Amnesty International: Israel Apartheid

niniveh

Well-known member
Jun 8, 2009
1,315
468
83
February 1, 2022 9:00 amIsrael’s apartheid against Palestinians: a cruel system of domination and a crime against humanity
Israeli authorities must be held accountable for committing the crime of apartheid against Palestinians, Amnesty International said today in a damning new report. The investigation details how Israel enforces a system of oppression and domination against the Palestinian people wherever it has control over their rights. This includes Palestinians living in Israel and the Occupied Palestinian Territories (OPT), as well as displaced refugees in other countries.

The comprehensive report, Israel’s Apartheid against Palestinians: Cruel System of Domination and Crime against Humanity, sets out how massive seizures of Palestinian land and property, unlawful killings, forcible transfer, drastic movement restrictions, and the denial of nationality and citizenship to Palestinians are all components of a system which amounts to apartheid under international law. This system is maintained by violations which Amnesty International found to constitute apartheid as a crime against humanity, as defined in the Rome Statute and Apartheid Convention.

Amnesty International is calling on the International Criminal Court (ICC) to consider the crime of apartheid in its current investigation in the OPT and calls on all states to exercise universal jurisdiction to bring perpetrators of apartheid crimes to justice.

Our report reveals the true extent of Israel’s apartheid regime. Whether they live in Gaza, East Jerusalem and the rest of the West Bank, or Israel itself, Palestinians are treated as an inferior racial group and systematically deprived of their rights. We found that Israel’s cruel policies of segregation, dispossession and exclusion across all territories under its control clearly amount to apartheid. The international community has an obligation to act
Agnès Callamard, Amnesty International’s Secretary General
“There is no possible justification for a system built around the institutionalized and prolonged racist oppression of millions of people. Apartheid has no place in our world, and states which choose to make allowances for Israel will find themselves on the wrong side of history. Governments who continue to supply Israel with arms and shield it from accountability at the UN are supporting a system of apartheid, undermining the international legal order, and exacerbating the suffering of the Palestinian people. The international community must face up to the reality of Israel’s apartheid, and pursue the many avenues to justice which remain shamefully unexplored.”

Amnesty International’s findings build on a growing body of work by Palestinian, Israeli and international NGOs, who have increasingly applied the apartheid framework to the situation in Israel and/or the OPT.

Identifying apartheid

A system of apartheid is an institutionalized regime of oppression and domination by one racial group over another. It is a serious human rights violation which is prohibited in public international law. Amnesty International’s extensive research and legal analysis, carried out in consultation with external experts, demonstrates that Israel enforces such a system against Palestinians through laws, policies and practices which ensure their prolonged and cruel discriminatory treatment.

In international criminal law, specific unlawful acts which are committed within a system of oppression and domination, with the intention of maintaining it, constitute the crime against humanity of apartheid. These acts are set out in the Apartheid Convention and the Rome Statute, and include unlawful killing, torture, forcible transfer, and the denial of basic rights and freedoms.

Amnesty International documented acts proscribed in the Apartheid Convention and Rome Statute in all the areas Israel controls, although they occur more frequently and violently in the OPT than in Israel. Israeli authorities enact multiple measures to deliberately deny Palestinians their basic rights and freedoms, including draconian movement restrictions in the OPT, chronic discriminatory underinvestment in Palestinian communities in Israel, and the denial of refugees’ right to return. The report also documents forcible transfer, administrative detention, torture, and unlawful killings, in both Israel and the OPT.

Amnesty International found that these acts form part of a systematic and widespread attack directed against the Palestinian population, and are committed with the intent to maintain the system of oppression and domination. They therefore constitute the crime against humanity of apartheid.

The unlawful killing of Palestinian protesters is perhaps the clearest illustration of how Israeli authorities use proscribed acts to maintain the status quo. In 2018, Palestinians in Gaza began to hold weekly protests along the border with Israel, calling for the right of return for refugees and an end to the blockade. Before protests even began, senior Israeli officials warned that Palestinians approaching the wall would be shot. By the end of 2019, Israeli forces had killed 214 civilians, including 46 children.

In light of the systematic unlawful killings of Palestinians documented in its report, Amnesty International is also calling for the UN Security Council to impose a comprehensive arms embargo on Israel. This should cover all weapons and munitions as well as law enforcement equipment, given the thousands of Palestinian civilians who have been unlawfully killed by Israeli forces. The Security Council should also impose targeted sanctions, such as asset freezes, against Israeli officials most implicated in the crime of apartheid.

Palestinians treated as a demographic threat

Since its establishment in 1948, Israel has pursued a policy of establishing and then maintaining a Jewish demographic majority, and maximizing control over land and resources to benefit Jewish Israelis. In 1967, Israel extended this policy to the West Bank and Gaza Strip. Today, all territories controlled by Israel continue to be administered with the purpose of benefiting Jewish Israelis to the detriment of Palestinians, while Palestinian refugees continue to be excluded.

