Vaughan Spa

Dr. Dre ordered to pay ex-wife $300,000 a month

Charlemagne

Well-known member
Jul 19, 2017
15,451
2,484
113
 

Robert Mugabe

Well-known member
Nov 5, 2017
9,518
6,529
113
Hmmmmmmmmmm.................
 

y2kmark

Class of 69...
May 19, 2002
19,064
5,442
113
Lewiston, NY
[QUOTE="
Who is Dr. Dre?
[/QUOTE]
Obviously a guy who can afford $300K a month. The big question is why is she worth so much - sounds punitive...
 

richaceg

Well-known member
Feb 11, 2009
14,050
5,847
113
[QUOTE="
Who is Dr. Dre?
Obviously a guy who can afford $300K a month. The big question is why is she worth so much - sounds punitive...
[/QUOTE]
nobody is that much but based on his networth that's what she's getting...not even a big fan but I know he's famous but thats a hefty amount on a monthly basis...
 

Mr.Know-It-All

Giver of truth
Jul 26, 2020
2,072
1,398
113
Obviously a guy who can afford $300K a month. The big question is why is she worth so much - sounds punitive...
He's worth close to a billion dollars. If she gets these payments for the next 30 years, it'll be just over $100 million in total. This is like paying her the interest off his money.
 
  • Like
Reactions: roadhog

Jenesis

Fabulously Full Figured
Supporting Member
Jul 14, 2020
9,459
9,599
113
North Whitby Incalls
www.jenesis.ch
Obviously a guy who can afford $300K a month. The big question is why is she worth so much - sounds punitive...
She was married to him for 24 years. He wouldn’t have been able to care for the house, kids etc and still make all his millions without her keeping that part of life going. Just because her name was not on his pay check does mean she didn’t help make it possible for him to make that money.
 
Last edited:

y2kmark

Class of 69...
May 19, 2002
19,064
5,442
113
Lewiston, NY
She was married to him for 24 years. He wouldn’t have been able to care for the house, kids etc and still make all his millions without her keeping that part of life going. Just because her name was not on his pay check does mean she didn’t help make it possible for him to make that money.
Any way you view "contribution", keeping house and things like entertaining business clients, isn't going to match the $100 mill price tag, even if she was with him for 145 years...
 

poker

Everyone's hero's, tell everyone's lies.
Jun 1, 2006
7,741
6,021
113
Niagara
Any way you view "contribution", keeping house and things like entertaining business clients, isn't going to match the $100 mill price tag, even if she was with him for 145 years...
Nonsense. Should have been half.
 

Jenesis

Fabulously Full Figured
Supporting Member
Jul 14, 2020
9,459
9,599
113
North Whitby Incalls
www.jenesis.ch
Any way you view "contribution", keeping house and things like entertaining business clients, isn't going to match the $100 mill price tag, even if she was with him for 145 years...
It is not “contribution. She took care of things so he had the time to make money.

Bosses may own the business but employees make it run so bosses can make money.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mandrill

mandrill

Well-known member
Aug 23, 2001
76,611
88,448
113
Chapeau to the divorce attorney. Dude just earned big RESPECT!!
👨‍⚖️
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: roadhog and poker

mandrill

Well-known member
Aug 23, 2001
76,611
88,448
113
She was married to him for 24 years. He wouldn’t have been able to care for the house, kids etc and still make all his millions without her keeping that part of life going. Just because her name was not on his pay check does mean she didn’t help make it possible for him to make that money.
Like the lady said, modern family law implies a 50:50 property and financial partnership in any marriage where there is no pre nup. It's possible to fail the test - i.e. if you're so lazy, you don't contribute at all, or if the marriage is very short, or if the spouses do not collaborate on very much at all and each do their own thing.

But a 24 year marriage where the wife looked after the kids and house, the judge is going to say "equal partners".

Is that fair?.... Some people are luckier with partners than others. If I bought in to Microsoft in 1979, that would be a pretty good partnership. If I bought into my lazy-ass bro-in-law's half-dicked pizza parlour, I'd be broke.

Same thing with spousal partners. Dre's wife had a good partner. So she wins big. If his record company failed - which was statistically probable - she's be getting $100.00 per month from a guy who deejays at weddings and bar mitzvah's. So it's luck.

And Dre's worth a $ billion?.... How the fuck is that even fair, in and of itself in a society where the average guy probably makes between 50 and 60 thousand a year?! You live in an open capitalist society, shit is so slanted and unequal that it makes no sense by any logical analysis.

Same thing re his wife. There's no way her taking care of the kids and supervising the help cleaning the mansion is worth $300,000 per month. But it's the appropriate partnership share of his grossly overpaid business.
 
  • Like
Reactions: poker

HeavyNaturals

Well-known member
Jun 26, 2021
236
304
63
He took that women from the hood to the palace
Now she gets $300000 a month
Just another clear example as to never marry cause it’s only a business
 
  • Haha
Reactions: mandrill

angrymime666

Well-known member
May 8, 2008
1,094
656
113
She was married to him for 24 years. He wouldn’t have been able to care for the house, kids etc and still make all his millions without her keeping that part of life going. Just because her name was not on his pay check does mean she didn’t help make it possible for him to make that money.
a live in nanny would fulfill this role very easily which would not cost $300lk per month, which would allowed for the same success in his life.

I agree that some support should be negotiated but to suggest that 300k per month is reasonable is unreasonable.
 

mandrill

Well-known member
Aug 23, 2001
76,611
88,448
113
a live in nanny would fulfill this role very easily which would not cost $300lk per month, which would allowed for the same success in his life.

I agree that some support should be negotiated but to suggest that 300k per month is reasonable is unreasonable.
No judge in North America would agree with you.
 
  • Like
Reactions: poker

angrymime666

Well-known member
May 8, 2008
1,094
656
113
No judge in North America would agree with you.
I am aware or the legal system; however, it doesnt mean that I agree with the way the law is applied. when the bulk of the work of creating something and building it to a billion dollar empire is justified by law to be split by their discretion I have a problem with. whether it is male or female, this person built something from nothing. crediting someone with equal share or a decided share because they rode on the owners coattails is rather parasitic.
 
Toronto Escorts