First post mortem case of patient vaccinated against covid......

squeezer

Well-known member
Jan 8, 2010
21,534
16,357
113
Interesting read........
HAHAHA, you just love proving my point that you are a looneytune! You love reading and consuming bullshit and nonsense. The question is A) are you a complete nutbag and buy into it or B) Just a troll and get off at watching folks read your crap and have that WTF look on their face


 

PeteOsborne

Kingston recon
Feb 12, 2020
2,180
2,030
113
kingston
The actual post mortem references in the article.
Yeah, key points the way I see it:
He had only 1 dose and had tested positive for covid but they did not observe any characteristic morphological features of COVID-19, meaning the vaccine was doing its job.
Acute bronchopneumonia and tubular failure were assigned as the cause of death at autopsy.
So he didn't die of covid or the vaccination.
 

smallhatchet

Well-known member
Feb 10, 2020
2,071
221
63
HAHAHA, you just love proving my point that you are a looneytune! You love reading and consuming bullshit and nonsense. The question is A) are you a complete nutbag and buy into it or B) Just a troll and get off at watching folks read your crap and have that WTF look on their face


I know its a different read or source of info you're not use to seeing.

You stay locked on the "Unnamed sources" and "Doesnt wish to be identified" material because its more credible and fits the narrative.
 

squeezer

Well-known member
Jan 8, 2010
21,534
16,357
113
I know its a different read or source of info you're not use to seeing.

You stay locked on the "Unnamed sources" and "Doesnt wish to be identified" material because its more credible and fits the narrative.
If you get your head out of your ass you might actually see a little reality and allow the fog to lift.
 
  • Like
Reactions: shakenbake

smallhatchet

Well-known member
Feb 10, 2020
2,071
221
63
If you get your head out of your ass you might actually see a little reality and allow the fog to lift.
Maybe the guy who knows more about the MRNA can tell you more about it?......................
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Valcazar

squeezer

Well-known member
Jan 8, 2010
21,534
16,357
113
Maybe the guy who knows more about the MRNA can tell you more about it?......................
Read and absorb but please remove your nonsense and bullshit goggles.

 

smallhatchet

Well-known member
Feb 10, 2020
2,071
221
63
Read and absorb but please remove your nonsense and bullshit goggles.

Read and absorb????

Did you read the article and its warnings????

I didnt read a thing about how good this Dr.'s snake poison is anywhere???

Did you?

Why dont you believe the proof coming straight from the ex-VP's mouth??? He is a doctor and scientist. What dont you believe in the article now??
 

Male4Strapon

Well-known member
Mar 16, 2021
1,477
1,659
113
Why dont you believe the proof coming straight from the ex-VP's mouth??? He is a doctor and scientist. What dont you believe in the article now??
It's not really an article, it's (ironically) a fact-check with a verdict given on his claims

There are numerous points in which they dismiss his account:
  1. Ex-Pfizer scientist repeats COVID-19 vaccine misinformation in recorded speech
  2. A former Pfizer scientist turned anti-vax proponent has made unfounded claims
  3. The claims were viewed thousands of times on Facebook and this check will examine those which are most damaging.
  4. The whole paragraph ASYMPTOMATIC INFECTION disputes what he's claiming.
  5. Yeadon also dismisses concerns in his speech about COVID-19 variants by claiming there is “zero chance” immunised people - either through the vaccine or prior infection - can be susceptible to them. Meedan’s Health Desk, a group of public health scientists working to tackle medical misinformation online, said this claim was false.
  6. The shots have been proven to be safe and to give the best protection against COVID-19
  7. Yeadon has previously speculated, without evidence, that vaccines cause infertility in women. Like nearly all clinical trials, COVID-19 vaccine studies initially excluded pregnant women, meaning there was limited evidence as to how they would be affected. New advice was issued in April 2021 after real-world data from the U.S. showed 90,000 pregnant women had been safely vaccinated
  8. VERDICT False. Infected but symptom-free people can spread the coronavirus; vaccinated people are better protected but not 100% immune; research shows COVID-19 vaccines are safe and effective for adults and pregnant women.
 

squeezer

Well-known member
Jan 8, 2010
21,534
16,357
113
Read and absorb????

