Woman apologizes after video goes viral of her calling police on black birdwatcher

[Smallcock]

Buddy, I think you're writing a novel in your head and getting a little too carried away with your own thoughts.

Maybe a little holiday from TERB for 2-3 days....

I think you need to brush up on American history. This isn't new. Same shit, different time period.

 

[Darts]

This reminds me of the Henry Louis Gates incident.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Henry_Louis_Gates_arrest_controversy

 

[Uncharted]

So, now since he recorded the second part of the confrontation but she did not recorded the first part that could have explained why she felt threatened, it is OK to lynched her?

Did you watch the video?

She actually threatened him with lying to the police.

She was a good 20 feet away from him and kept demanding that he stop recording her. An act that is neither illegal, nor threatening.

She then aggressively approaches him and repeats the demand.
The man responds by backing further away from her, and asks her to please not come close to him.

She continues to aggressively approach him closer repeating the same demand to stop recording her.
She then makes the threat that if he does not stop recording her she will call the police and "tell them there is an african american man threatening my life."
Something both he and she knows very well was not presently happening.

And the way she made the threat was very telling, she didn't say it with fear in her voice, it was with malice. She was making a power play.

This bitch threaten this man with lying to the police about his actions, in order to intimidate him to stop doing something she didn't like, yet he had every legal right to do.

Then she tries to claim in her so called apology, that she was afraid? She didn't look very afraid when she kept aggressively advancing on him and threaten to lie to the police in order to get her own way.

But yes, lets always believe the woman.

 

[canada-man]

remember rosewood

 

[fall]

Nothing remotely suggests that Karen ever felt threatened at any point in time. I really don't understand where you're getting this. It's crystal clear that she felt emboldened, not threatened. Please don't get caught up in her fake narrative. Her claim to feel threatened after the video surfaced is classic poor white privilege female drivel. You have to be able to see through that. It's easy.

The fact that people STILL think she felt threatened because she says so after demonstrating the complete opposite ON FILM indicates why we have a LONGGGGGG way to go for equal justice.

WTF does she have to do to be guilty in your eyes after falsely accusing a black man of something he didn't do... pull out a firearm and shoot an innocent man dead?

How do you know that she did not felt threatened? How do you know that he did not threatened her (or sad something that she could have interpreted as a thread) before the video starts? Worming him about the 911 call could be hew way to warn him to stop do what he was doing. Noone can prove what had happened. As her words are not enough to say he was mostly at fault, his words and the video is not enough to say she was mostly at fault. When there is no definite proof, no one should get punished.

 

[apoptygma]

When there is no definite proof, no one should get punished.

Are you blind?
There is LOTS of 'definite proof'.
Definite proof that she is a liar.
Definite proof that she is a racist.
Definite proof that she is a white-privilege whore.
Definite proof that she is an animal-abuser.

 

[Smallcock]

How do you know that she did not felt threatened? .

By her actions and words - in other words every piece of evidence available to the 5 senses. She was the one doing all the threatening. The only thing she was threatened with was her privilege because a black man had the audacity to complain about her bad behaviour. Fuck her and everyone like her.

 

[Fradi]

Karen would kill in a heartbeat under the right circumstances. In fact, if the black man wasn't carrying a camera and this occurred decades ago, she would see fit that he get lynched.

These comparisons aren't strange. You just don't have the depth to make the connections.

So you know that Karen deep down is a murderer waiting to happen all this from a 2 minute video clip.
Of course you also know what Karen would have done if she was living decades ago.
You really do have a depth to you I agree. I just don’t want to sink that low.
Why do you waste all this clairvoyant talent on an escort review board, when you could be picking winning lottery tickets or if you go back decades to Salem you would of course know which are the right witches to burn, there would be many Karens to pick from.

Yes she is a racist bitch but comparing her to a murdering bastard like that cop is a real stretch.
She made a phone call and in the end ruined her own life, while this bastard cop actually killed an unarmed handcuffed guy.

 

[fall]

Are you blind?
There is LOTS of 'definite proof'.
Definite proof that she is a liar.
Definite proof that she is a racist.
Definite proof that she is a white-privilege whore.
Definite proof that she is an animal-abuser.

