Conspiracies
- Thread starter Tomoreno
- Start date
Without forces of friction you won't be able to jump, won't be able to stand. You'd simply fall.
Mechanisms, rockets won't be able to operate.
Air friction or drag is also a friction.
I didn't go into details or chose one type of friction.
There is even a Manure Spreaders Association website with lots more shit...
Well well....You have dug yourself too deep that you are going to need an airplane to get out!
So "air friction" or "drag" is needed to fly?
Rockets need "friction" so can't operate without friction?
And please reply to my question about how airplanes need friction of the wheels against asphalt or else they can't take off.
So you can't travel in space according to this theory, where there is no friction?
No wonder conspiracies seem reasonable to you.
Then you either didn't do a good job studying those things or you didn't bother reading the actual data out there.
Could it be that they were the only two building of that construction style to ever collapse? Nah, must be magic.
As for the dust, even a simple calculation would show the GPE of the two towers put them in the range of atomic bombs dropped on Japan.
And you keep proving the science you studied. Even a wood fire is hot enough to weaken steel significantly. Those steel beams were the thing holding the building together. Once they lost enough tensile strength they failed, the GPE of the floors above became kinetic energy and allowed the structural frame to peel away from the core.
But that's only the science that applies every single day. Maybe George Bush was able to stop physics for a day so the tinfoil theory could make sense.
No but your theories are. Care to explain how friction applies to a collapsing building? I'd get if you wanted to say inertia or momentum but friction? Wow.
Okay there puppy. Explain how a rocket works in space. What friction do they use to move?Ha! You just sank yourself with this statement! Shows how much you understand about physics!!!
I'd seek help while it's not too late.
And I'll even ignore the whole first law thing.
So you think it's okay to believe just some theories that run counter to substance?
And it is still as wrong now as it was then.
Any object already in motion does not need friction to move. In fact friction (or other resistive forces) will eventually stop its motion. Rockets don't use friction to start moving. Jet engines (essentially) don't use friction to cause an impulse. Plenty of examples.
You might remember something your grade 10 science teacher once said but you obviously didn't understand the context, just like you don't understand the science that utterly destroys any of the claims you've made about 9/11 or the moon.
Wrong. That would be some kind of normal force (assuming you're jumping straight up).
I won't engage in whether anything mentioned in this thread is faked or real. But hell to the yes, tv exited and even well before WW2. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WRGB
However, I'd like to comment that radio transmission and lung transplants are much more complex and impressive than what constitutes a PS5.
Wireless communication is fascinating stuff especially how it's evolved in the modern age. The hardware in a PS5 on the other hand is just an effect of Moore's law.
I don't get all the hostility, as if there are no conspiracies out there.
To say conspiracies don't exist is as stupid as believing every conspiracy theory ever conceived.
To say conspiracies don't exist is as stupid as believing every conspiracy theory ever conceived.
Whenever there's a debate that involves multiple parties there'll be some who are not receptive to information regardless of premise, content or essence.
Religious and political debates are a perfect example. People don't like having their foundational beliefs challenged and that causes hostility.
Any person telling another person who grew up believing in moon landing that it might be untrue - is challanging a foundational belief. Some hostility is expected.
