International Energy Agency report - CO2 emissions from electricity hit a record high in 2021

[Frankfooter]

The bet was "a year-over-year increase of 0.15ºC."

No.
Those were not the terms we agreed to for the bet.

This is the bet, the terms were clearly only the number posted by NASA, not the year over year increase.

http://climate.nasa.gov/vital-signs/global-temperature/
If that's the chart you're saying will hit 0.83 at the end of 2015, we definitely have a bet.

Amazing how 6 years later you still won't admit you lost and you are still trying to retroactively change the terms.
Instead you keep using partial quotes that you try to dishonestly mischaracterize.

The full quote you refuse to acknowledge shows that I was calling you out for moving the goal posts and confirming that the terms of the bet remained as the terms you agreed to above.
It was a year-over-year increase of 0.15ºC of the 2014 anomaly from the time of the bet. But the terms of the bet were clear, they were based on the global anomaly hitting 0.83ºC, not 0.83ºC + 'whatever it takes to make moviefan win'.

 

[Moviefan-2]

Sorry, Frankfooter - you can't use your illiteracy to defend your insanity.

The words "end point" and "increase" are not interchangeable. They have different meanings (not to mention that the May 2015 graph no longer exists).

- The bet was "a year-over-year increase of 0.15ºC:" https://terb.cc/xenforo/threads/poll-who-has-won-the-global-warming-bet.548822/page-4#post-5445145

- NASA's reported increase was 0.13ºC: https://www.nasa.gov/press-release/...-shattering-global-warm-temperatures-in-2015/

Frankfooter's six years of claiming he won the bet automatically infers that he is saying 0.13 is greater than 0.15.

 

[Frankfooter]

Sorry, Frankfooter - you can't use your illiteracy to defend your insanity.

The words "end point" and "increase" are not interchangeable. They have different meanings (not to mention that the May 2015 graph no longer exists).

- The bet was "a year-over-year increase of 0.15ºC:" https://terb.cc/xenforo/threads/poll-who-has-won-the-global-warming-bet.548822/page-4#post-5445145

- NASA's reported increase was 0.13ºC: https://www.nasa.gov/press-release/...-shattering-global-warm-temperatures-in-2015/

Frankfooter's six years of claiming he won the bet automatically infers that he is saying 0.13 is greater than 0.15.

Wow, as a science denier you really are also amazing at denying what you even wrote.
For instance, this is the bet and the terms that you and I agreed to right here:

We might get a bet, once you agree to use one chart for recording the results.

For example, your NASA chart that shows 1995 at 0.43 degrees Celsius put 2014 at 0.68 degrees in 2014: http://climate.nasa.gov/vital-signs/global-temperature/

If that's the chart you're saying will hit 0.83 at the end of 2015, we definitely have a bet.

Nowhere in that bet does it mention a year over year increase, the number 0.15 or 0.13.
The terms were clearly only on the numbers posted by NASA on the link you specified and agreed to use.

What I find incredibly funny is that you accuse me of illiteracy and being crazy but here you are claiming that a) this is a bet and b) the first sentence included terms we both agreed to while ignoring the second sentence entirely:

It was a year-over-year increase of 0.15ºC of the 2014 anomaly from the time of the bet. But the terms of the bet were clear, they were based on the global anomaly hitting 0.83ºC, not 0.83ºC + 'whatever it takes to make moviefan win'.

Given the full quote, as proof that you are not illiterate and crazy, please post from that quote where you think the terms of the bet are stated and where you think we both agreed those were the terms of the bet.

Then, compare and contrast with the actual bet terms, where you agreed to the terms of the bet, including the number and where that number would be posted.

We might get a bet, once you agree to use one chart for recording the results.

For example, your NASA chart that shows 1995 at 0.43 degrees Celsius put 2014 at 0.68 degrees in 2014: http://climate.nasa.gov/vital-signs/global-temperature/

If that's the chart you're saying will hit 0.83 at the end of 2015, we definitely have a bet.