Amnesty International recognizes that Jews, like Palestinians, claim a right to self-determination, and does not challenge Israel’s desire to be a home for Jews. Similarly, it does not consider that Israel labelling itself a “Jewish state” in itself indicates an intention to oppress and dominate.

However, Amnesty International’s report shows that successive Israeli governments have considered Palestinians a demographic threat, and imposed measures to control and decrease their presence and access to land in Israel and the OPT. These demographic aims are well illustrated by official plans to “Judaize” areas of Israel and the West Bank, including East Jerusalem, which continue to put thousands of Palestinians at risk of forcible transfer.

Oppression without borders

The 1947-49 and 1967 wars, Israel’s ongoing military rule of the OPT, and the creation of separate legal and administrative regimes within the territory, have separated Palestinian communities and segregated them from Jewish Israelis. Palestinians have been fragmented geographically and politically, and experience different levels of discrimination depending on their status and where they live.

Palestinian citizens in Israel currently enjoy greater rights and freedoms than their counterparts in the OPT, while the experience of Palestinians in Gaza is very different to that of those living in the West Bank. Nonetheless, Amnesty International’s research shows that all Palestinians are subject to the same overarching system. Israel’s treatment of Palestinians across all areas is pursuant to the same objective: to privilege Jewish Israelis in distribution of land and resources, and to minimize the Palestinian presence and access to land.

Amnesty International demonstrates that Israeli authorities treat Palestinians as an inferior racial group who are defined by their non-Jewish, Arab status. This racial discrimination is cemented in laws which affect Palestinians across Israel and the OPT.

For example, Palestinian citizens of Israel are denied a nationality, establishing a legal differentiation from Jewish Israelis. In the West Bank and Gaza, where Israel has controlled the population registry since 1967, Palestinians have no citizenship and most are considered stateless, requiring ID cards from the Israeli military to live and work in the territories.

Palestinian refugees and their descendants, who were displaced in the 1947-49 and 1967 conflicts, continue to be denied the right to return to their former places of residence. Israel’s exclusion of refugees is a flagrant violation of international law which has left millions in a perpetual limbo of forced displacement.

Palestinians in annexed East Jerusalem are granted permanent residence instead of citizenship – though this status is permanent in name only. Since 1967, more than 14,000 Palestinians have had their residency revoked at the discretion of the Ministry of the Interior, resulting in their forcible transfer outside the city.

Lesser citizens

Palestinian citizens of Israel, who comprise about 19% of the population, face many forms of institutionalized discrimination. In 2018, discrimination against Palestinians was crystallized in a constitutional law which, for the first time, enshrined Israel exclusively as the “nation state of the Jewish people”. The law also promotes the building of Jewish settlements and downgrades Arabic’s status as an official language.

The report documents how Palestinians are effectively blocked from leasing on 80% of Israel’s state land, as a result of racist land seizures and a web of discriminatory laws on land allocation, planning and zoning.

The situation in the Negev/Naqab region of southern Israel is a prime example of how Israel’s planning and building policies intentionally exclude Palestinians. Since 1948 Israeli authorities have adopted various policies to “Judaize” the Negev/Naqab, including designating large areas as nature reserves or military firing zones, and setting targets for increasing the Jewish population. This has had devastating consequences for the tens of thousands of Palestinian Bedouins who live in the region.

Thirty-five Bedouin villages, home to about 68,000 people, are currently “unrecognized” by Israel, which means they are cut off from the national electricity and water supply and targeted for repeated demolitions. As the villages have no official status, their residents also face restrictions on political participation and are excluded from the healthcare and education systems. These conditions have coerced many into leaving their homes and villages, in what amounts to forcible transfer.

Decades of deliberately unequal treatment of Palestinian citizens of Israel have left them consistently economically disadvantaged in comparison to Jewish Israelis. This is exacerbated by blatantly discriminatory allocation of state resources: a recent example is the government’s Covid-19 recovery package, of which just 1.7% was given to Palestinian local authorities.

Dispossession

The dispossession and displacement of Palestinians from their homes is a crucial pillar of Israel’s apartheid system. Since its establishment the Israeli state has enforced massive and cruel land seizures against Palestinians, and continues to implement myriad laws and policies to force Palestinians into small enclaves. Since 1948, Israel has demolished hundreds of thousands of Palestinian homes and other properties across all areas under its jurisdiction and effective control.

As in the Negev/Naqab, Palestinians in East Jerusalem and Area C of the OPT live under full Israeli control. The authorities deny building permits to Palestinians in these areas, forcing them to build illegal structures which are demolished again and again.

In the OPT, the continued expansion of illegal Israeli settlements exacerbates the situation. The construction of these settlements in the OPT has been a government policy since 1967. Settlements today cover 10% of the land in the West Bank, and some 38% of Palestinian land in East Jerusalem was expropriated between 1967 and 2017.

Palestinian neighbourhoods in East Jerusalem are frequently targeted by settler organizations which, with the full backing of the Israeli government, work to displace Palestinian families and hand their homes to settlers. One such neighbourhood, Sheikh Jarrah, has been the site of frequent protests since May 2021 as families battle to keep their homes under the threat of a settler lawsuit.

