???
No you do not
There are lots of extremely well qualified scientists who have a different view
More insults
No an idiot is someone who thinks a scientific question is determined by an opinion poll survey
I thought you were going to run away before embarrassing yourself further
That was amusing at first
A genius? No
Attacking the source of information to avoid discussing the content?
Obviously you know very little
You are likely twice as fast, yet half as bright as Forrest
His source of reliable info is from satirical websites. LOL!
babylonbee.com
babylonbee.com
No...I didn't ask for satellite data from the 1850's. For someone claiming to be smart, that is not what i asked for.
Look Einstein
So yes you asked for for satellite data from the 1850's.
anybody whos not a sheepeople understands it better than you do
You need to learn the difference between a scientist and an activist
What a stupid statement
Nobody gets paid for highlighting propaganda or stupidity
The contents of the words are far more important than the source, if you are willing to think..... sadly that no good for you or other sheepeople
Gee a running sheepeople, a Forest Gumpster and a slithering snake all rolled into the same package combined with an uneducated and uncompromising opinion on a complex scientific issue
I love the slither gif.
Oh, he's only just starting that 'infrared absorption' business now.
Look Einstein
Post #4 ---- I posted a graph of Satellite Temperature data
The graph is clearly labeled Satellite Temperatures and I explicitly state " According to the satellite data it is -0.01 C cooler than the 1991- 2000 average"
Post #16 - You quote Post # 4 and demand I extend the data from before the industrial revolution (any data set back to the industrial revolution will include data from the 1850s)
So yes you asked for for satellite data from the 1850's.
Despite the fact satellites would not be invented for at least 100 years
Had you paid attention to what you were reading in Post #4 in the first place you might not have embarrassed yourself like that
And now you seem intent on re-living your stupidity over and over gain
anybody whos not a sheepeople understands it better than you do
I do understand the science much better than you, that is for sure
I do have a WORKING knowledge of Infrared absorption and understand why triatomic molecules are theoretically greenhouse gases
(Hopefully that should be a clue for you, but you are pretty slow on the uptake )
You need to learn the difference between a scientist and an activist
l also asked you if you knew what is the specific question the so called 97% consensus is supposedly based on
You declined to answer so , we will assume you do not know
Again consensus is not at all relevant to scientific discovery
Go learn something about Galileo vs. the consensus of the sun revolving around the earth
He died a broken man under house arrest for questioning / opposing the consensus
What a stupid statement
You are assuming scientists do not like the ladies?
What is your scientific basis for that absurd conclusion?
Nobody gets paid for highlighting propaganda or stupidity
Are you going to pay me for highlighting yours ? Nope
The contents of the words are far more important than the source, if you are willing to think..... sadly that no good for you or other sheepeople
According to you each of the following is invalid as they all are from an "unknown source"
However here is a sourced quote for you, happy now?
- Never judge people by their past.
- Sometimes you just have to accept the fact that certain things will never go back to how they used to be.
- If something feels off, it usually is.
Try to read the big words slowly , you might understand them better
Gee a running sheepeople, a Forest Gumpster and a slithering snake all rolled into the same package combined with an uneducated and uncompromising opinion on a complex scientific issue
and not an ounce of common sense to realize an opinion on a subject matter you do not understand is of no value
Look Einstein
Post #4 ---- I posted a graph of Satellite Temperature data
The graph is clearly labeled Satellite Temperatures and I explicitly state " According to the satellite data it is -0.01 C cooler than the 1991- 2000 average"
Post #16 - You quote Post # 4 and demand I extend the data from before the industrial revolution (any data set back to the industrial revolution will include data from the 1850s)
So yes you asked for for satellite data from the 1850's.
Despite the fact satellites would not be invented for at least 100 years
Had you paid attention to what you were reading in Post #4 in the first place you might not have embarrassed yourself like that
And now you seem intent on re-living your stupidity over and over gain
anybody whos not a sheepeople understands it better than you do
I do understand the science much better than you, that is for sure
I do have a WORKING knowledge of Infrared absorption and understand why triatomic molecules are theoretically greenhouse gases
(Hopefully that should be a clue for you, but you are pretty slow on the uptake )
You need to learn the difference between a scientist and an activist
l also asked you if you knew what is the specific question the so called 97% consensus is supposedly based on
You declined to answer so , we will assume you do not know
Again consensus is not at all relevant to scientific discovery
Go learn something about Galileo vs. the consensus of the sun revolving around the earth
He died a broken man under house arrest for questioning / opposing the consensus
What a stupid statement
You are assuming scientists do not like the ladies?
What is your scientific basis for that absurd conclusion?
Nobody gets paid for highlighting propaganda or stupidity
Are you going to pay me for highlighting yours ? Nope
The contents of the words are far more important than the source, if you are willing to think..... sadly that no good for you or other sheepeople
According to you each of the following is invalid as they all are from an "unknown source"
However here is a sourced quote for you, happy now?
- Never judge people by their past.
- Sometimes you just have to accept the fact that certain things will never go back to how they used to be.
- If something feels off, it usually is.
Try to read the big words slowly , you might understand them better
Gee a running sheepeople, a Forest Gumpster and a slithering snake all rolled into the same package combined with an uneducated and uncompromising opinion on a complex scientific issue
and not an ounce of common sense to realize an opinion on a subject matter you do not understand is of no value
Unbelievable !!!
HaHa
As opposed to your uneducated and ignorant posts
.
And right on que, you revert to cancel culture with the the "big oil funding " argument and character assignation of the author / organization
Switched handles did ya?
Aw come on!!!! who's gonna entertain me with stupid posts? Why would you rob me of your intellectual genius? Who will tell me where to find sasquatch? Who will explain the flat earth to me? Please don't go!!!! Hahahahaha!
Larue's latest science 'experts' main gig is running Fairytale Princess Parties.
Great source! hahahahha
