop teenager and they learned the extent of how tough they were. Open shut case. Get over it. I doubt Kyle will get rich.
So now Rittenhouse is this holy pedo seeker and destroyer?
Is that the new line, he wasn't just a teenager with a gun and a history of threats, or some kid pretending to be a medic or even a trespassing white supremacist security guard. Now Rittenhouse has a divine ability to sense and kill pedos? He could seek them out in a crowd and use his divine knowledge to kill?
That's the most fucked up thinking I've heard here in a while.
Honestly and seriously you should take this for what it is and let go. There was a riot, an altercation between some people; an armed man was attacked with the predictable result. The case went to trial and it was settled. I've been in demonstrations, sometimes very violent, and, believe me, the "victims " got a lot more justice in court than in most cases of mob violence that almost uniformly go uninvestigated and unpunished. There are no "winners" here. Let it go.
Oath Keepers, Proud Boys, KR, Patriot whatevers.
They are all the same, angry armed racists who think they are vigilantes out to quell unrest.
Why would anyone let that go?
I didn't say he belonged to one of them, just that he's part of the same movement.
What a great thing Rittenhouse did. Protecting business, helping injured. Quite possible saving future lives through the simple act of saving his own. Of course the frauds want to put an innocent man in jail because their criminal brownshirt equivalents were taken out.
The greatest travesty was that the DA decided to charge him, even though he had the video evidence in his possession. Why he decided to proceed with a loser case no one will know.
I assume this means you think all protesters should be allowed to take semi automatics to protests and shoot people if they get scared or think they might be a pedo.
In terms of guns, there are laws that vary by location. I would suggest following the law(if only those protesters were).
As for the self-defense of killing and maiming the protesters with violent criminal records that were obviously out to maim or kill......All within the law.
The Trump loving judge said self defence is a legit defence if you think your life is threatened.
So say there was a gang of white supremacists coming and some armed antifa or BLM felt their life was threatened, would this rationale apply to them as well?
How did he save lives, Czar? He was 16 years old. He had a gun that no sane country would let a kid wander around with. Instead of staying with the other right wing assholes who were chatting and playing hero with the cops a few yards away, KR was so naive and inexperienced that he roamed by himself into groups of people who were hostile. He was accosted by a recently released psych patient with a death wish who grabbed the gun and whom KR shot and killed. And then he was chased and assaulted by several people who were enraged and probably thought they would beat him and then present him to the cops as some type of citizens' arrest. He killed one and blew the arm away of a second.
It's legal self-defence, I agree. But it's the sort of sad and pointless macho idiocy that's only allowed in the US. None of those 3 people should have been shot that night. KR should not have been parading about with a gun. Neither should the dick head with a pistol who got shot. You think any of that is "heroic"?!
If some armed Antifa or BLM person has a gun legally(or even illegally) and is acting in a respectable manner(basically minding his own business(eg. wanting to help some people at a gay pride parade that had been threatened) and some people came after him with obvious intention to hurt(lets say just like in Kenosha), I would absolutely support their right to self =defense whether it was members of a white supremist group or some other people breaking the law with their intent to injure.
The fact that you would even ask the question makes me suspect that you have fraudulent double standards(as we see over and over) and would defend one but not the other. I am not a fraud. I believe in self-defense.
All three of them should have been shot that night. Admittedly, I can't prove that those three would have killed people in the future but the odds were extremely high that the three repeat violent offenders would have committed more violet crimes. Macho idiocy? I don't know what your definition is but if you think the US is the ONLY place where it is allowed....wrong again.
Being naive and young still gave him the right to kill. And he did.
Thank you Kyle. The frauds tried to ruin your life because you were naive but doing the right thing in your heart. Protect the innocent from the macho idiocy of the rioters.
IIRC, none of the 3 deceased were serious violent offenders. 1 guy had had a nervous breakdown and fought against being taken to a mental institution and had a minor assault conviction. The first guy killed also had a psychiatric history with depression. The pistol guy had a clean record IIRC.
You continually get your facts wrong.
