Which is why party oversight of the signature matching process is so important. It's not possible to separate out the votes that were tallied that should not have been.
The election litigation thread
- Thread starter Dutch Oven
- Start date
Yes and this important fact was in the link:The latest suit filed in Arizona:
Arizona GOP Chair Files Last-ditch Lawsuit to Void Joe Biden's Win in State
Kelli Ward filed a lawsuit as she continues a legal fight against President-elect Joe Biden's historic win in the Grand Canyon State.www.newsweek.com
More to come.
The facts in the article related to the filing of the suit. The rest was meaningless opinion.
Here's another Georgia suit:
justthenews.com
Not sure if Powell is counsel on this, or the suit she said would be filed is still outstanding.
Legal group files lawsuit challenging more than 200,000 ballots in Georgia
Filing argues that "well over 100,000 illegal votes were improperly counted."
justthenews.com
Not sure if Powell is counsel on this, or the suit she said would be filed is still outstanding.
Which has already been certified.What's this? A Pennsylvania judge has blocked any further steps towards certification of the vote in that state:
Pennsylvania Slams Judge’s ‘Overreach’ in Certification Ruling
Pennsylvania Governor Tom Wolf and other state officials assailed a Pittsburgh judge for issuing what they described as an unprecedented order halting additional steps in the certification of President-elect Joe Biden’s election victory.news.bloomberglaw.com
Where have all the lawsuits already filed and been heard in Court gone to?? To You evidence or Lack of it is "Meaningless". OIC, the logic!!
Rudy says ‘big stuff’ coming up.Where have all the lawsuits already filed and been heard in Court gone to?? To You evidence or Lack of it is "Meaningless". OIC, the logic!!
S.The latest suit filed in Arizona:
Arizona GOP Chair Files Last-ditch Lawsuit to Void Joe Biden's Win in State
Kelli Ward filed a lawsuit as she continues a legal fight against President-elect Joe Biden's historic win in the Grand Canyon State.
More to come.
Court Rejects Trump Campaign's Appeal Over 69 Mail-In Ballots | Law & Crime
Noting 'absolutely no allegations of any fraud,' Pennsylvania appeals court rejected one of President Donald Trump's few remaining election lawsuits...over 69 mail-in ballots.
SPennsylvania election fraud hearing before legislature is currently streaming live:
RSBN 🇺🇸 @RSBNetwork
LIVE: Pennsylvania State Legislature Holds Public Hearing on 2020 Electionwww.pscp.tv
Pa. to Top Court: 'No Conceivable Justification' to Meddle with Certification | Law & Crime
There is "no conceivable justification" to issue an order purporting to block whatever has not yet been certified of Pennsylvania's election results, Pennsylvania told its top court on Wednesday.
S
Wall Street Journal: Trump Legal Fight Is All About Appearances | Law & Crime
In public, the Trump campaign is soldiering on and fighting a few remaining legal battles out of dozens originally fought and lost. Behind the scenes the 45th president and his team know it's over in all but name, but they're still exploiting faithful donors who remain convinced Trump's...
Which, even if true -- there is a lot of doubt that there wasn't oversight -- still doesn't help with what they want to have happen.
"It is possible that fraud may have been committed, therefore assume it did and declare my side the winner" doesn't fly.
How badly is it written? Is it full of mistakes and typos? If so, Powell filed it.
If lawsuits were decided based on spelling, that would be quite an astute observation. Spelling mistakes in hastily drafted emergency motions are quite commonplace.
Don't worry - all indications are her legal reasoning is as bad or worse than her copy editing.
Her reasoning is quite straightforward to understand. She is contending that the vote counts reported are not reliable due to the security vulnerabilities of the voting equipment and software that was used. She is advancing circumstantial and opinion evidence in support of her claim, which is exactly the kind of evidence that could possibly be available to her at this point.
Really, it comes down to whether her evidence is credible, and whether it provides a reasonable foundation to defer certification of the election until full investigation and audit can take place. The documents and information necessary to such an audit are, necessarily, not in the possession of the plaintiffs at this time.
If the courts are persuaded by this circumstantial evidence, they have 2 remedies available to them. They could exclude all of the votes that were tallied that are subject to these problems (in some states, that might be all of the votes, in others, just some of them). If that remedy would benefit her client, I'm not surprised that she would ask for it. However, I think the more likely remedy is to order an audit and investigation of all these suspect election procedures, whether that's signature matching, vote tallying at individual voting machines, or the reporting and consolidation of individual machine tallies as a precondition to completing the process of certifying the election results and appointing electors.
Each state has another remedy available. They can declare the results of the election to be unreliable and call a special election "do-over".
Not that complicated at all.
Last edited:
You are quite correct. Lawsuits are decided based on evidence and so far multiple courts and judges, both GOP and Dem, have held that there has been no evidence.
If these people have credible evidence they would have led with it, instead of introducing it in lawsuit #38...
You must re referring to the security vulnerability created by Hugo Chavez. Speculation about vulnerability is not evidence of vulnerability or anything else.
