A Friend Said This Isn't Gay...

[massman]

Fuck, so many 12 year olds on here.

Personally, I’ve never got the whole “if born a dude, always a dude and if you have sex with a trans woman, you are gay”. Personally I’ve never got a boner from looking at two XX chromosomes. Nor have I lost a boner while thinking about XY chromosomes.

Gay is if you are romantically/sexually attracted to dudes, and not women. Nothing else.

But who TF cares? Have sex with who you want, why the fuck should anyone have to label it? Not only do the guys here want to label a specific type of attraction as “gay”, they treat it is an insult too. Which = homophobia, and that is a label that is used in the appropriate context.

You’d think a bunch of people with sex interests that are at the margins of what society thinks is “socially acceptable” would be a little more open minded.

 

[massman]

This makes a lot of sense. I think I would give a fantastic blow job. Only I have no desire to suck a man's cock or have a man suck my cock. At the same time, I'm in no way homophobic. I've had MFM encounters with my wife we've done the couples/group thing but there was never any interaction between the guys. Now if the opportunity ever arose to get a blow job from a feminine looking Asian shemale, I probably wouldn't say no. Although I'd like to have a couple drinks first.

Then you are gay, no?

 

[Male4Strapon]

You’d think a bunch of people with sex interests that are at the margins of what society thinks is “socially acceptable” would be a little more open minded.

Bill Murray Applause GIF by MOODMAN - Find & Share on GIPHY

Discover & share this Bill Murray Applause GIF by MOODMAN with everyone you know. GIPHY is how you search, share, discover, and create GIFs.

giphy.com

 

[Jenesis]

For all you guys forcing this intro a sexual orientation - it would be at most fall into the bi-sexual realm as the person has sex with both men and women

Again, I think it is a fetish though.

 

[onomatopoeia]

I'm glad I don't have those urges. Personally, I'd rather take a .45 slug to the temple than suck another guy's dick; I wouldn't be able to respect myself afterwards. But that's just me.

I don't like gay men. I'm not saying that I dislike them, but my reaction to them is usually in the slightly negative to neutral range, with some lukewarm. Specific individual gay men is a different scale, some I abhor, others only as a source for humour, most where their sexuality is irrelevant to me. If I see a handsome man, my private reaction, if any, might be 'wish I looked like him'.

I find it difficult to repect openly gay men, mainly because they have willingly succumbed to temptations that I would resist, which diminishes them as men, from my perspective. I see them as weaker, rather than as peers.

There's a reason why "The Lord's Prayer" is repeated over and over, but more importantly, collectively, in Christianity. "...and lead me not into temptation" - that's what much of the discussion in this thread is about. Consider that line for a moment - why would God lead a man into temptation? This is a mantra for the latently bi-curious heterosexual man to resist base urges. You repeat it over and over until eventually you think you thought it on your own.

 

[NotADcotor]

Fuck, so many 12 year olds on here.

No thanks, I'd rather not fuck any 12 year olds. No Priest.

Yeah yeah, I know that isn't what you meant. I have the mentality of a 12 year old after all which is what you meant.

Personally, I'd rather take a .45 slug to the temple than suck another guy's dick

If the choice was to take a .45 slug or suck dick. I'd be going down on those dicks like a seal and finish by shoving that .45 in my ass.
It's easy to talk tough but when you have that 45 aimed to the back of your skull it's a different story.

However I'd suck a dick to get a new pair of kicks or a turkey sandwich with mayo. I am not easy but I am really cheap [inexpensive]

 

[onomatopoeia]

No thanks, I'd rather not fuck any 12 year olds. No Priest.

Yeah yeah, I know that isn't what you meant. I have the mentality of a 12 year old after all which is what you meant.


If the choice was to take a .45 slug or suck dick. I'd be going down on those dicks like a seal and finish by shoving that .45 in my ass.
It's easy to talk tough but when you have that 45 aimed to the back of your skull it's a different story.

However I'd suck a dick to get a new pair of kicks or a turkey sandwich with mayo. I am not easy but I am really cheap [inexpensive]

I hope the .45 did not permanently damage your anus.

 

[NotADcotor]

I hope the .45 did not permanently damage your anus.

I meant the slug, not fired, obviously )
Also obvious hypothetical is obvious.

