Kyle Rittenhouse trial

[Butler1000]

the purpose of the projectile is the be propelled towards a target of the operators choosing the gun cannot fire or select a target by itself

we can go on all night

the FACT is a gun is a mechanical device that requires a human to do anything all your what ifs doesn't change that

your car can easily be used a s a weapon should you choose to use it as such or it takes you shopping again you choose not the car

Dude. The purpose of a gun is to kill. Period. It was invented, designed, redesigned, mass produced to kill. And the vast majority of the time specifically to kill people. You argument is the same as saying a guillotine is designed to chop melons.

Removal of mass produced guns, especially handguns, who's ONLY PURPOSE is to kill people would be better for society. I don't use a meat cleaver to shave a carrot either. Or a hammer to mash potatoes.

Restricting weaponry in regular citizenry to 2 shot shotguns, 5 shot bolt action rifles, with proper background checks would do zero harm to farmers, hunters etc. And the rest of us would be alot safer.

 

[Mr.Know-It-All]

Removal of mass produced guns, especially handguns, who's ONLY PURPOSE is to kill people would be better for society.

Removing all guns and bombs from the world may be good for the world, but it's not going to happen either.

Guns exist to combat the threat of violence by others. It's why entire armies exist. It may all go away in your dreams but never in reality.

There is absolutely nothing wrong with handguns and citizens legally owning them.

 

[contact]

Dude. The purpose of a gun is to kill. Period. It was invented, designed, redesigned, mass produced to kill. And the vast majority of the time specifically to kill people. You argument is the same as saying a guillotine is designed to chop melons.

Removal of mass produced guns, especially handguns, who's ONLY PURPOSE is to kill people would be better for society. I don't use a meat cleaver to shave a carrot either. Or a hammer to mash potatoes.

Restricting weaponry in regular citizenry to 2 shot shotguns, 5 shot bolt action rifles, with proper background checks would do zero harm to farmers, hunters etc. And the rest of us would be alot safer.

and no the purpose of a gun is to fire a projectile down the barrel the gun is NOT capable of firing itself or choosing the target

you don't get to decide what someone else can or can not own, or decide what limits there are. You have required a license to purchase a firearm in Canada since 1978 and to own guns since the 1990's

handguns in Canada can and are legally owned for collecting or target shooting

you guys don't seem to understand there are hundreds of millions of guns they are never going away ever

the Toronto shootings probably 95% are illegal guns smuggled in from the us usually short barreled that where prohibited here in the early 1990's how did that ban work out?



where there is a criminal demand for guns there will always be a supply if you have machine skills you can make guns (illegal in Canada without permit)

 

[Butler1000]

Removing all guns and bombs from the world may be good for the world, but it's not going to happen either.

Guns exist to combat the threat of violence by others. It's why entire armies exist. It may all go away in your dreams but never in reality.

There is absolutely nothing wrong with handguns and citizens legally owning them.

You just proved my point. Its why militaries exist. So civilians DON'T have to carry weapons. And there is nothing wrong with continuing to work towards the goal of no guns.

 

[Butler1000]

and no the purpose of a gun is to fire a projectile down the barrel the gun is NOT capable of firing itself or choosing the target

you don't get to decide what someone else can or can not own, or decide what limits there are. You have required a license to purchase a firearm in Canada since 1978 and to own guns since the 1990's

handguns in Canada can and are legally owned for collecting or target shooting

you guys don't seem to understand there are hundreds of millions of guns they are never going away ever

the Toronto shootings probably 95% are illegal guns smuggled in from the us usually short barreled that where prohibited here in the early 1990's how did that ban work out?



where there is a criminal demand for guns there will always be a supply if you have machine skills you can make guns (illegal in Canada without permit)

Which is all nice but my point stands. There is no valid reason. Just want. I didn't say remove all guns, just the ones that serve no purpose.

 

[Bagilson]

Which is all nice but my point stands. There is no valid reason. Just want. I didn't say remove all guns, just the ones that serve no purpose.

Your point is moot. You have no right to regulate others’ wants when they don’t directly affect you.

 

[Mr.Know-It-All]

You just proved my point. Its why militaries exist. So civilians DON'T have to carry weapons. And there is nothing wrong with continuing to work towards the goal of no guns.

The military doesn't exist so that citizens don't have to carry weapons. Where does it state any such thing here ???

Police exist to arrest criminals, prevent crime, and enforce the law. This certaintly doesn't mean civilians don't have to carry weapons.