Did you read the article and its warnings????

I didnt read a thing about how good this Dr.'s snake poison is anywhere???

Did you?

Why dont you believe the proof coming straight from the ex-VP's mouth??? He is a doctor and scientist. What dont you believe in the article now??
You didn't listen and absorb! You're doomed to Delusional Gullibility which there yet is no cure. NO, don't try Clorox! A cure is being worked on this new disease. Pfizer claims they are close to a breakthrough.
 

smallhatchet

Well-known member
Feb 10, 2020
2,071
221
63
You didn't listen and absorb! You're doomed to Delusional Gullibility which there yet is no cure. NO, don't try Clorox! A cure is being worked on this new disease. Pfizer claims they are close to a breakthrough.
Pfizer claims their vaxx is safe and apparently its not. BUt I know you see no problem with that and its completely safe.....
 

smallhatchet

Well-known member
Feb 10, 2020
2,071
221
63
It's not really an article, it's (ironically) a fact-check with a verdict given on his claims

There are numerous points in which they dismiss his account:
  1. Ex-Pfizer scientist repeats COVID-19 vaccine misinformation in recorded speech
  2. A former Pfizer scientist turned anti-vax proponent has made unfounded claims
  3. The claims were viewed thousands of times on Facebook and this check will examine those which are most damaging.
  4. The whole paragraph ASYMPTOMATIC INFECTION disputes what he's claiming.
  5. Yeadon also dismisses concerns in his speech about COVID-19 variants by claiming there is “zero chance” immunised people - either through the vaccine or prior infection - can be susceptible to them. Meedan’s Health Desk, a group of public health scientists working to tackle medical misinformation online, said this claim was false.
  6. The shots have been proven to be safe and to give the best protection against COVID-19
  7. Yeadon has previously speculated, without evidence, that vaccines cause infertility in women. Like nearly all clinical trials, COVID-19 vaccine studies initially excluded pregnant women, meaning there was limited evidence as to how they would be affected. New advice was issued in April 2021 after real-world data from the U.S. showed 90,000 pregnant women had been safely vaccinated
  8. VERDICT False. Infected but symptom-free people can spread the coronavirus; vaccinated people are better protected but not 100% immune; research shows COVID-19 vaccines are safe and effective for adults and pregnant women.
But, but, but.......hes a scientist and a doctor. Why dont you believe him???? You dont believe science when it doesnt fit the narrative???? LMAO

#8 proves how stupid you are.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Valcazar

squeezer

Well-known member
Jan 8, 2010
21,534
16,357
113
Pfizer claims their vaxx is safe and apparently its not. BUt I know you see no problem with that and its completely safe.....
Well genius, I've got news for you! As of Friday, I will be injecting the boner-inducing, creator of the blue dick steroid, the one, and only in the BLUE CORNER, HEAVYWEIGHT CHAMPION OF THE WORLDDDDDDDDDDD PFIZER as my second shot!
 

Male4Strapon

Well-known member
Mar 16, 2021
1,477
1,659
113
But, but, but.......hes a scientist and a doctor. Why dont you believe him???? You dont believe science when it doesnt fit the narrative???? LMAO

#8 proves how stupid you are.
I know you're trying but you're just not sufficiently armed for intellectual debate and you continue to embarrass yourself.

The overwhelming majority of scientists and doctors disagree with him. So why is he more credible than the 99% of other scientists and doctors who you dismiss since that doesn't fit your narrative?

#8 is a quote from the Fact-Check from Rueters, it was not my posting my personal opinion. I am not Reuters so you can tell them how stupid you think they are, though the fact you couldn't make the distinction doesn't bode well for your judgement of others' intelligence.
 
Toronto Escorts