Draconian movement restrictions

Since the mid-1990s Israeli authorities have imposed increasingly stringent movement restrictions on Palestinians in the OPT. A web of military checkpoints, roadblocks, fences and other structures controls the movement of Palestinians within the OPT, and restricts their travel into Israel or abroad.

A 700km fence, which Israel is still extending, has isolated Palestinian communities inside “military zones”, and they must obtain multiple special permits any time they enter or leave their homes. In Gaza, more than 2 million Palestinians live under an Israeli blockade which has created a humanitarian crisis. It is near-impossible for Gazans to travel abroad or into the rest of the OPT, and they are effectively segregated from the rest of the world.

For Palestinians, the difficulty of travelling within and in and out of the OPT is a constant reminder of their powerlessness. Their every move is subject to the Israeli military’s approval, and the simplest daily task means navigating a web of violent control
Agnès Callamard
“The permit system in the OPT is emblematic of Israel’s brazen discrimination against Palestinians. While Palestinians are locked in a blockade, stuck for hours at checkpoints, or waiting for yet another permit to come through, Israeli citizens and settlers can move around as they please.”

Amnesty International examined each of the security justifications which Israel cites as the basis for its treatment of Palestinians. The report shows that, while some of Israel’s policies may have been designed to fulfil legitimate security objectives, they have been implemented in a grossly disproportionate and discriminatory way which fails to comply with international law. Other policies have absolutely no reasonable basis in security, and are clearly shaped by the intent to oppress and dominate.

The way forward

Amnesty International provides numerous specific recommendations for how the Israeli authorities can dismantle the apartheid system and the discrimination, segregation and oppression which sustain it.

The organization is calling for an end to the brutal practice of home demolitions and forced evictions as a first step. Israel must grant equal rights to all Palestinians in Israel and the OPT, in line with principles of international human rights and humanitarian law. It must recognize the right of Palestinian refugees and their descendants to return to homes where they or their families once lived, and provide victims of human rights violations and crimes against humanity with full reparations.

The scale and seriousness of the violations documented in Amnesty International’s report call for a drastic change in the international community’s approach to the human rights crisis in Israel and the OPT.

All states may exercise universal jurisdiction over persons reasonably suspected of committing the crime of apartheid under international law, and states that are party to the Apartheid Convention have an obligation to do so.

The international response to apartheid must no longer be limited to bland condemnations and equivocating. Unless we tackle the root causes, Palestinians and Israelis will remain locked in the cycle of violence which has destroyed so many lives
Agnès Callamard
“Israel must dismantle the apartheid system and start treating Palestinians as human beings with equal rights and dignity. Until it does, peace and security will remain a distant prospect for Israelis and Palestinians alike.”

Please see the full report for detailed definition of apartheid in international law.

For more information please contact
press@amnesty.org
 

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
91,744
22,210
113
Amnesty International provides numerous specific recommendations for how the Israeli authorities can dismantle the apartheid system and the discrimination, segregation and oppression which sustain it.

The organization is calling for an end to the brutal practice of home demolitions and forced evictions as a first step. Israel must grant equal rights to all Palestinians in Israel and the OPT, in line with principles of international human rights and humanitarian law. It must recognize the right of Palestinian refugees and their descendants to return to homes where they or their families once lived, and provide victims of human rights violations and crimes against humanity with full reparations.
Good on Amnesty, they join Human Rights Watch, B'tselem, the UN and Yesh Din in calling Israel by the correct label.
Apartheid.

Israel has been warned for decades by its own leaders that it was heading down this road, they chose the path and now its time for the international community to fix the problem they won't.
End apartheid.

Boycotts, sanctions and BDS.


 

saxon

Well-known member
Dec 2, 2009
4,759
520
113
As long as America has their backs they can do whatever they want.
 

canada-man

Well-known member
Jun 16, 2007
31,985
2,899
113
Toronto, Ontario
canadianmale.wordpress.com
Israel defenders slam Amnesty International over ‘diplomatic lynch against the Jewish state’


Foreign Minister Yair Lapid says new report calling Israel an “apartheid state” shows that Amnesty is “another radical organization that echoes propaganda with no serious examination. Instead of seeking facts, Amnesty quotes lies spread by terrorist organizations.”


(January 31, 2022 / JNS) A new report by Amnesty International UK set to be published on Feb. 1 accuses Israel of “apartheid” and “institutionalized and systematic discrimination against Palestinians.” Amnesty said it has “concluded that Israel has perpetrated the international wrong of apartheid as a human-rights violation and a violation of public international law.”

The report accuses “almost all of Israel’s civilian administration and military authorities, as well as governmental and quasi-governmental institutions” as being involved “in the enforcement of the system of apartheid against Palestinians across Israel and the OPT [Occupied Palestinian Territories] and against Palestinian refugees and their descendants outside the territory.”


Israeli Foreign Minister Yair Lapid was quick to condemn the report in a press release on Monday. He said Amnesty is “another radical organization that echoes propaganda with no serious examination. Instead of seeking facts, Amnesty quotes lies spread by terrorist organizations.”

