Last edited:
So how did that "Red Wave" turn out for you and your man Rogan, Orry?
Sounds like good news to me....
Some of the Trump cases will get somewhere. Most are political stunts. The lawsuit against Rittenhouse will go nowhere and is a political stunt.Yeah the reality is that this going nowhere just like the bogus Trump legal pursuits.
''Anthony Huber’s father, John Huber, also alleged that Rittenhouse, who was 17 at the time of the shootings, conspired with law enforcement to cause harm to protestors. ''
This is a true conspiracy theory lol........
Actually, no. The Hive is too busy laughing about the obvious grifting and cash-scamming that Rittenhouse and his handlers have done ever since he shot those 3 dudes and how we think that you and some of the other righties on here might have actually given Kyle your savings.Oh man,lol.......That's going to stir the hive up.
It does chap my ass that that little shit stain Rittenhouse escaped any real justice, but it's OK to be smug about the money...Actually, no. The Hive is too busy laughing about the obvious grifting and cash-scamming that Rittenhouse and his handlers have done ever since he shot those 3 dudes and how we think that you and some of the other righties on here might have actually given Kyle your savings.
Why would us hivers be smarting when we're chuckling?
Is it really horseshit though? You're a lawyer right, if a client walks in your office and tells you he gets acquitted of murder and wants to go after media personalities that called him a murderer on air....would you flat put tell a potential trial client t he has no case? Bias aside... it's a no?He can file any horseshit he wants. It may get a settlement that is barely worth the name, or get dismissed on a pre trial motion as legal nonsense. But he gets to file it and it lives in the court files for a little while. Yup.
If you're dreaming of crying 17 year olds with semi automatic weapons, you should talk to someone.That kid is more of a man you could ever dream to be.
Why don't you think this case will succeed?Some of the Trump cases will get somewhere. Most are political stunts. The lawsuit against Rittenhouse will go nowhere and is a political stunt.
But what happened to the Rittenhouse mega lawsuit against CNN that you formerly posted about repeatedly? You know, the lawsuit that was going to destroy the "Radical Left" and make the "Hive" weep and sob?
You posted about that a whole bunch, Orry. Whatever happened to that?
Did you give Kyle the Man some of your money, so you could look forward to the inevitable Day of Triumph?.... If I was to suggest to you that the little fucker cheated you and whole bunch of other people out of their bank balances, would you agree with me now?
I would say No. With the Freedom of the Press guaranteed under the 1st Amendment media outlets can say pretty much anything they like without consequence.Is it really horseshit though? You're a lawyer right, if a client walks in your office and tells you he gets acquitted of murder and wants to go after media personalities that called him a murderer on air....would you flat put tell a potential trial client t he has no case? Bias aside... it's a no?
US libel law protects the speaker pretty heavily.Is it really horseshit though? You're a lawyer right, if a client walks in your office and tells you he gets acquitted of murder and wants to go after media personalities that called him a murderer on air....would you flat put tell a potential trial client t he has no case? Bias aside... it's a no?
Because it's horseshit.Why don't you think this case will succeed?
But the burden of proof is so much lower in a civil case. In criminal, you need to prove without doubt someone is guilty. In the civil, you just need to have more than half of the doubt (or something...). That's why OJ won his criminal trial but lost the wrongful death. Self-defence could work, but at the same time you could make a reasonable argument that Rittenhouse coming to the city with a rifle led to the confrontations and shootings...A self fulfilling prophecy that there would be a need to use that gun....Because it's horseshit.
KR has a pretty strong self-defence claim and that works in civil law as well.
I don't think it makes a difference. The big advantage in civil cases usually happens when there's a "he said / she said" defence. In criminal cases, ANY REASONABLE DOUBT has to cause an acquittal. The standard Canadian self-instruction for trial judges in a criminal case is to recite that "even if the court believes the complainant, if the accused's evidence causes any reasonable doubt at all, I must acquit".But the burden of proof is so much lower in a civil case. In criminal, you need to prove without doubt someone is guilty. In the civil, you just need to have more than half of the doubt (or something...). That's why OJ won his criminal trial but lost the wrongful death. Self-defence could work, but at the same time you could make a reasonable argument that Rittenhouse coming to the city with a rifle led to the confrontations and shootings...A self fulfilling prophecy that there would be a need to use that gun....
A win for lawyers. Nothing will come of us.reality
![]()
Lawsuit can proceed against Kenosha shooter Kyle Rittenhouse
A federal judge in Wisconsin has ruled that a wrongful death lawsuit filed by the father of a man shot and killed by Kyle Rittenhouse during a protest in 2020 can proceed against Rittenhouse, police officers and others.apnews.com
Jesus Saves.
View attachment 207952