 

[massman]

I'm glad I don't have those urges. Personally, I'd rather take a .45 slug to the temple than suck another guy's dick; I wouldn't be able to respect myself afterwards. But that's just me.

I don't like gay men. I'm not saying that I dislike them, but my reaction to them is usually in the slightly negative to neutral range, with some lukewarm. Specific individual gay men is a different scale, some I abhor, others only as a source for humour, most where their sexuality is irrelevant to me. If I see a handsome man, my private reaction, if any, might be 'wish I looked like him'.

I find it difficult to repect openly gay men, mainly because they have willingly succumbed to temptations that I would resist, which diminishes them as men, from my perspective. I see them as weaker, rather than as peers.

There's a reason why "The Lord's Prayer" is repeated over and over, but more importantly, collectively, in Christianity. "...and lead me not into temptation" - that's what much of the discussion in this thread is about. Consider that line for a moment - why would God lead a man into temptation? This is a mantra for the latently bi-curious heterosexual man to resist base urges. You repeat it over and over until eventually you think you thought it on your own.

dude, you are on a prostitution discussion board and you are quoting biblical scripture to support your homophobia?

(at the same time as saying that being gay is a “temptation “ that you have had the strength to resist????? )

 

[Jenesis]

I'm glad I don't have those urges. Personally, I'd rather take a .45 slug to the temple than suck another guy's dick; I wouldn't be able to respect myself afterwards. But that's just me.

I don't like gay men. I'm not saying that I dislike them, but my reaction to them is usually in the slightly negative to neutral range, with some lukewarm. Specific individual gay men is a different scale, some I abhor, others only as a source for humour, most where their sexuality is irrelevant to me. If I see a handsome man, my private reaction, if any, might be 'wish I looked like him'.

I find it difficult to repect openly gay men, mainly because they have willingly succumbed to temptations that I would resist, which diminishes them as men, from my perspective. I see them as weaker, rather than as peers.

There's a reason why "The Lord's Prayer" is repeated over and over, but more importantly, collectively, in Christianity. "...and lead me not into temptation" - that's what much of the discussion in this thread is about. Consider that line for a moment - why would God lead a man into temptation? This is a mantra for the latently bi-curious heterosexual man to resist base urges. You repeat it over and over until eventually you think you thought it on your own.

You are homophobic and need to look at why the thought of an openly gay man makes you feel inferior.

 

[NotADcotor]

(at the same time as saying that being gay is a “temptation “ that you have had the strength to resist????? )

I mean, kriky, who can resist the smooth taste of cock I guess.

I guess it's like how Jebus cultists think you can't be good without their imaginary friend threatning you with torture forever. As if they would be killing, robbing, raping, not returning library books, going to Justin Beiber concerts and the only thing stopping them from those desires is the threat of hell. But you know, it's the atheists who are reprobates.

 

[onomatopoeia]

dude, you are on a prostitution discussion board and you are quoting biblical scripture to support your homophobia?

(at the same time as saying that being gay is a “temptation “ that you have had the strength to resist????? )

No, you didn't read my post properly. I don't have the urge or curiosity to have sex with a man. Some men do, and may give in to those urges because they want to have sex right now, with someone or something. Homosexuality is taboo to Christian doctrine, so The Church conditions members to not want to engage in gay sex through a prayer repeated and spoken aloud like an oath, from a young age.

Not being 'pro gay' does not make me homophobic. I judge other men by their words and deeds, rather than by their wardrobe, job, or stock portfolio size. It's one thing to engage in a gay sex act, and quite another to tell everyone else about it, as many openly gay men do. I value discretion, as should everyone on this board. Openly gay men are not known for keeping their mouths shut, literally and figuratively. I don't consider them, as a group, to be sacred cows, immune from criticism or humour font.

 

[onomatopoeia]

Yada, yada ... I see them as weaker, rather than as peers...

You are homophobic and need to look at why the thought of an openly gay man makes you feel inferior.

You're reading too quickly, not reading all the words, or adjectivally challenged, again.

 

[Robert Mugabe]

But what if that person is purely straight and is was a one night thing

In no way is it fair to label them as gay bor really the situation as anything. If the ladyboy has female pronouns and identifies as female then in no way would it be gay.

