Sorry, Frankfooter - you can't use your illiteracy to defend your insanity.
The words "end point" and "increase" are not interchangeable. They have different meanings (not to mention that the May 2015 graph no longer exists).
- The bet was "a year-over-year increase of 0.15ºC:"
https://terb.cc/xenforo/threads/poll-who-has-won-the-global-warming-bet.548822/page-4#post-5445145
- NASA's reported increase was 0.13ºC:
https://www.nasa.gov/press-release/...-shattering-global-warm-temperatures-in-2015/
Frankfooter's six years of claiming he won the bet automatically infers that he is saying 0.13 is greater than 0.15.
Wow, as a science denier you really are also amazing at denying what you even wrote.
For instance, this is the bet and the terms that you and I agreed to right here:
We might get a bet, once you agree to use one chart for recording the results.
For example, your NASA chart that shows 1995 at 0.43 degrees Celsius put 2014 at 0.68 degrees in 2014:
http://climate.nasa.gov/vital-signs/global-temperature/
If that's the chart you're saying will hit 0.83 at the end of 2015, we definitely have a bet.
Nowhere in that bet does it mention a year over year increase, the number 0.15 or 0.13.
The terms were clearly only on the numbers posted by NASA on the link you specified and agreed to use.
What I find incredibly funny is that you accuse me of illiteracy and being crazy but here you are claiming that a) this is a bet and b) the first sentence included terms we both agreed to while ignoring the second sentence entirely:
It was a year-over-year increase of 0.15ºC of the 2014 anomaly from the time of the bet. But the terms of the bet were clear, they were based on the global anomaly hitting 0.83ºC, not 0.83ºC + 'whatever it takes to make moviefan win'.
Given the full quote, as proof that you are not illiterate and crazy, please post from that quote where you think the terms of the bet are stated and where you think we both agreed those were the terms of the bet.
Then, compare and contrast with the actual bet terms, where you agreed to the terms of the bet, including the number and where that number would be posted.
We might get a bet, once you agree to use one chart for recording the results.
For example, your NASA chart that shows 1995 at 0.43 degrees Celsius put 2014 at 0.68 degrees in 2014:
http://climate.nasa.gov/vital-signs/global-temperature/
If that's the chart you're saying will hit 0.83 at the end of 2015, we definitely have a bet.
Go ahead and prove that you aren't crazy and illiterate.
Remember that even in high school, you're not allowed to use partial quotes and include full references.