Video Shows MAGA Rioter Throwing Fire Extinguisher At Capitol Police, Striking One In The Head

[Frankfooter]

In fairness to Dutch: When I pointed out that "it was just in good fun" wasn't a defence to murder, he told me that he was "presenting a political narrative and not a courtroom defence".

I'm not sure wtf Dutch meant by that btw.

Its a 'theory of law and fact that appears rational to him'.

Which means nobody knows what the fuck is going on in his head.

 

[nottyboi]

Its a 'theory of law and fact that appears rational to him'.

Which means nobody knows what the fuck is going on in his head.

Maybe he got hit by a fire extinguisher as a child?

 

[Leimonis]

Its a 'theory of law and fact that appears rational to him'.

Which means nobody knows what the fuck is going on in his head.

 

[Valcazar]

 

[y2kmark]

Why are you calling for the hero officer’s name to be released immediately? What does the MAGA rioter being a veteran have to do with the fact that they were trying to breach a secure area with an angry mob following? How would the hero officer know the rioter was unarmed? The rioter was carrying a backpack that could have had anything in it.

Why do you try to minimize the fire extinguisher attack on officers by the MAGA rioter? You went from light, underhand throw to light shot put, and then invented this “cloth covered” BS narrative. Wearing riot gear doesn’t make the attack by the MAGA rioter any less disgusting. By your “logic“, then it would be okay to shoot them in the chest because they were wearing bullet-proof vests.

How about the second officer who wasn’t wearing a helmet that was struck? You think that throwing a fire extinguisher at police officer’s heads was to “annoy or distract” them? You really don’t want to be taken seriously.

Why mention the barrier? It had no effect on the cowardly attack, as the fire extinguisher was thrown clearly over it by the MAGA rioter. At police officers, while their backs were turned. The barrier even emboldened this coward MAGA rioter because he knew he could get away before they could respond to his cowardly attack.

Defending throwing a fire extinguisher in a crowded "theater", just sad
The guy thought he might get a Presidential Medal of Freedom out of it...WRONG!!!

 

[y2kmark]

Its not a defence its a CHARGE do you know the difference? A legal defense would be - "Someone yelled fire!! so I threw him a fire extinguisher"

These yahoos are brain dead stupid. But even THEY know enough not to yell "FIRE" with so many guns around. Don't think any fires were set either, just some smoke (gas?)...

 

[HungSowel]

Its a 'theory of law and fact that appears rational to him'.

Which means nobody knows what the fuck is going on in his head.

He went full retard on the James fields defense and I think he regrets it, now he is still going full retard but in a twisty and roundabout way that he thinks gives him a veneer of not going full retard while still operating in full retard mode.

 

[Anbarandy]

He went full retard on the James fields defense and I think he regrets it, now he is still going full retard but in a twisty and roundabout way that he thinks gives him a veneer of not going full retard while still operating in full retard mode.

That's good, very good.

The guiding beacon of principle, being:

"What would Norman Bates do?"

 

[Frankfooter]

He went full retard on the James fields defense and I think he regrets it, now he is still going full retard but in a twisty and roundabout way that he thinks gives him a veneer of not going full retard while still operating in full retard mode.

Couched in the language of someone who might work as a security guard in a courtroom and can use some of the terms without understanding the law.