Actually, I am not blind and I cannot see proofs for any of your statements

1) She is a lier: I cannot see when when lied. She told the police that the African-american man threatened her and her dog and she is recording her. He definitely took action that could harm her dog (gave him some food without the owners permission that may be poisonous). He may as well threatened her before he started recording
2) She is a racist: I cannot see it, I see a women who is scared. Yes, she mentioned the race on the phone, however, it may be because it is a way to make sure the police will arrive sooner. Yes, she may be less scared if the man was not African-american, however, it may be not because of racism, but die to statistical data that larger proportion of reported incidents in the park involved African-american s
3) She is white-privileged whore: I did not see anywhere on that video indicators that she believes that if she would be black herself, she would be less scared or behaved differently. I also see no evidence that she sleeps with people for money
4) She is an animal-abuser: no, she was scared and kept dog as close as possible to avoid him eating the "treats" that the man provided and she also wanted to protect her dog from the man that threatened the dog by keeping him close. Yes, she may pull up on the collar instead of putting the dog on the leash right away, but she was scared and not all scared people behave rationally.

Anything else you think about that is so obvious from the video that there is no possible alternative explanation in which she is just a scared girl who found herself alone in the park with a man who may have yelled on her and tried to give something to her dog.

 

[J.A. Prufrock]

Actually, I am not blind and I cannot see proofs for any of your statements

1) She is a lier: I cannot see when when lied. She told the police that the African-american man threatened her and her dog and she is recording her. He definitely took action that could harm her dog (gave him some food without the owners permission that may be poisonous). He may as well threatened her before he started recording
2) She is a racist: I cannot see it, I see a women who is scared. Yes, she mentioned the race on the phone, however, it may be because it is a way to make sure the police will arrive sooner. Yes, she may be less scared if the man was not African-american, however, it may be not because of racism, but die to statistical data that larger proportion of reported incidents in the park involved African-american s
3) She is white-privileged whore: I did not see anywhere on that video indicators that she believes that if she would be black herself, she would be less scared or behaved differently. I also see no evidence that she sleeps with people for money
4) She is an animal-abuser: no, she was scared and kept dog as close as possible to avoid him eating the "treats" that the man provided and she also wanted to protect her dog from the man that threatened the dog by keeping him close. Yes, she may pull up on the collar instead of putting the dog on the leash right away, but she was scared and not all scared people behave rationally.

Anything else you think about that is so obvious from the video that there is no possible alternative explanation in which she is just a scared girl who found herself alone in the park with a man who may have yelled on her and tried to give something to her dog.

Damn, dude. Sounds like you're in love.

 

[fall]

Damn, dude. Sounds like you're in love.

Nope, I just love to argue and strongly against the "public opinion court"

 

[J.A. Prufrock]

Nope, I just love to argue and strongly against the "public opinion court"

But she's got a pretty mouth, don't you think? When she returns to Canada and finds a job, I figure we can get BBBJ, DATY, DATO, MPOS for $160 hh; CIM for an extra $20.

Give her advance notice and she'll probably accommodate costume fantasies:

 

[Darts]

alternative explanation in which she is just a scared girl who found herself alone in the park with a man who may have yelled on her and tried to give something to her dog.

If we can get past the hysteria and hyperbole, I think the likely scenario is that we have a woman, alone, in a secluded part of Central Park (where violence against women is not uncommon) confronted by a male probably much larger than herself. She was clearly concerned about her and her dog's safety and called 911.

 

[fall]

If we can get past the hysteria and hyperbole, I think the likely scenario is that we have a woman, alone, in a secluded part of Central Park (where violence against women is not uncommon) confronted by a male probably much larger than herself. She was clearly concerned about her and her dog's safety and called 911.

Yes. I doubt that if the man asked her nicely to put the dog on the leash, her response would be to call the cops. My guess, that even if he asked nicely the first time (although I am not sure that he did - having dog treats on him implies that he wanted to get confrontational) and she reply in the form of "get lost", he than said something to the effect "if you will not put the dog on the leash, I will do something that you do not like". Now, this is a threat. After that he starts calling the dog offering him treats. This can be viewer as an attempt to poison the dog. At that time the girl got scared that the guy wanted to poison her dog, and, probably, attack her after. Now, a scared person tries to defend herself. She did not have a gun, so she used the only weapon she had: call the police and play the race card to make sure the police will come sooner (and, hence, the guy will not have time to do all the bad things that she thought he will do based on his original threat). Yes, she may not have behaved most rationally, but she was under a lot of stress. And, strictly speaking, everything that she told the police on the phone is true. Note also, that it was the guy who planned this confrontation (otherwise, why he took the got treats with him). She was simply walking with her dog. Yes, the dog was supposed top be on the leash, however, her behaviour cannot be perceived as violent. Offering food to a dog while having heated confrontation with the owner can be seen as violent (trying to poison the dog), and it was premeditated. I'd say, it was the guy who was mostly at fault.

