Yes, much better to start a war and kill hundreds of thousand of humans to accelerate the process.He 'delayed' the end of slavery claiming sudden change would be bad. That was a bad decision, definitely.
I'm all for it, as long as they replace him with Justin in black face with his tongue out.Just a matter of time until they come after McDonald and erase him from our $10 bills
Pizza place owner refuses John A. Macdonald $10 bills
A Mi’kmaw-owned pizza shop recently announced that it will no longer accept $10 bills bearing the image of Canada’s first prime minister.torontosun.com
Some indigenous people have many different words for snow. I'm sure one would be appropriate and it would fit right in in TO...Personally never heard of Mr Dundas.
But whatever.
How about Snowflake Way?
Agreed not to mention that the previous vote to abolish slavery immediately failed by another parliamentarian failed miserably - this was a strategic motion that passed and for that Henry Dundas should not be reviled. It was a different time and this was likely the only way to get it passed 200 years ago FFS.Yes, much better to start a war and kill hundreds of thousand of humans to accelerate the process.
Omg you with your sick mind so easily picture women dropping their clothing en masse to please you and other men like you. You should have nothing to do with women you moral dissolute, you!I say we drop the Dund and go with Ass St and start banging hookers on every corner.
LJ
Ah - if you are going to launch a campaign against moral dissolutes, Terb is probably not the best place to start...Omg you with your sick mind so easily picture women dropping their clothing en masse to please you and other men like you. You should have nothing to do with women you moral dissolute, you!
The main context is that at the time slaves represented valuable property. The elite throughout history have fought to defend property. Non gradual abolition was an alternative to giving up that property all at once. Slaves, by definition, are property. At that time in history only abolitionists (considered a radical fringe till Uncle Tom's Cabin) stopped to consider that the "property" was another human being...Agreed not to mention that the previous vote to abolish slavery immediately failed by another parliamentarian failed miserably - this was a strategic motion that passed and for that Henry Dundas should not be reviled. It was a different time and this was likely the only way to get it passed 200 years ago FFS.
The dimwits who jump on the 'gradual' abolishment of slavery as racist should educate themselves. Idiots. They need context. Including John Tory.