you vote for the bumUm, you do realize that Trudeau has absolutely no control over lockdowns right?
Sad when people get to wrapped up in political bullshit to see the reality in front of them.
you vote for the bumUm, you do realize that Trudeau has absolutely no control over lockdowns right?
Sad when people get to wrapped up in political bullshit to see the reality in front of them.
Okay, let me translate for you. BJ is political toast. He hasn't delivered on the ridiculous promises of Brexit - because no one could. They were ludicrous. He has been caught defying COVID regulations and there is an inquiry afoot. And he won't chuck out the Good Friday Agreement because the IRA will re start the Troubles and Biden will fuck him over.
End of Covid! All restrictions in England to be scrapped within DAYS
ALL covid restrictions in England will end in 10 days, a senior Government source has confirmed.
By DAVID MADDOX - SUNDAY EXPRESS POLITICAL EDITOR, LUCY JOHNSTON - SUNDAY EXPRESS HEALTH EDITOR
00:00, Sun, Jan 16, 2022 | UPDATED: 07:18, Sun, Jan 16, 2022
Sign up for FREE now and never miss the top politics stories again
SUBSCRIBE
We use your sign-up to provide content in ways you've consented to and to improve our understanding of you. This may include adverts from us and 3rd parties based on our understanding. You can unsubscribe at any time. More info
The news comes as Boris Johnson continues to fight for his political life as fury rages over lockdown parties in Downing Street and a member of his own cabinet demands an end to the drinking culture in his Government.
RELATED ARTICLES
The end of restrictions means mandatory mask wearing at schools, on public transport and at indoor events, controversial covid passports, and demands that people work from home will finish on January 26.
- Brexit LIVE: Boris hands licences to NINE EU supertrawlers
- Booming Britain: EIGHT ways UK is better off outside EU
All that will remain will be a requirement to isolate for five days with a positive covid test and the need to take lateral flow tests for international travel.
Health Secretary Sajid Javid was last night said to be “sure” that the restrictions will not be needed after the January deadline.
The Sunday Express learnt that the Prime Minister had already been handed an ultimatum before Christmas by senior Conservative backbenchers that he would face a leadership vote of confidence if he tried to bring in more restrictions.
The threat came after 101 Conservative MPs opposed the current restrictions in a Commons rebellion on December 14.
Conservative MPs have made it clear to Mr Johnson that restrictions needed to end as soon as possible.
In recent days amid the revelations about parties, some have stressed that Mr Johnson’s resistance to scientists pushing for greater restrictions and “getting the policy right” was what prevented them from submitting a letter to 1922 Committee chairman Sir Graham Brady calling for a vote of confidence in his leadership.
But even close allies of the Prime Minister last night warned Mr Johnson that there needed to be a change of culture.
Health Secretary Sajid Javid (Image: PA)
Writing for the Sunday Express, Leader of the House Jacob Rees-Mogg urged people to stand by the Prime Minister for delivering on Brexit and getting the country through the pandemic.
But he added: “It is clear that there is a drinking culture in Downing Street that would be questionable in ordinary time let alone during a period of restriction.”
Meanwhile, former Conservative minister Tobias Ellwood said the Prime Minister must “lead or step aside”, saying: “We need leadership.”
Labour leader Sir Keir Starmer said: “We’ve got a Prime Minister who is absent - he is literally in hiding at the moment and unable to lead, so that’s why I’ve concluded that he has got to go.
“And of course there is a party vantage in him going, but actually it is now in the national interest that he goes, so it is very important now that the Tory party does what it needs to do and gets rid of him.”
Health Secretary Sajid Javid is expected to formally announce in the coming days that he will not renew the restrictions when their sunset clause ends on January 26.
A source said he “feels confident about the decision” because of the falling number of cases and evidence that Omicron is not as dangerous as other variants.
The source added: “Sajid [Javid] is sure now that the restrictions will not go beyond the sunset clause date.”
The Health Secretary had already reduced isolation times for positive tests down to five days from 10
End of Covid! All restrictions in England to be scrapped within DAYS
ALL covid restrictions in England will end in 10 days, a senior Government source has confirmed.www.express.co.uk
Great news........Let's hope this comes to fruition.