He said the accusations against Israel are “a delusion divorced from reality.”

“Israel is not perfect, but it is a democracy committed to international law and open to scrutiny, with a free press and strong Supreme Court,” said Lapid, noting that Amnesty does not make the same accusation against Syria “an ‘apartheid state’—a country whose government murdered half a million of its own citizens—nor Iran, or any other corrupt and murderous regime in Africa or Latin America.”


“I hate to use the argument that if Israel were not a Jewish state, nobody in Amnesty would dare argue against it, but in this case, there is no other possibility,” he said.
The organization said it has based its findings on decades of field research “collecting evidence of violations of international human rights and humanitarian law in Israel and the OPT, and on publications by Palestinian, Israeli and international organizations in addition to academic studies, monitoring by grassroots activist groups, reports by U.N. agencies, experts and human rights bodies and media articles.”
The report, titled “Israel’s Apartheid Against Palestinians: Cruel System of Domination and Crime Against Humanity,” accuses Israel of “institutionalized segregation and discrimination against Palestinians, as a racial group, in all areas under its control amounts to a system of apartheid, and a serious violation of Israel’s human-rights obligations.”
Amnesty UK is not the only organization to accuse Israel of apartheid.
In April, Human Rights Watch released a similar 213-page report titled, “A Threshold Crossed,” which accused Israel of committing crimes against humanity—namely, of apartheid and persecution.
That report also came under heavy criticism for its anti-Israel bias, ignoring of Palestinian rejectionism, downplaying the complexities of the Arab-Israeli conflict and the application of double standards when discussing Israel.
‘Clearly timed to exploit lawfare initiatives’
Gerald Steinberg, president of NGO Monitor said, “For 20 years, Amnesty International has been a leader in NGO campaigns to demonize Israel, based on twisting and exploiting the evils of the South African apartheid regime in order to promote hatred. This false and immoral agenda singling out the nation-state of the Jewish people is a major cause of 21st-century anti-Semitism and is the polar opposite of the universal principles embodied in real human rights. This campaign is also a betrayal of everything that Peter Benenson, the founder of Amnesty, stood for.”
Anne Herzberg, NGO Monitor’s legal adviser added: “Amnesty’s report offers nothing new to the discussion. It is simply part of the discriminatory and offensive campaign launched in 2021, by NGOs like HRW and B’Tselem, which is based on invented law and discriminatory tropes from a century’s worth of anti-Semitic propaganda. It is clearly timed to exploit lawfare initiatives at the dictator-run U.N. Human Rights Council such as the Commission of Inquiry on the 2021 conflict.”
According to NGO Monitor, the publication “breaks no new ground and is not meaningfully different from the discredited Human Rights Watch (HRW) and B’Tselem reports from 2021, yet Amnesty says they took over four years to produce it.”
NGO Monitor also accused Amnesty of whitewashing and downplaying “the history of extreme violence directed at Israeli civilians by Palestinian terrorist organizations, including the anti-Jewish riots during the [May] 2021 conflict [with Hamas in Gaza]. Fittingly, the only mentions of the word ‘terrorist’ in the entire document utilize scare quotes for paraphrases or quotations of Israeli sources.”
The research institute also noted that the report’s release “is timed to bolster a forthcoming March 2022 report from U.N. Special Rapporteur Michael Lynk that will advance similar allegations, and influence the U.N. Human Rights Council’s Commission of Inquiry.”
“Amnesty’s recommendations are a clear call for the elimination of Israel,” said NGO Monitor.
‘Pour more oil on the fire of anti-Semitism’
Israel’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs said in a statement that the report “consolidates and recycles lies, inconsistencies and unfounded assertions that originate from well-known anti-Israeli hate organizations, all with the aim of reselling damaged goods in new packaging. Repeating the same lies of hate organizations over and over does not make the lies reality, but rather makes Amnesty illegitimate.”
Foreign Ministry spokesman Lior Hayat said in an online conference on Monday that Amnesty “never contacted us to ask our opinion on any information in the report. This shows the true goal of Amnesty, and they unfortunately lost their way.”
“This is a purely anti-Semitic report,” he charged. “This report will pour more oil on the fire of anti-Semitism taking place in the streets of Europe and America.”
The ministry’s statement added that the report “denies the State of Israel’s right to exist as the nation-state of the Jewish people. Its extremist language and distortion of historical context were designed to demonize Israel and pour fuel onto the fire of anti-Semitism.”
It called on Amnesty to “withdraw from the report which is set to be published.”

Arsen Ostrovsky, chair and CEO of the International Legal Forum, told JNS that like the HRW report, this latest one “is just the latest intensified attack in these organizations’ longstanding and relentless campaign of lawfare and vilification against the State of Israel.”
Calling the report “one-sided, libelous and baseless,” Ostrovsky called on Amnesty UK, “which has been beleaguered by charges of institutionalized racism,” to get “its own house in order first, before lecturing Israel.”
Ostrovsky lambasted Amnesty for its blatant call to dismantle the Jewish state and for writing a report that is “replete with malicious lies, gross distortions of truth and fabrications of law while peddling unhinged hate, incitement and racism.”
“There is nothing new in Amnesty’s sudden discovery of the word ‘apartheid,’ in relation to Israel,” said European Jewish Congress president Moshe Kantor. “They are in lock-step with anti-Israel and anti-Semitic activists in a coordinated diplomatic lynch against the Jewish state, and the mere concept of Jewish self-determination and collectivity.”