I am getting a headache from this whole thread

But what if that person is purely straight and is was a one night thing
What if a person isn't a murderer but for one instance?
Isn't a pedophile but for one kid?
A thief but for one theft?
Don't fuck guys. Only in prison.
Once you have crossed a line, the line can't be uncrossed.
Not trying to make an analogy between any of those and flying half way round the world to fuck guys in lipstick. Nothing wrong with that. But to try and deny the gayness of it is kind of whistling in the wind.

 

[Frankfooter]

Reading 6 pages of posts about if its just a little bit gay or not to have sex with someone with a dick really just means you're interested and maybe a little gay yourself.

no homo.

 

[massman]

No, you didn't read my post properly. I don't have the urge or curiosity to have sex with a man. Some men do, and may give in to those urges because they want to have sex right now, with someone or something. Homosexuality is taboo to Christian doctrine, so The Church conditions members to not want to engage in gay sex through a prayer repeated and spoken aloud like an oath, from a young age.

Not being 'pro gay' does not make me homophobic. I judge other men by their words and deeds, rather than by their wardrobe, job, or stock portfolio size. It's one thing to engage in a gay sex act, and quite another to tell everyone else about it, as many openly gay men do. I value discretion, as should everyone on this board. Openly gay men are not known for keeping their mouths shut, literally and figuratively. I don't consider them, as a group, to be sacred cows, immune from criticism or humour font.

[/QUOTE]. I see them as weaker, rather than as peers.[/QUOTE] = homophobic.

again, “church”. For the record, show me where in the Christian bible (written 1000s of years ago, and adapted by many to secure their power since) where 1) homosexuality is explicitly forbidden and 2) where it is viewed as a greater sin than much of what we do in every day life, in 2021.

 

[onomatopoeia]

. I see them as weaker, rather than as peers.[/QUOTE] = homophobic.

again, “church”. For the record, show me where in the Christian bible (written 1000s of years ago, and adapted by many to secure their power since) where 1) homosexuality is explicitly forbidden and 2) where it is viewed as a greater sin than much of what we do in every day life, in 2021.
[/QUOTE]

Your word, not mine. Phobia is a Greek language word meaning 'fear of'. I'm not afraid of homosexuals. I don't hate them, either. I just don't personally approve of some of the lifestyle decisions they make, and have made.

It probably starts with the Old Testament Book of Genesis, and the destruction of Sodom and Gomorrah, because there weren't ten righteous men in town. New Testament vilification of homosexuality is primarily in the writings of Paul, rather than in Gospels.

Leviticus 20:13 is pretty explicit: " If a man lies with a male as he lies with a woman, both of them have committed an abomination. They shall surely be put to death. Their blood shall be upon them".

Quote from New King James Version via search at biblegateway dot com

Judaism, Christianity, and Islam all promote procreational sex, in large part to increase 'market share'. Gay men having sex is 100% recreational, as there is no possibility of unplanned pregnancy.

I'm not a religious person, but I have read scripture from a number of different Faiths, if only to improve my self-education.

From another board:

Well of course it's been a lie all along. All monotheistic religions are designed to control the dull group, the ones who are smart enough to earn enough money to pay taxes, but not smart enough to avoid paying taxes, form their own opinions, plan parenthood, or hold onto money, once they get some. Why do you think 'the Lord is their shepherd'?

You show me someone on this forum who's holding onto money after they get some, and I'll show them what's in this bag, for whatever amount of money they have in that hand. If it's a woman, and she's hot, she'll probably be given the opportunity to get most of that money back.

 

[Jenesis]

You're reading too quickly, not reading all the words, or adjectivally challenged, again.

Oh I read. Trust me I read. My post still stands. You can spew all the bullshit reasoning you want but it all ends up the same. You are complete homophobic dude.

 

[Robert Mugabe]

Reading 6 pages of posts about if its just a little bit gay or not to have sex with someone with a dick really just means you're interested and maybe a little gay yourself.

no homo.

You've been following it for six pages. what's that make you?

 

[onomatopoeia]

Oh I read. Trust me I read. My post still stands. You can spew all the bullshit reasoning you want but it all ends up the same. You are complete homophobic dude.

You don't seem to understand the differences between superior, peer, and inferior.

Don't put this on itchy mouth lips; it's toxic.