![www.vice.com](https://www.vice.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2021/09/1631194601411-doy.png?resize=2000,1125)
Cop Was Instructed to Use Music to Disrupt Filming
Police are playing copyrighted music while being filmed to prevent activists from uploading the video; one in Illinois says he was "advised" to do so.
![www.vice.com](https://www.vice.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2024/06/cropped-site-icon-1.png?w=32)
So when a cop is doing something wrong and covering up by playing music, you are ok with that?Nice way to piss off the looney left.
If the video exists of a cop breaking the law... it can still be used as evidence whether there is music or not. It just can't be uploaded on YouTube to make some guy rich off clicks.So when a cop is doing something wrong and covering up by playing music, you are ok with that?
I get good don't always need to be recorded but sometimes they do. Like when they shoot a guy in the back and kill him. Should that video not have been played because some coo decided to play copywritten music?
Doesn't "fair use" permit usage of short snippets? Would think that it's just being "background music" would loosen that even a little further. Doesn't take that long a video to get a point across...
No, I recently had an Instagram post removed from FIVE YEARS AGO because of the song that was playing in the background, on a commercial radio station.Doesn't "fair use" permit usage of short snippets? Would think that it's just being "background music" would loosen that even a little further. Doesn't take that long a video to get a point across...
Fair use dosent work that way. 1 second get you knocked off. You appeal. Weeks go by, and then you can up the video up. For live viewing this will block uploading in general - unless new sights put up a corrupt cop you tube site.Doesn't "fair use" permit usage of short snippets? Would think that it's just being "background music" would loosen that even a little further. Doesn't take that long a video to get a point across...