Private security and armed bodyguards exist to protect those that hire them (i.e. citizens wealthy enough that they don't have to carry weapons), but unfortunately most people cannot afford that type of security.

Civilians don't have to carry weapons... they can choose to, for any number of reasons including protection.

The goal should be working towards less violent criminals. Without them, there is virtually no gun problem.

 

[Mr.Know-It-All]

If politicians can hire armed security for protection (on tax payer's dime to boot), private citizens should be able to own legal guns. If hiring armed security is outlawed for everyone including all politicians, then citizens can forfeit their right to bear arms.

When pigs fly.

 

[Phil C. McNasty]

I know the mods gave you a vacation but you could at least take a second to view the post I was responding to

In other words you got nothing

 

[Charlemagne]

Kyle Rittenhouse trial: Judge’s off-colour ‘Asian food’ joke draws more scrutiny onto courtroom comments

Judge’s ‘Asian food’ joke draws more scrutiny onto Rittenhouse trial comments

Heightened scrutiny into judge’s behaviour follows high-profile case intertwining issues of white vigilantism, the Second Amendment and criminal justice

www.independent.co.uk

Proof they got a racist judge in there. This whole trial is a sham.

 

[contact]

Kyle Rittenhouse trial: Judge’s off-colour ‘Asian food’ joke draws more scrutiny onto courtroom comments

Judge’s ‘Asian food’ joke draws more scrutiny onto Rittenhouse trial comments

Heightened scrutiny into judge’s behaviour follows high-profile case intertwining issues of white vigilantism, the Second Amendment and criminal justice

www.independent.co.uk

Proof they got a racist judge in there. This whole trial is a sham.

Why because you don’t like the fact the evidence is going to clear kyle

eveyone involved in this is white but nice try with crying racist which is the typical liberal response

 

[contact]

Which is all nice but my point stands. There is no valid reason. Just want. I didn't say remove all guns, just the ones that serve no purpose.

You don’t get to decide what serves a purpose a gun is not a weapon unless used as one

the knives in your kitchen can kill but they are not weapons unless used as such

 

[richaceg]

I know law is different in different situations but arming yourself and intentionally putting yourself in a situation you had no right to be in is a factor.

I'm also sure that if it were an armed BLM protester interjecting himself in Trump rally, people would be saying the Trumpies had a right to defend themselves from the armed "thug".

I dont know where you're going at with this. KR was there early on to help out, clean up and safeguard properties. he never fired his gun until he had to...he was fleeing, meaning he never wanted to engage....he fell down and thats when he fired his gun at the person chasing him...

 

[jalimon]

Making a point using lies . Interesting way of doing things .

wrong a gun cannot kill anyone with a human operating it the human makes the choice and operates the gun

fact guns are never going to be gone there are hundreds of millions of them and growing each day

gun ownership in Canada is up as is the us

Guns kills or injures people, often kids, by mistake every year. More then 15k people get their life shattered by gun related injuries.

No matter how you try to convince me you will never succeed. Gun kills people. Period.

 

[contact]

Guns kills or injures people, often kids, by mistake every year. More then 15k people get their life shattered by gun related injuries.

No matter how you try to convince me you will never succeed. Gun kills people. Period.

42,000 Americans died in car accidents in 2020 (estimated) usually 32-36000 per year

falls kill 39,000

accidental poisonings kill 65,000

I don't care if I convince you

guns are mechanical objects that cannot think or operate without a human a human chooses to load aim and fire a gun the human operator commits the crime not the device

 

[Mr.Know-It-All]

Guns kills or injures people, often kids, by mistake every year. More then 15k people get their life shattered by gun related injuries.

No matter how you try to convince me you will never succeed. Gun kills people. Period.

Maybe you've never heard of cost-benefit analysis?

 

[mandrill]

Your point is moot. You have no right to regulate others’ wants when they don’t directly affect you.

Does that mean that drunk driving laws don't apply because most drunk drivers don't "directly affect" me?

How about seat belt laws?

 

[Nathan 88]

It’s rigged!
The whole trial is a sham!
Just listen to the ramblings of The judge.
He will be found not guilty and he’ll go back to carrying his assault rifle around trying to defend the world.

 

[Phil C. McNasty]

If one of them was walking around a proud boy's rally, you'd be calling for the death penalty

I would not be

 

[richaceg]

It’s rigged!
The whole trial is a sham!
Just listen to the ramblings of The judge.
He will be found not guilty and he’ll go back to carrying his assault rifle around trying to defend the world.

He will be guilty for carrying an assault grade rifle at 17 yrs old...the rest of the case will be dismissed.