S!Now, empty name calling - that might fit the definition of trolling better!
Perry
S!Now, empty name calling - that might fit the definition of trolling better!
Trump cultists spouting off about group think and think for yourself is amusing.Nothing passive aggressive at all about my observation. I've explicitly stated that either several handles here are really the same user, or I'm witnessing an extraordinary display of groupthink/hivemind. That's why users constantly answer posts that weren't directed to to them, and purport to be answering for more than themselves (thus, the ubiquitous "we"). Reminds me of the movie "Split".
Now you're just babbling incoherently.S!
Perry
Like someone who only responds with a single letter, S?Now, empty name calling - that might fit the definition of trolling better!
Not sure why? Take a look around. Look at your own posts and those of others. How many others do your posts resemble. How about mine?Trump cultists spouting off about group think and think for yourself is amusing.
SLike someone who only responds with a single letter, S?
Your posts are a lot like butler's.Not sure why? Take a look around. Look at your own posts and those of others. How many others do your posts resemble. How about mine?
SYour posts are a lot like butler's.
Both of you claim to be free thinkers but both of you just follow the views of a narrower subset of ideas that are filled with massive contradictions you ignore due to your confirmation bias.
Butler ends up pushing Trump as part of his accelerationism, his pretence that he backs Trump only to start some culture war that will lead to left wing shangri la with universal medicare, while you try to follow the darker wing of 19th century eugenics and end up backing Trump as the most likely person to put those actions in policy. Both of you claim that your insight is sharper than anyone else here because of how deep you both are in your own rabbit holes and both of you end up backing massive contradictions, as evidenced here by your 'theory of fact and law that appears rational' to you even as it failed 60 times in a row.
Time for your trolling response, your single letter, S?
SDominion CEO testified today before Michigan Senate committee:
He acknowledged that their systems could be hacked, but denied knowledge of any evidence of hacking. He blamed the failed audit of the Antrim Co. machine on a missing software update, but couldn't explain how this software update was missed on only this one machine. He denied that the machines were connected to the internet, but acknowledged that they have ethernet ports that would allow them to be connected. Strangely, he advanced the argument that Dominion must not be the problem because Trump got more votes than Biden in many counties where Dominion machines were used (as if that proves anything).
SS
You're still going to posting this stuff after Jan 20, aren't you, S?
Even stories like the one that only make your claims look foolish and weak minded.
You're kind of like these ladies, who I assume think just like you.
Didn't you watch Better Call Saul?
Interesting choice of words, given Miller's critique that too many judges are concerned with how their decisions will be portrayed by the media to the public. You seem to be lending support to Miller's claim.
If you watch the show, you'll know that the mug was a very tongue in cheek gift from Kim to celebrate Jimmy becoming a partner at Davis & Main, and is a nod by Kim to Jimmy's outlook that lawyers, for the most part, are too full of themselves.Thanks for the smile Dutchie! The most useful post of your recent reincarnation!
Saul is actually a pretty sharp guy! And even sharper practice!
No, you don't see the connection.NOW I see the connection! You and Steven Miller!
We all saw the clip, Dutch and we all understood what Miller said. And everyone but you understood the sub-text to the clip, which is....No, you don't see the connection.
The connection is that Miller is claiming the legal system isn't working because judges are too concerned about coverage from the media, while the poster was making the argument that Miller should be worried about his public reputation, essentially warning him that the media will be sure to destroy it. In essence, the poster is suggesting that public figures, whether judges or politicians, should fear the media. If the poster is right, then it would appear that Miller may be right as well.
No, you don't see the connection.
The connection is that Miller is claiming the legal system isn't working because judges are too concerned about coverage from the media, while the poster was making the argument that Miller should be worried about his public reputation, essentially warning him that the media will be sure to destroy it. In essence, the poster is suggesting that public figures, whether judges or politicians, should fear the media. If the poster is right, then it would appear that Miller may be right as well.