 

[Frankfooter]

Yes. I doubt that if the man asked her nicely to put the dog on the leash, her response would be to call the cops. My guess, that even if he asked nicely the first time (although I am not sure that he did - having dog treats on him implies that he wanted to get confrontational) and she reply in the form of "get lost", he than said something to the effect "if you will not put the dog on the leash, I will do something that you do not like". Now, this is a threat. After that he starts calling the dog offering him treats. This can be viewer as an attempt to poison the dog. At that time the girl got scared that the guy wanted to poison her dog, and, probably, attack her after. Now, a scared person tries to defend herself. She did not have a gun, so she used the only weapon she had: call the police and play the race card to make sure the police will come sooner (and, hence, the guy will not have time to do all the bad things that she thought he will do based on his original threat). Yes, she may not have behaved most rationally, but she was under a lot of stress. And, strictly speaking, everything that she told the police on the phone is true. Note also, that it was the guy who planned this confrontation (otherwise, why he took the got treats with him). She was simply walking with her dog. Yes, the dog was supposed top be on the leash, however, her behaviour cannot be perceived as violent. Offering food to a dog while having heated confrontation with the owner can be seen as violent (trying to poison the dog), and it was premeditated. I'd say, it was the guy who was mostly at fault.

Her dog should have been on leash.
How she was asked to obey the law shouldn't matter.

 

[fall]

Her dog should have been on leash.
How she was asked to obey the law shouldn't matter.

Really??? OK, imagine you are a small girl who drives in her car and toss out an empty coffee cup. Not a good thing to do. You may be even fined for it. Now, you stop on the next light and suddenly a car that was behind you moves forward, block you, and a huge guy get out of your car, opens door and start yelling at you that you should get out of the car and pick up the coffee cup. Would you say "yes sir, sorry sir, I will do it right away" No, any normal person will get scared, try to close her door, call the cops, and even slum the car in front of her and tries to get out. If the guy was still holding your door, he will be injuries. Now, will it be your fault (after all, you did litter and the guy simply asked your to pick up your trash in not-so-nice way)? There are minor offences and there are life-threatening situation.

The guy on the video did not perceive the dog as a life-threatening situation to him, while his behaviour was perceived (by the girl) as life-threatening situation to the dog and, possible, to the girl. So, how one asks to stop another from doing some minor violations matters. Polite: yes. Yelling: still acceptable (but not nice). Threats and doing something that can be seen as trying to poison a dog - hell no. And do not forget the he planned to do it (why else he took the dog treats with him). He wanted to "teach that bad dog owners" a lesson. And he chooses a small girl. I bet if there was a big guy instead of the small dog who could simply beat him up instead of calling the police, he would not try to pull this stunt.

 

[fall]

Her dog should have been on leash.
How she was asked to obey the law shouldn't matter.

To take it further, do you think it would be OK for him to take out a gun, aim on the girl and say: put the dog on the leash or I will do something you do not like. After all, she should have the dog on the leash and how she was asked to obey the law should not matter. Hell, maybe drivers should run over all pedestrians who try to cross the road on the red light: after all, they should wait their turn to cross.

The guy had no right to enforce the "leash law" by himself.

 

[apoptygma]

Nope, I just love to argue and strongly against the "public opinion court"

Thanks for admitting that you just argue for the sake of arguing, and that you have no legitimate rebuttal of my comments, aside from "I don't see it".

 

[black booty lover]

I think the most fascinating part about the story is they had the same last name.

 

[Smallcock]

So you know that Karen deep down is a murderer waiting to happen all this from a 2 minute video clip.
Of course you also know what Karen would have done if she was living decades ago.
You really do have a depth to you I agree. I just don’t want to sink that low.
Why do you waste all this clairvoyant talent on an escort review board, when you could be picking winning lottery tickets or if you go back decades to Salem you would of course know which are the right witches to burn, there would be many Karens to pick from.

Yes she is a racist bitch but comparing her to a murdering bastard like that cop is a real stretch.
She made a phone call and in the end ruined her own life, while this bastard cop actually killed an unarmed handcuffed guy.

It's not a clairvoyant talent. It's simply understanding human nature. Someone that shows a disregard for life due to race in one instance will also show the same disregard in other instances. Being a bad person and a cretin with poor judgement isn't a tap that you can just turn off.