Sigh. Great spin from "Citizen Free Press", aka "Only WE Know The Truth Pass It On Press"And the dominoes keep falling. This time in Israel.
I'm just curious, are you voting for Dofo who has brought in lockdowns and masking and mandates?you vote for the bum
No, he just post the same useless uneducated comments, unlike JC and a few, i may not agree with them, and as ignorant as they are, at least they can give somewhat of a good debate.I'm just curious, are you voting for Dofo who has brought in lockdowns and masking and mandates?
Exactly... DoFo's contemporaries are Kenny and Legault. Our 800lbs gorilla is trying whilst handcuffed between a rock and a hard place (like any Premier would be; regardless of party).I would vote for Dofo, after seeing what Kenny did to Alberta it makes Dofo's look like a stable genius.
SARS had a 10% fatality rate with no lockdowns or vaccines and less than 400 people died. So if there is something even worse than SARS it probably won't be as transmissible and very few would catch it.The problem with covid is it wasn't fatal enough, frankly. Too many people got away with catching it and surviving, and proclaiming "It's nothing, see?" Even while the hospitals were flooded and morgues overflowed.
If the next one is worse, you'll see a much greater disparity between the smart ones who follow health guidelines and get vaccinated and the dumb ones who prefer to pretend it's not happening. If the next disease is, say, 50% lethal, imagine how much better off we'll be afterwards with so many dummies gone? Talk about Darwinian selection!
Notice how the media reports covid deaths as covid related or complications from covid but not actually covid. They don't even mention age or other health issues these people had.How overstated has this been from the beginning of the pandemic? How many of those who we have recorded as died from Covid19 actually died from something else unrelated, such as sepsis.
The world's death rate from 2019 t0 2021 rose by 1.75 million. As of right now covid's death toll is over 5.5 million. So if it's even higher then would'nt the world's death rate be much much higher too.Vastly understated, it seems.
The pandemic’s true death toll: millions more than official counts
Countries have reported some five million COVID-19 deaths in two years, but global excess deaths are estimated at double or even quadruple that figure.www.nature.com
doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-022-00104-8
I don't vote at all,I'm just curious, are you voting for Dofo who has brought in lockdowns and masking and mandates?
Source for your data?The world's death rate from 2019 t0 2021 rose by 1.75 million. As of right now covid's death toll is over 5.5 million. So if it's even higher then would'nt the world's death rate be much much higher too.
Source for your data?
(Why do you think the world death rate hasn't gone up?)
You have a strange way of looking at the world. The fact that covid "wasn't fatal enough" wasn't a problem. It was because of that simple fact that people realized the threat it posed was overblown. If it was 50% lethal, nearly everyone would agree that it posed a significant threat. Mind you, in that type of Black Plague situation you would be among the dead regardless of what preventative steps you took unless you moved to the country with no other people around.The problem with covid is it wasn't fatal enough, frankly. Too many people got away with catching it and surviving, and proclaiming "It's nothing, see?" Even while the hospitals were flooded and morgues overflowed.
If the next one is worse, you'll see a much greater disparity between the smart ones who follow health guidelines and get vaccinated and the dumb ones who prefer to pretend it's not happening. If the next disease is, say, 50% lethal, imagine how much better off we'll be afterwards with so many dummies gone? Talk about Darwinian selection!
SARS was well-known to be almost non-transmissible. That's why it's impact was limited and it died out quickly.SARS had a 10% fatality rate with no lockdowns or vaccines and less than 400 people died. So if there is something even worse than SARS it probably won't be as transmissible and very few would catch it.
I doubt you’ve understood the data you say you’ve been reading and you don’t seem to have a good grasp of risk evaluation. Canada will do the same in approx 4-6 weeks.The alternative is to actually base decisions on data and not just pander to the populist base.
ApparentlyBecause if covid sped their death, it was the cause of death. Is that too complicated?
Good attempt at an insult bro.you vote for the bum