B’nai B’rith International president Seth Riklin and CEO Daniel S. Mariaschin also condemned the report in a statement, saying, “The reality is that Israeli Arabs sit in Israel’s current government and on Israel’s Supreme Court. They have the same right to vote as all Israelis. They have their own media. Arabic is an official language of Israel. Amnesty’s libelous claim of ‘apartheid’ is simply baseless.”
The Conference of Presidents of Major American Jewish Organizations, Anti-Defamation League, American Israel Public Affairs Committee, American Jewish Committee, B’nai B’rith International and the Jewish Federations of North America issued a statement rejecting the report, saying it “presents an unbalanced, inaccurate, and incomplete review and instead inexplicably focuses on one aim: to demonize and delegitimize the Jewish and democratic State of Israel.”

The organizations accused Amnesty of committing “a double injustice: It fuels those anti-Semites around the world who seek to undermine the only Jewish country on earth, while simultaneously cheapening and downplaying the horrific suffering that was a result of apartheid in South Africa.”

The statement said the report “disregards the fact that Israel’s robust democracy grants its Arab citizens full rights and equality, includes an Arab Muslim nationalist party in Israel’s governing coalition, as well as a history of senior Israeli Arab governmental officials, including Supreme Court justices, government ministers, high-level diplomats, military officers and members of Knesset.”

Ronald S. Lauder, president of the World Jewish Congress, also sharply criticized the report, saying: “By issuing this one-sided and blatantly politicized report which totally ignores both Palestinian acts of terrorism and Israel’s obligation to defend its citizens against such terrorism, Amnesty International UK is consciously participating in the ongoing insidious campaign to demonize the State of Israel.”


Israel defenders slam Amnesty International over ‘diplomatic lynch against the Jewish state’ (jns.org)
 

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
91,744
22,210
113
As long as America has their backs they can do whatever they want.
For a while.
I would expect there is going to be serious pressure here with our government to start sanctions.
This is the biggest of the human rights organizations, you can't ignore them and claim to be moral.
 

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
91,744
22,210
113
So you think Amnesty is 100% authoritative when they criticize Israel yet argue against them when the say Jews in the West Bank are civilians?
I'm willing to support full investigations by the ICC based on all allegations on both sides.
If you're willing to accept their reports in full as well, we can discuss all allegations.

But we know you're in denial.
You've been watching Israel become apartheid for years here and now you're stuck with it.
Bring on the boycotts and sanctions.

 

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
91,744
22,210
113
You mean actually listening to what Palestinians say? Polling of refugees and people under UNRWA care says a single digit percentage would want to become Israeli in a Two State peace. Similarly, a single digit percentage of Palestinians prefer a One State peace. Not to mention that one of the Palestinian governments outright rejects any permanent peace that includes Jews in the region.

Typical western elitist telling non-white people what they should hope for.
Its time to amalgamate these threads, they are too repetive.
Its also too late for this argument.

The de facto one state, apartheid solution is here.
And the only way we can end it is through boycotts and sanctions.
Like we did for South Africa.

End apartheid.
 

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
91,744
22,210
113
You have used it thousands of times to describe actions by Jews but when it comes to Palestinians (or any other anti-Israel group), you don't like to use it
Why do you refuse to use the same terminology for Palestinians throwing rocks as you do for Jews throwing rocks?
Yet instead of condemning Palestinians who do that you call it self defense.
Accusations of 'terrorism' do not excuse apartheid.
Take those accusations to the ICC, since Israel's apartheid legal system isn't trustworthy.
The ICC and the UN will have to end apartheid and apply the law.

 

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
91,744
22,210
113
How many times do I have to do this?

Israeli settlements in the Occupied Territories are unlawful under the provisions of international humanitarian law. The Fourth Geneva Convention prohibits the transfer of civilians from the occupying power’s territory into the occupied territory (Article 49 (6)). However, the unlawful status of Israeli settlements does not affect the civilian status of settlers. Settlers, like any other civilians, cannot be targeted and only lose their protection from attack if and for such time as they take a direct part in hostilities (Article 51 (3) Protocol 1).



And how hypocritical are you to be posting explicitly about protecting civilians in one thread while trying to argue that Jewish civilians aren't really civilians.
How many times do I have to agree with both Amnesty saying they are civilians when they act as civilians while noting that B'tselem noted 450 attacks over the last 2 years where they were backed by the IDF where they were as Amnesty says 'taking a direct part in the hostilities'. Even you have stated that in those cases you believe settlers are 'terrorists' and Palestinians have the right to self defence over them.
This is in line with Amnesty, HRW, B'stelem and your posts.