Go ahead and prove that you aren't crazy and illiterate.
Remember that even in high school, you're not allowed to use partial quotes and include full references.

 

[Moviefan-2]

Nowhere in that bet does it mention a year over year increase, the number 0.15 or 0.13.

Sorry, Frankfooter - you can't use your illiteracy to defend your insanity.

- The bet was "a year-over-year increase of 0.15ºC:"

It was a year-over-year increase of 0.15ºC of the 2014 anomaly from the time of the bet.

- NASA's reported increase was 0.13ºC: https://www.nasa.gov/press-release/...-shattering-global-warm-temperatures-in-2015/

Frankfooter's six years of claiming he won the bet automatically infers that he is saying 0.13 is greater than 0.15.

 

[Frankfooter]

Sorry, Frankfooter - you can't use your illiteracy to defend your insanity.

- The bet was "a year-over-year increase of 0.15ºC:"

Clearly you are insane and illiterate.

That is a statement, not a bet.
This was the bet.

We might get a bet, once you agree to use one chart for recording the results.

For example, your NASA chart that shows 1995 at 0.43 degrees Celsius put 2014 at 0.68 degrees in 2014: http://climate.nasa.gov/vital-signs/global-temperature/

If that's the chart you're saying will hit 0.83 at the end of 2015, we definitely have a bet.

 

[Moviefan-2]

That is a statement, not a bet.

Sorry, Frankfooter - you can't use your illiteracy to defend your insanity.

- The bet was "a year-over-year increase of 0.15ºC:"

It was a year-over-year increase of 0.15ºC of the 2014 anomaly from the time of the bet.

- NASA's reported increase was 0.13ºC: https://www.nasa.gov/press-release/...-shattering-global-warm-temperatures-in-2015/

Frankfooter's six years of claiming he won the bet automatically infers that he is saying 0.13 is greater than 0.15.

 

[Frankfooter]

Sorry, Frankfooter - you can't use your illiteracy to defend your insanity.

Wow, your total lack of self awareness is astounding.
Lets check now, which of these two statements is a bet:

a)It was a year-over-year increase of 0.15ºC of the 2014 anomaly from the time of the bet. But the terms of the bet were clear, they were based on the global anomaly hitting 0.83ºC, not 0.83ºC + 'whatever it takes to make moviefan win'.

b)http://climate.nasa.gov/vital-signs/global-temperature/
If that's the chart you're saying will hit 0.83 at the end of 2015, we definitely have a bet.

Does one of those two statements say 'we have a bet'?

 

[Moviefan-2]

It was a year-over-year increase of 0.15ºC of the 2014 anomaly from the time of the bet.

- The bet was "a year-over-year increase of 0.15ºC:"

- NASA's reported increase was 0.13ºC: https://www.nasa.gov/press-release/...-shattering-global-warm-temperatures-in-2015/

Frankfooter's six years of claiming he won the bet automatically infers that he is saying 0.13 is greater than 0.15.

 

[Frankfooter]

- The bet was "a year-over-year increase of 0.15ºC:"

Not according to you.

We might get a bet, once you agree to use one chart for recording the results.

For example, your NASA chart that shows 1995 at 0.43 degrees Celsius put 2014 at 0.68 degrees in 2014: http://climate.nasa.gov/vital-signs/global-temperature/

If that's the chart you're saying will hit 0.83 at the end of 2015, we definitely have a bet.

 

[Moviefan-2]

Not according to you.

Sorry, Frankfooter - you can't use your illiteracy to defend your insanity.

- The bet was "a year-over-year increase of 0.15ºC:"

It was a year-over-year increase of 0.15ºC of the 2014 anomaly from the time of the bet.

- NASA's reported increase was 0.13ºC: https://www.nasa.gov/press-release/...-shattering-global-warm-temperatures-in-2015/

Frankfooter's six years of claiming he won the bet automatically infers that he is saying 0.13 is greater than 0.15.

 

[Frankfooter]

Sorry, Frankfooter - you can't use your illiteracy to defend your insanity.

