Massage Adagio

Sydney Powell says "no reasonable person" would believe her claims about Dominion Voting Machine

Previous Thread Next Thread
mandrill

mandrill

monkey
Aug 23, 2001
80,936
107,049
113
The Sydster moves to dismiss Dominion's libel suit and argues that she was so clearly lying when she claimed that Dominion's voting machines were defective, that no reasonable person would actually believe a word she said.

Aahh, the ultimate grifter's defence - "My vics should have known that I was such a big lying piece of shit that it's their own fault that they got scammed!"

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1374100890181902340
 
  • Like
Reactions: doggystyle99, SchlongConery and Charlemagne
S

squeezer

Well-known member
Jan 8, 2010
22,612
17,683
113
mandrill said:
The Sydster moves to dismiss Dominion's libel suit and argues that she was so clearly lying when she claimed that Dominion's voting machines were defective, that no reasonable person would actually believe a word she said.

Aahh, the ultimate grifter's defence - "My vics should have known that I was such a big lying piece of shit that it's their own fault that they got scammed!"

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1374100890181902340
Click to expand...
Hold on there one minute!!! Dutchie completely bought into it. She's LYING through her teeth!!!
 
  • Haha
  • Like
Reactions: glamphotographer, danmand, Charlemagne and 1 other person
mandrill

mandrill

monkey
Aug 23, 2001
80,936
107,049
113
squeezer said:
Hold on there one minute!!! Dutchie completely bought into it. She's LYING through her teeth!!!
Click to expand...
Dutchie is not the classic "reasonable person" that judges use to judge whether something is actionable. Dutchie is...... err, Dutchie.

Betcha Dutch donated to her defence crowd funder - based on her telling him that she was telling the truth.
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: danmand and squeezer
L

Leimonis

Well-known member
Feb 28, 2020
10,374
10,371
113
squeezer said:
Hold on there one minute!!! Dutchie completely bought into it. She's LYING through her teeth!!!
Click to expand...
she just has to say it now because of deep state and all. But the real truth is out there! Hugo Chavez, you can run but you cannot hide!
 
  • Haha
Reactions: mandrill
S

squeezer

Well-known member
Jan 8, 2010
22,612
17,683
113
Leimonis said:
she just has to say it now because of deep state and all. But the real truth is out there! Hugo Chavez, you can run but you cannot hide!
Click to expand...
She needs Rudy to defend her after he properly dyes his hair.
 
L

Leimonis

Well-known member
Feb 28, 2020
10,374
10,371
113
  • Haha
Reactions: squeezer
J

jalimon

Well-known member
Jan 10, 2016
7,846
8,182
113
You go on national television with the Potus to make claims to the American population and now your line of defense is that no reasonable person would believe you?

First of all the Potus beside you believed you. Isn't that enough? Sue her to her last penny. Bitch!
 
  • Like
Reactions: danmand, squeezer and shakenbake
F

Fun For All

Well-known member
Feb 9, 2014
11,968
6,057
113
jalimon said:
You go on national television with the Potus to make claims to the American population and now your line of defense is that no reasonable person would believe you?

First of all the Potus beside you believed you. Isn't that enough? Sue her to her last penny. Bitch!
Click to expand...
I don't think the POTUS did believe her, but he was hoping the courts did...Trump was trying to steal the election.
 
P

Perry Mason

Well-known member
Aug 20, 2001
4,680
208
63
Here
In general, the defamation laws in the US are the same as here... the bigger the lie, the bigger the award of damages... and if she knew she was lying when she said what she said, the jury can award exemplary damages... and in the US, the damages awarded in defamation cases are much higher than here.

Her defence helps the plaintiff much more than they help her...

Perry
 
  • Like
Reactions: mandrill
F

Fun For All

Well-known member
Feb 9, 2014
11,968
6,057
113
Perry Mason said:
In general, the defamation laws in the US are the same as here... the bigger the lie, the bigger the award of damages... and if she knew she was lying when she said what she said, the jury can award exemplary damages... and in the US, the damages awarded in defamation cases are much higher than here.

Her defence helps the plaintiff much more than they help her...

Perry
Click to expand...
Fun For All said:
It’s a Tucker Carlson defence...

www.businessinsider.com

Fox News won a court case by 'persuasively' arguing that no 'reasonable viewer' takes Tucker Carlson seriously

Tucker Carlson has a long history of making racist and controversial statements as a primetime host on Fox News.
www.businessinsider.com www.businessinsider.com
Click to expand...
 
P

Perry Mason

Well-known member
Aug 20, 2001
4,680
208
63
Here
Carlson and Powell are very different situations for the purposes of defamation claims...

As the judge in Carlson said: "Carlson's statements were not statements of fact" and the plaintiff "failed adequately to allege actual malice" and [I think wrongly, because it is a question for the jury, not for a judge to decide,] "given Mr. Carlson's reputation, any reasonable viewer arrives with an appropriate amount of skepticism about the statements he makes."

Perry
 
Last edited:
mandrill

mandrill

monkey
Aug 23, 2001
80,936
107,049
113
It would be a very odd world if a lawyer gave a press conference about the facts which she claimed to be able to prove in a high profile case which was about to be argued and then took the position that it was a mere expression of opinion.

I could give a press conference, allege that the opposing party raped his 8 month old child and that I intended to prove that in a trial in a week's time and then make no attempt to prove those facts and subsequently take the position that my out of court rant was so extreme that no one should believe it and I am immune from a libel claim.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Ashley Madison
Previous Thread Next Thread
Toronto Escorts
Top Bottom