And while you are on record here saying you stand by the work of Amnesty, lets get back on topic and listen to Amnesty.

 

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
91,744
22,210
113
You blatantly using a double standard and applaud them when they criticize one side and ignore them when they criticize the other shows you think they're not truly trustworthy.
Feel free to post which statements of Amnesty's that you think I disagree with.
And I'll gladly prove you wrong and show that the only person here attacking them is you.

 

y2kmark

Class of 69...
May 19, 2002
19,064
5,442
113
Lewiston, NY
Who new Amnesty International was anti Semitic?...
 

niniveh

Well-known member
Jun 8, 2009
1,315
468
83
Now everybody is.
Its the new IHRA definition, anyone who doesn't love apartheid....
ISRAEL
THE ART OF TORPEDOING CRITICISM
LAURA-JULIE PERREAULTTHE PRESS
“Israel is not perfect, but it is a democracy committed to international law, open to criticism. This sentence from Yair Lapid, Minister of Foreign Affairs of Israel, is a jewel of irony.
The head of Israeli diplomacy issued the message on Monday just as he was trying to prevent the publication of an Amnesty International report, calling it "anti-Semitic".
In the document, released Tuesday, the human rights organization details for 211 pages how the Middle Eastern country violates international law by imposing a "system of oppression and domination on the Palestinian people wherever they controls his rights.
Through examples, touching on access to property, the right to dissent, the justice system or even democratic representation, the Amnesty report affirms that all Palestinians - whether they are citizens of Israel or whether they rather live in the occupied territories or in refugee camps in neighboring countries - are subject to the "system whose objective is to favor Israeli Jews in the distribution of land and resources, and to minimize the presence of the Palestinian population and its access to land”.

At the end of the analysis which mobilized a team of a dozen researchers for four years, Amnesty concludes that Israel is committing the "crime of apartheid", a crime against humanity, and asks the International Criminal Court to investigate this.
Director General of the French Canadian section of Amnesty, France-Isabelle Langlois, who was consulted in the process of writing the report, notes that every word of the document was weighed. “This report should in no way be construed as a charge against Jews or Israel's right to exist. An organization like ours does not want to add grist to the mill of the anti-Semitic and fascistic tendencies that we observe. This report talks about what the Palestinians go through on a day-to-day basis. We have to name it, say it and continue to put pressure on it. There are activists and citizens in Israel who are also fighting against these violations,” notes Ms. Langlois.
Amnesty is not alone in its camp. Last April, the organization Human Rights Watch, in a very detailed report on Israel and the occupied territories, came to a similar conclusion and used the same term: crime of apartheid.
***
Apartheid? Let's be clear, this accusation is not trivial. The term evokes the South African regime which relentlessly oppressed “black” and “colored” populations for the benefit of whites from 1948 to 1991.
However, a distinction must be made between this authoritarian regime and the crime of apartheid, which has been recognized in international law since the 1960s.
This crime is defined as a set of serious violations of human rights with the aim of maintaining the domination of one racial group over another through discriminatory laws, policies and practices.
The same legal concept is found in the Rome Statute, which defines the jurisdiction of the International Criminal Court, located in The Hague. This court can investigate and try individuals accused of the most serious crimes, which include genocide, war crimes and crimes against humanity.
To date, no one has been tried for apartheid crimes.
***
Under these circumstances, it is no wonder that Israel does not react very well to the accusation. One cannot forget that the country was created to give a state to the Jewish people after the Holocaust and the unparalleled persecutions of the Second World War. A State carrying with it the promise of the protection of a population too long subjected to discriminatory laws and anti-Semitism in Europe and elsewhere. A state that has to deal with a difficult, even hostile and undemocratic neighborhood.
In its original concept, Israel was to be the reverse of apartheid. The reports of Human Rights Watch and Amnesty therefore attack the spinal cord of the Jewish state, and that hurts.
In Canada, we also saw an outcry when the country was accused of “cultural genocide” by the Truth and Reconciliation Commission which looked into residential schools for Aboriginals. There too, the report is hard, but the government nevertheless took note of the conclusions and started a process of reconciliation which promises to be long and difficult.
And that is also what the Israeli government and its staunch allies should do today: take note of the demonstration of wrongs done to them, analyze it with a cool head and work to improve the situation. Drastically.
At least, that is what “a democracy committed to international law, open to criticism” should do.
"Crimes against humanity", according to Amnesty
In its report, Amnesty denounces a set of discriminatory measures, but considers that some of them amount to crimes against humanity. Extracts.
DEPORTATION AND FORCED TRANSFERS
“Since 1948, Israel has destroyed tens of thousands of Palestinian homes and other properties in all areas under its jurisdiction and control. Those affected are often the poorest and most marginalized communities in Israel and Palestinian society. »
ARBITRARY DETENTION
“Since the occupation of the West Bank and Gaza Strip in 1967, Israeli authorities have used administrative detention extensively to imprison thousands of Palestinians, including children, without charge or trial…Israel often uses administrative detention administration against the political opponents of this occupation. In comparison, administrative detention is rarely used to detain Jewish citizens of Israel. »
TORTURE
“For decades, the Israel Security Agency, the Israel Prison Service and the Israeli military forces have tortured or ill-treated Palestinian detainees, including children, during their arrest, transfer or interrogation. »
UNLAWFUL KILLINGS
“The unlawful killing of Palestinian protesters is arguably the most egregious example of the Israeli authorities' use of unlawful acts to maintain the status quo. In 2018, Palestinians in the Gaza Strip began to organize weekly protests along the border with Israel, demanding the right of return for refugees and demanding an end to the blockade. Even before the protests began, senior Israeli officials warned that any Palestinian approaching the wall would be targeted by gunfire. By the end of 2019, Israeli forces had killed 214 civilians, including 46 children. »
This text from La Presse+ is a copy in web format. Consult it for free in an
 

