Boobs, here's a quick recap of how you've fared in this thread.
Trump’s bid to block release of his tax returns rejected by federal judge
- Thread starter bver_hunter
- Start date
According to you? hahahahaha
Aren;t you and Frankfooter supposed to be exploring Uranus?
Listen boobs, you said that Trudeau violated the ethics regulations!! Meaning that Trudeau is guilty even though you do not have any proof as yet. I am betting that you do not have any proof presently. Show me the proof. Unless you think that Trudeau is guilty unless proven innocent. Answer this simple question that I asked you from day one. You are the one that is chicken. boobs you are beyond redemption!!
Okay we can bet on that, provided you are ready to bet on the fact that you currently do not have any proof that Trudeau is guilty of breaking the ethics rules in this WE investigation.
So, do you have the proof?? Are you also willing to bet that Trump will not be elected?? Otherwise, just walk away if you cannot agree to my bet!!
Are you daft?
The whole point of the bet is that I said there WILL BE proof of ethics violations when the investigation is completed. Bets are usually based on assumptions.
Your suggestion is similar to betting on a game that one person already knows the outcome.
I already said that for proof, the investigation needs to be completed, then there will be proof. You argued that there is no wrong doing . That's the whole purpose of the bet.
Why are you trying to wiggle out of the original details of the bet and change things now?
Do you accept the bet or not?
hahaha you are distracting again.
I bet you that Trudeau is guilty. The only way you or anyone will accept that is when the investigation is completed and proof of violations is shown. That is the only proof there can be. How can I prove it beyond a shadow of a doubt before then exactly?
That's the whole point of the bet since you believe there is no wrong doing and I do.
Stop distracting.
I bet Trudeau is guilty even though you believe he is not.
That's the bet.
So? Are you going to keep tap dancing? Or are you going to accept my bet?
I would say anyone who doesn't keep answering questions with questions.
That would be a lot of people. The only people that back you up are the voices in your head! Lol!
You have to name a crime.
Guilty of nice hair?
Guilty of Melania liking him more than the big cheezie?
You are just like a child when you cannot comprehend anything. In the first place, all I did is to ask you for proof that Trudeau violated any of the ethics. You said he did, so show it to us!!
Besides stating that he should have recused himself, from this appointment, tell us exactly what he is guilty of?? People do not bet on trivial crap like this. Well when you asked me to bet that he will in the future be found to be guilty, you then have zero proof that he is guilty when there is no real evidence yet. That is why I am betting that you do not even have any proof. You are then a liar!! That is because if a case has not gone before a court and you are stating that someone is guilty, then you have to show the proof in the first place. You are just a wasted space and band width. That is because you cannot accept the bet and the fact that currently he is not guilty until proven to be so!! So go ahead and accept this bet. We know you won't.
This whole bet shit that you started is a waste of time, but let us go for the real one where people around the globe take bets on them.
Are you willing to walk away from this Board if Trump loses the Elections?? I will do if Biden loses. Yes / No??
Wait no further. The arguments you make on most threads would be insulting to a 10 year old.
So does that mean you have an example of me name calling? You know, like Frankfooter does.
Or are you just scrambling for something to say?
ps your comment may explain why you are insulted.
You seriously think that Trudeau prorogued parliament and redacted emails because there was nothing to hide? Do you seriously believe that?
DO you seriously believe that the Finance Minister resigned because there was nothing else?
Trudeau's family received thousands of dollars before the contract was awarded. You don't think that constitues a violation?
There's my proof you keep crying about me not providing even though it's common knowledge. Hence why I believe you are distracting.
So?
Are you going to accept my bet that the Ethics Commissioner will find wrong doing? Yes or no.
And for at least the 3rd time I have already said I would accept your bet if you accept mine. Why do you keep asking me over and over? Distracting again?
Total failure.
Zero proof.
Zero accusations of any specific wrong doing, instead listing things cleared by the government.
Total failure.
