Rand Paul and Judge Starr concisely explain at Senate hearing how the court decisions regarding elections should be interpreted:
The election litigation thread
- Thread starter Dutch Oven
- Start date
Again, go under oath. See what was presented under oath. Full stop. Everything else is carnival barking.
sorry cannot watch it right now, but can you please just concisely tell us: will Trump be leaving the White House on the 20th of January?
Pretty much you answered none of my questions.
You've used S in multiple threads.
You have not said what it means.
If you are concerned about volume of keystrokes, saying nothing, as I suggested, is better than a nonsensical S.
With that explanation all I can say is that S=d'uh. It means nothing and it means that you have nothing to say.
Rand Paul admitting that his issue isn't with illegal voters, just voters in general.
The GOP, especially in Georgia, can only hold on through voter suppression.
Stopping people from voting at all is more key than fraud to him.
GOP caught red-handed presenting false reports about the USSC dismissal of TX case.
A determination that a POTUS had acted fraudulently could only be made by the SCOTUS. It is not up to Lindsay Graham or Rand Paul or Rudy to make that determination. that being said there may be some acts which are so egregious that the election would be a nullity.
You keep referring to an inability or unwillingness of the legal system to deal with this matter. That is simply untrue and either dishonest or disingenuous. There have been 60 cases in which a court has dealt with this matter. Your fearless leader is subject to the same rules of law and procedure as other litigants an he has failed in almost every case. that is just a fact and repeating Russian propaganda will not change that. The final assessment of these allegations has been made. get over it and deal with reality. Destroying |America will ot help even though the soon to be former sire loser in chief thinks it well. When will you and your fellow travelers get it through your head that he cares nothing for you or the country.
Apparently there are Colombians who - to this day - sing folk songs about Pablo Escobar and consider him a patriot and a friend to the Poor Man.
Same sort of self-inflicted blindness.
Rand Paul and Ken Starr misrepresenting the law?
What is this, a day that ends in "Y"?
This thread ends when bud/dutch oven finally gives up and comes up with a new name here.
Like with the James Fields threads.
I can't believe Rand Paul really said this: “I’m very, very concerned that if you solicit votes from typically non-voters, that you will affect and change the outcome.”
WTF! Silly me! I thought that was the very purpose of elections!!!!
Perry
WTF! Silly me! I thought that was the very purpose of elections!!!!
Perry
USSC filing clerks reject 2 Supreme Court krakens, presumably for failure to meet formal filing guidelines - i.e. wrong size paper, out of date court forms and shit like that!
Last edited:
I hope Dominion doesn’t back down...either get Sidney Powell to make a very humbling apology refraction or suit her for a couple hundred million dollars.
Idiot GOP house lawyer shyster Lin Wood is so stupid that he files a court action "under plenty of perjury".
I am truly perplexed by you. You seem at least superficially intelligent but when you post on this topic you are either playing with everyone or really dumb. What is perplexing is that I find it hard to believe that you are really that dumb.