richaceg

Well-known member
Feb 11, 2009
13,919
5,702
113
Don't see any action from UN, US, G20...Israel is simply getting targeted by radicals...nothing new...
 

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
91,744
22,210
113
ISRAEL
THE ART OF TORPEDOING CRITICISM
LAURA-JULIE PERREAULTTHE PRESS
“Israel is not perfect, but it is a democracy committed to international law, open to criticism. This sentence from Yair Lapid, Minister of Foreign Affairs of Israel, is a jewel of irony.
The head of Israeli diplomacy issued the message on Monday just as he was trying to prevent the publication of an Amnesty International report, calling it "anti-Semitic".
In the document, released Tuesday, the human rights organization details for 211 pages how the Middle Eastern country violates international law by imposing a "system of oppression and domination on the Palestinian people wherever they controls his rights.
Through examples, touching on access to property, the right to dissent, the justice system or even democratic representation, the Amnesty report affirms that all Palestinians - whether they are citizens of Israel or whether they rather live in the occupied territories or in refugee camps in neighboring countries - are subject to the "system whose objective is to favor Israeli Jews in the distribution of land and resources, and to minimize the presence of the Palestinian population and its access to land”.

At the end of the analysis which mobilized a team of a dozen researchers for four years, Amnesty concludes that Israel is committing the "crime of apartheid", a crime against humanity, and asks the International Criminal Court to investigate this.
Director General of the French Canadian section of Amnesty, France-Isabelle Langlois, who was consulted in the process of writing the report, notes that every word of the document was weighed. “This report should in no way be construed as a charge against Jews or Israel's right to exist. An organization like ours does not want to add grist to the mill of the anti-Semitic and fascistic tendencies that we observe. This report talks about what the Palestinians go through on a day-to-day basis. We have to name it, say it and continue to put pressure on it. There are activists and citizens in Israel who are also fighting against these violations,” notes Ms. Langlois.
Amnesty is not alone in its camp. Last April, the organization Human Rights Watch, in a very detailed report on Israel and the occupied territories, came to a similar conclusion and used the same term: crime of apartheid.
***
Apartheid? Let's be clear, this accusation is not trivial. The term evokes the South African regime which relentlessly oppressed “black” and “colored” populations for the benefit of whites from 1948 to 1991.
However, a distinction must be made between this authoritarian regime and the crime of apartheid, which has been recognized in international law since the 1960s.
This crime is defined as a set of serious violations of human rights with the aim of maintaining the domination of one racial group over another through discriminatory laws, policies and practices.
The same legal concept is found in the Rome Statute, which defines the jurisdiction of the International Criminal Court, located in The Hague. This court can investigate and try individuals accused of the most serious crimes, which include genocide, war crimes and crimes against humanity.
To date, no one has been tried for apartheid crimes.
***
Under these circumstances, it is no wonder that Israel does not react very well to the accusation. One cannot forget that the country was created to give a state to the Jewish people after the Holocaust and the unparalleled persecutions of the Second World War. A State carrying with it the promise of the protection of a population too long subjected to discriminatory laws and anti-Semitism in Europe and elsewhere. A state that has to deal with a difficult, even hostile and undemocratic neighborhood.
In its original concept, Israel was to be the reverse of apartheid. The reports of Human Rights Watch and Amnesty therefore attack the spinal cord of the Jewish state, and that hurts.
In Canada, we also saw an outcry when the country was accused of “cultural genocide” by the Truth and Reconciliation Commission which looked into residential schools for Aboriginals. There too, the report is hard, but the government nevertheless took note of the conclusions and started a process of reconciliation which promises to be long and difficult.
And that is also what the Israeli government and its staunch allies should do today: take note of the demonstration of wrongs done to them, analyze it with a cool head and work to improve the situation. Drastically.
At least, that is what “a democracy committed to international law, open to criticism” should do.
"Crimes against humanity", according to Amnesty
In its report, Amnesty denounces a set of discriminatory measures, but considers that some of them amount to crimes against humanity. Extracts.
DEPORTATION AND FORCED TRANSFERS
“Since 1948, Israel has destroyed tens of thousands of Palestinian homes and other properties in all areas under its jurisdiction and control. Those affected are often the poorest and most marginalized communities in Israel and Palestinian society. »
ARBITRARY DETENTION
“Since the occupation of the West Bank and Gaza Strip in 1967, Israeli authorities have used administrative detention extensively to imprison thousands of Palestinians, including children, without charge or trial…Israel often uses administrative detention administration against the political opponents of this occupation. In comparison, administrative detention is rarely used to detain Jewish citizens of Israel. »
TORTURE
“For decades, the Israel Security Agency, the Israel Prison Service and the Israeli military forces have tortured or ill-treated Palestinian detainees, including children, during their arrest, transfer or interrogation. »
UNLAWFUL KILLINGS
“The unlawful killing of Palestinian protesters is arguably the most egregious example of the Israeli authorities' use of unlawful acts to maintain the status quo. In 2018, Palestinians in the Gaza Strip began to organize weekly protests along the border with Israel, demanding the right of return for refugees and demanding an end to the blockade. Even before the protests began, senior Israeli officials warned that any Palestinian approaching the wall would be targeted by gunfire. By the end of 2019, Israeli forces had killed 214 civilians, including 46 children. »
This text from La Presse+ is a copy in web format. Consult it for free in an
This is a game changer.
The best they can hope for is that it gets buried in the news.
No Canadian politician can back apartheid.
 

