The election litigation thread

toguy5252

Well-known member
Jun 22, 2009
15,964
6,108
113
Close to 40 days until January 20...Trump campaign will still make some moves...don't be surprised if December 14 doesn't go smoothly.
Some of his base still have some money so the soon to be grifter in chief is not done with them yet.
 

mandrill

Well-known member
Aug 23, 2001
77,049
90,586
113
There is one more Kraken to go. The appeal to the WI Supreme Court of the trial decision where the Wisconsin trial judge ridiculed Trump for wasting everyone's time w crap. The appeal decision is due to be released today.

This is Trump's last chance to overturn the election and win it all. What are the odds that he will lose yet again and be kicked out on his ass?
 

bver_hunter

Well-known member
Nov 5, 2005
29,447
7,326
113
They always have Benghazi and Hillary's e-mails. Those are eternal.
Well now it is all about the Hunter Biden tax returns, although they are contented with Trump not releasing his own tax returns and paying just around $950 a year. Even though his own businesses were expensing the Government for his trips to all his Golf Resorts in the tens of millions of dollars. LOL!!
 
  • Like
Reactions: SchlongConery

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
92,210
22,479
113
There is one more Kraken to go. The appeal to the WI Supreme Court of the trial decision where the Wisconsin trial judge ridiculed Trump for wasting everyone's time w crap. The appeal decision is due to be released today.

This is Trump's last chance to overturn the election and win it all. What are the odds that he will lose yet again and be kicked out on his ass?
Less than zero judging by the fact that dutch oven hasn't even bothered posting about that one.
 

Fun For All

Well-known member
Feb 9, 2014
11,428
5,649
113
So what’s next up in election litigation...I expect some fuckery on Monday but is there anything pending?
 

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
92,210
22,479
113
There is one more Kraken to go. The appeal to the WI Supreme Court of the trial decision where the Wisconsin trial judge ridiculed Trump for wasting everyone's time w crap. The appeal decision is due to be released today.

This is Trump's last chance to overturn the election and win it all. What are the odds that he will lose yet again and be kicked out on his ass?
That one failed as well.
What a surprise.

Another Trump-Appointed Judge Rejects Another of the President's Meritless Post-Election Lawsuits
 
  • Haha
Reactions: mandrill

squeezer

Well-known member
Jan 8, 2010
21,119
15,702
113
What a bunch of radical nutbags! It's hilarious but astonishing and a little sad how many dumbasses exist.
 

SchlongConery

License to Shill
Jan 28, 2013
13,145
6,737
113
Less than zero judging by the fact that dutch oven hasn't even bothered posting about that one.
Given Loser Dutchie's 0/100 prediction success rate, maybe that appeal might be a winner. Unlike Loser''s Dutchie and Trumpie! lol
 

mandrill

Well-known member
Aug 23, 2001
77,049
90,586
113

Trump lawyers rebuked as racist by WI Supreme Court Justice. This is looking bleak for the Krakens. Might this be yet another Trump loss?



A Wisconsin Supreme Court justice came right out and said it Saturday when she blasted Donald Trump’s attorney over a lawsuit challenging state election results that “smacks of racism.”

Liberal Justice Jill Karofsky also slammed the legal action as “not normal,” and as an assault on a “legitimate election” that has failed to produce a single case of fraud.

“What you want is for us to overturn this election so that your king can stay in power,” said Karofsky. “That is so un-American.”

Karofsky attacked lawyer James Troupis in a virtual hearing on a case filed by the lame-duck president and Vice President Mike Pence seeking to jettison all absentee ballots in two counties — Dane and Milwaukee — that voted for Joe Biden.

The counties are the “most urban, nonwhite, largest counties” in the state that “voted overwhelmingly for Joe Biden,” Karofsky’s colleague Justice Rebecca Dallet said.

Karofsky said to Troupis that the lawsuit has singled out two counties of 72 in the state, “targeted because of their diverse populations, because they’re urban, I presume, because they vote Democratic. This lawsuit, Mr. Troupis, smacks of racism.”

She added: “I do not know how you can come before this court and possibly ask us for a remedy that is unheard of ... to say to 227,000 of our fellow Wisconsinites: ‘Your vote doesn’t matter.’”

And she wasn’t finished.

“This not normal,” Karofsky continued. “It is not normal for us to be sitting here 48 hours before the Electoral College sits. It is not normal for only two out of 72 counties to be at risk of losing their voice in this election.”

This case is “not about election fraud,” the judge added. “It is not about anyone in this state doing anything wrong. This case is about not just seeding — but watering and nurturing — doubt about a legitimate election.

Karofsky asked Troupis to provide a single case of fraud in the Wisconsin election, which the lawyer was unable to do. He only said that the votes were cast in an “illegal form,” referring to absentee ballots. He admitted the ballots were used statewide, and not just in the two challenged counties.

Karofsky pointed out that the absentee ballot forms were exactly the same as they were in 2016 when Trump won the state, and he did not object to the ballots then.

There was no decision at the end of the 90-minute hearing, though it appeared highly unlikely the court would find in Trump’s favor.

The two justices have voted with the majority of the court in rejecting three postelection suits in the state on Trump’s behalf. Even conservative judges have been taken aback by the actions.

In a ruling earlier this month, Justice Brian Hagedorn said that one of the suits calling for the “court-ordered disenfranchisement of every Wisconsin voter” without credible evidence “would appear to be unprecedented in American history.”

Trump’s battle against his election loss suffered a devastating blow Friday when the U.S. Supreme Court jettisoned a suit by Texas, which was backed by 17 other red states (and 126 Republican members of the House), to toss ballots by four battleground states that voted for Biden. Texas lacks standing to challenge votes in other states, the top court said in a brief, unsigned order.

Trump also lost a federal case in Wisconsin Saturday. U.S. District Judge Brett Ludwig, a Trump appointee, dismissed the suit asking the court to order the Republican-controlled Legislature to name Trump the winner over Biden. The judge said Trump’s arguments “fail as a matter of law and fact.”

Trump has vowed to fight on. But time’s running out. The Electoral College meets Monday to cast ballots that will reflect the will of American voters.
The entire Wisconsin State Supreme Court hearing can be seen on WisEye video here.



 
Ashley Madison
Toronto Escorts