- The bet was "a year-over-year increase of 0.15ºC:"

You know, moviefan. As science denier tactics this one is really pathetic.
Using a partial quote, with a link, where the very next sentence shows you're lying about the intent and what I said is just sad.
Its one thing to be dishonest, but to be so illiterate as first to think that sentence means something other than it does and second to link to a quote which actually refutes your claims is just crazy.


It was a year-over-year increase of 0.15ºC of the 2014 anomaly from the time of the bet. But the terms of the bet were clear, they were based on the global anomaly hitting 0.83ºC, not 0.83ºC + 'whatever it takes to make moviefan win'.

The post you quoted very clearly states that the terms of the bet were on the annual anomaly hitting 0.83ºC.
If you continue to lie about what I said by using partial quotes I will report you to the mods.
I'm getting tired of how dishonest you are.

Apologize and admit you are wrong.

 

[Moviefan-2]

Sorry, Frankfooter - you can't use your illiteracy to defend your insanity.

- The bet was "a year-over-year increase of 0.15ºC:"

It was a year-over-year increase of 0.15ºC of the 2014 anomaly from the time of the bet.

- NASA's reported increase was 0.13ºC: https://www.nasa.gov/press-release/...-shattering-global-warm-temperatures-in-2015/

Frankfooter's six years of claiming he won the bet automatically infers that he is saying 0.13 is greater than 0.15.

 

[Moviefan-2]

...I will report you to the mods.

Be sure to show them these two links about the graphs and confirm for them that you have spent six years lying about the graph in the May 2015 link:

Data.GISS: GISTEMP Updates to Analysis, ERSST v4 vs. v3b

data.giss.nasa.gov

https://imagizer.imageshack.us/a/img633/3926/1lTpKo.png

 

[Frankfooter]

Sorry, Frankfooter - you can't use your illiteracy to defend your insanity.

- The bet was "a year-over-year increase of 0.15ºC:"

Second warning.

Please stop spamming the board with partial quotes that only prove you to be lying.
The full quote, with link, shows you are intentionally mischaracterizing what I am saying and spamming the board.

It was a year-over-year increase of 0.15ºC of the 2014 anomaly from the time of the bet. But the terms of the bet were clear, they were based on the global anomaly hitting 0.83ºC, not 0.83ºC + 'whatever it takes to make moviefan win'.

Please stop and apologize or I will report you to the mods.

 

[Moviefan-2]

Frankfooter:

I'm probably going to regret this ... but I'm going to try to get you to think like a rational human being.

More than 6.5 years after we made the bet, there is NOBODY on TERB who is still interested in this topic other than you.

NOBODY!!

I told you years ago that I was sick of you constantly posting about it and I told you the exact same thing as recently as a few days ago.

If you really want to put an end to it, you don't have to go crying to the mods. All you have to do is STOP posting about it.

I can guarantee that if you put a complete and final stop to it, I will never post anything about it again.

It's that simple.

 

[Frankfooter]

Frankfooter:

I'm probably going to regret this ... but I'm going to try to get you to think like a rational human being.

More than 6.5 years after we made the bet, there is NOBODY on TERB who is still interested in this topic other than you.

NOBODY!!

I told you years ago that I was sick of you constantly posting about it and I told you the exact same thing as recently as a few days ago.

If you really want to put an end to it, you don't have to go crying to the mods. All you have to do is STOP posting about it.

I can guarantee that if you put a complete and final stop to it, I will never post anything about it again.

It's that simple.

Agreed, all you need to do is apologize spamming the board with an intentional misquote and then we can move on.
Easy.

 

[Moviefan-2]

Agreed, all you need to do is ....

It's not a negotiation.

I've already given you a commitment that I'll stop posting about this topic if you commit to do the same. This is for you to decide all on your own.

 

[Frankfooter]

It's not a negotiation.

I've already given you a commitment that I'll stop posting about this topic if you commit to do the same. This is for you to decide all on your own.

I'm glad to hear that you've backed down and will stop being childish and intentionally misquoting me.
Now all you need to do is apologize.

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1483137082977517570