NOT GUILTY on all charges, Kyle Rittenhouse
- Thread starter unassuming
- Start date
- Status
It's also called democracy, a lofty concept that most Canadians only understand little. The people of Wisconsin decided that self defense is a fundamental right and provided the citizenry(themselves)with the means to exercise it. Hence, you can carry a weapon and even use it in certain circumstances. It may not meet your definition of "civilized", but this is what the voters agreed to.
Honestly? If I was the judge and this was trial by judge, I would follow the law prescribed by the state (Wisconsin), and, like it or not, I'd have found him not guilty.
My criticism isn't so much about the verdict, but rather about how fucked up laws in the United States are.
Do your self a quick google lots of under 18 served in both wars
The Boys Who Lied About Their Age To Fight In WW2 | HistoryExtra
Boys as young as 14 lied about their age in order to enlist and fight in the Second World War
www.historyextra.com
Last edited:
In hardcore lefty NYC they arrest you for protecting yourself.
The Story Of Bernhard Goetz, The Mugging Victim Turned "Subway Vigilante" (allthatsinteresting.com)
The Story Of Bernhard Goetz, The Mugging Victim Turned "Subway Vigilante" (allthatsinteresting.com)
It may surprise you, but we have self defence in Canada as well.
He would have done time for the gun, as would Grosskreutz. But he would have been acquitted of murder in Toronto, just like Kenosha.
training was quick mostly on equipment use buddy system ? It’s not kindergarten
Bottom line is if a 17-year-old can invade and liberate Europe they can walk around with a legal firearm
I haven't been following all the testimony but if the charges involve the events captured in this video:
Then I would have found him not guilty of the shots fired as he fell down before the protesters retreated. There is a point after he was clearly out of danger when he stood up, walked a little then leveled his rifle and fired into the retreating people. If those shots wounded anyone, I would find him guilty of those resulting charges. Based on that clip I would certainly support reckless use/ endangerment of a firearm if there was a charge.
Just my view from the peanut gallery.
Regardless of the judgement, there are a lot of wacko militia groups that you don't want arming themselves and turning a civil unrest event into an armed conflict. It has to be law enforcements ultimate nightmare..
Then I would have found him not guilty of the shots fired as he fell down before the protesters retreated. There is a point after he was clearly out of danger when he stood up, walked a little then leveled his rifle and fired into the retreating people. If those shots wounded anyone, I would find him guilty of those resulting charges. Based on that clip I would certainly support reckless use/ endangerment of a firearm if there was a charge.
Just my view from the peanut gallery.
Regardless of the judgement, there are a lot of wacko militia groups that you don't want arming themselves and turning a civil unrest event into an armed conflict. It has to be law enforcements ultimate nightmare..
Meanwhile 17yo cannot consent to have sex for money. just saying.
After reading the hatchet job they did on Jordan Peterson it was obvious what their agenda was.
And I'm a middleweight.....
- Status
