Not allowed in the Lounge or any other forum either. I believe all previous threads on this topic have been deleted by the Mods.What is the terms and conditions on the Toronto Sugar B Sugar D scene on Terb? Allowed in the Lounge?
Nobody complained. Do you think that the mods should begin letting us discuss street action?Is anyone else bothered by the censorship of this topic? We are not children, we should be allowed to discuss topics we find interesting.
We did have previous threads on the topic which were, IMO, quite helpful.Nobody complained.
Haven't really thought about it before, but I suppose I can see an argument for discouraging discussion of street action based on the safety concerns and level of exploitation in that scene. I don't think that applies to sugar dating; many people have healthy and successful sugar relationships.Do you think that the mods should begin letting us discuss street action?
I contributed.We did have previous threads on the topic which were, IMO, quite helpful.
You should have actually read the thread rather than "having heard of a thread" before making your baseless assumptions. When two consenting adults mutually agree on terms that they believe are favourable to them and their situation, I don't call that tricking anybody. I call it an arrangement.I have heard of a thread on here that was pretty bad. A lot of posts would explain how to trick a woman and give her less than she expected.
That’s probably why they don’t let you talk about it anymore
To me, this is the most-likely reason there are no longer any Sugar threads allowed. Sugar Babies don't pay for advertising on the site. SP's do, and money talks.No, I doubt it’s for any moral reason. The SP’s here are paying advertisers, and sugar talk hurts their business.
I've been sent screenshots and they weren't really pleasant to read to be honest. I don't think it's fair to discuss ways to underpay people. If both people agree with the arrangement it's good but that didn't seem to be the case in the screenshots I've seenYou should have actually read the thread rather than "having heard of a thread" before making your baseless assumptions. When two consenting adults mutually agree on terms that they believe are favourable to them and their situation, I don't call that tricking anybody. I call it an arrangement.
Actually, the Mods did give a reason different than your assumption.I have heard of a thread on here that was pretty bad. A lot of posts would explain how to trick a woman and give her less than she expected.
That’s probably why they don’t let you talk about it anymore
Seeing as the Mods did not say that, it is an assumption.Of course it did.
Without official confirmation, it is speculation on either side.Official version vs reality, which you alluded to in your own post.