basketcase

Well-known member
Dec 29, 2005
61,454
6,702
113
I'm willing to support full investigations by the ICC based on all allegations on both sides.
...
While obsessively defending Hamas and other Palestinian groups from those accusations and openly rejecting when Amnesty says Settlers are civilians.
 

basketcase

Well-known member
Dec 29, 2005
61,454
6,702
113
A couple other points. I read an interview with the leads on this report and according to them the reason they chose Israel was because people accuse Israel of apartheid. They also admitted that they didn't describe the actions of China towards the Uyghurs as apartheid was because China is to authoritarian for them to get much information. In other words, Israel is so evil they need to be condemned is because they are open enough to allow people of all opinions the freedom to discuss their ideas. They also threw in the racist trope about Israel having influence over powerful allies.

Also worth mentioning is how elitist it is for a bunch of Brits demanding Palestinians become Israeli despite Palestinians overwhelmingly rejecting the idea.

Obvious there is systemic discrimination and the ongoing conflict makes things complicated but Apartheid has a very specific definition. Based on the broad definitions used by these investigators, both Canada and the US can be considered Apartheid as our system discriminates against several groups, specifically our First nations and people of colour.
 

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
91,744
22,210
113
While obsessively defending Hamas and other Palestinian groups from those accusations and openly rejecting when Amnesty says Settlers are civilians.
Three times you made this accusation over the last day.
Three times I replied that its a straw man argument and that all you have to do is post whatever accusations you claim I am ignoring from Amnesty.
Three times you failed and three times instead you repeated the same false claim.

The only one who is denying Amnesty reports is you.

Amnesty says Israel is apartheid.
Israel is apartheid.

 

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
91,744
22,210
113
A couple other points. I read an interview with the leads on this report and according to them the reason they chose Israel was because people accuse Israel of apartheid. They also admitted that they didn't describe the actions of China towards the Uyghurs as apartheid was because China is to authoritarian for them to get much information. In other words, Israel is so evil they need to be condemned is because they are open enough to allow people of all opinions the freedom to discuss their ideas. They also threw in the racist trope about Israel having influence over powerful allies.

Also worth mentioning is how elitist it is for a bunch of Brits demanding Palestinians become Israeli despite Palestinians overwhelmingly rejecting the idea.

Obvious there is systemic discrimination and the ongoing conflict makes things complicated but Apartheid has a very specific definition. Based on the broad definitions used by these investigators, both Canada and the US can be considered Apartheid as our system discriminates against several groups, specifically our First nations and people of colour.
No, Canada and the US are not apartheid.
The reason Israel is reported as apartheid is because Israel is apartheid.

Israel has been warned its been heading this way for half a century.
You've known this is coming yet all you've done is defend it as it comes.

“Israel … better rid itself of the territories and their Arab population as soon as possible. If it did not, Israel would soon become an apartheid state.” - a quote attributed to former Prime Minister David Ben-Gurion by Israeli journalist Hirsh Goodman, after the Six-Day War in 1967.

“I don’t think it’s possible to contain over the long term, if we don’t want to get to apartheid, a million and a half [more] Arabs inside a Jewish state” - former Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin during a TV interview in 1976.

"If this bloc of millions of Palestinians cannot vote, that will be an apartheid state." - remarks at the Herzliya security conference in 2010from former Prime Minister Ehud Barak.

"If the day comes when the two-state solution collapses, and we face a South African-style struggle for equal voting rights, then, as soon as that happens, the state of Israel is finished.” - former Prime Minister Ehud Olmert in an interview with the Israeli newspaper Haaretz in 2010

“On the Palestinian matter, [Benjamin Netanyahu’s] policies are leading to either a binational state or an apartheid state.” - Meir Dagan, a former head of the Mossad spy agency, in a TV interview with Channel 2 in 2015.


 
Ashley Madison
Toronto Escorts