Asia Studios Massage
Toronto Escorts

Woman apologizes after video goes viral of her calling police on black birdwatcher

Fradi

Member
Mar 22, 2017
173
7
18
Chibougamau
Karen is the mirror image of the police officer in this: https://terb.cc/vbulletin/showthrea...r-Minneapolis-police-officer-put-knee-on-neck

Only difference is level of education, gender, and employment type. That's the big picture conveniently overlooked by Oagre and friends.

Lots of Karen's and Carl's in this thread defending her perhaps because they feel more vulnerable than ever. In a matter of time, we will expose you too.
Are you nuts, Karen is a racist and a bitch and deserves to be exposed and all that happened to her as a result, but she didn’t kill anyone.
You really make strange comparisons all the time wtf.
 

derrick76

Well-known member
May 10, 2011
2,168
89
48
Toronto, ON
Actually, he admitted on his own social media post that he intimidated her before filming by saying, "If you are going to do what you want, then I will as well, and you are not going to like it" and proceeded to start throwing "dog treats" (that he just happened to be carrying while bird watching?!) at her dog. That is why she screamed stay away from my dog and was pulling the dog so viciously close to her, she was in protective Mama mode because he was openly fucking with her. Of course he stopped all that when he started filming her reaction though...

He isn't innocent, and yes she is a dick for having dog off leash, but hardly worth destroying her whole life over.
He admitted to 'throwing dog treats at her'? Or did she tell you this?

You think it was having her dog off leash that is causing her all this grief? That's all she did? Have her dog off leash?

You're going to ignore the fact she wasn't screaming as loudly as she approached him while he backed away?

You're going to ignore that she started to cry and scream as she said African American man is threatening me? This after she told him that she was going to tell the cops (let's say lie) that African American man was threatening her life?

He backed up as she aggressively approached the man threatening her life, while manhandling the dog she loves.

That part where she gets extra loud to the 911 operator. "SEND THE COPS"...like she was actually in the process of being beaten. That must have translated to 'shoot him on sight' to those ears.

Oh yeah, she knew what she was going.
 

fall

Well-known member
Dec 9, 2010
2,742
681
113
Well so far, she hasn't made any sort of statement indicating that he threatened, trapped or assaulted her. So based on evidence, he is blameless.

He's also a Harvard grad and in his 50's IIRC. Hardly a punk from the ghetto.
She cannot do so because she has no evidence. He conveniently started recording after he provoked her. "Innocent until proven guilty" means that such scenario was possible, hence, her guilt cannot be proven, and, hence, she is innocent.
 

y2kmark

Class of 69...
May 19, 2002
18,697
5,255
113
Lewiston, NY
Lots of attention to what is essentially a dog bites man story. Nice to see many people still care about justice and/or believe in Karma...
 

fall

Well-known member
Dec 9, 2010
2,742
681
113
He admitted to 'throwing dog treats at her'? Or did she tell you this?

You think it was having her dog off leash that is causing her all this grief? That's all she did? Have her dog off leash?

You're going to ignore the fact she wasn't screaming as loudly as she approached him while he backed away?

You're going to ignore that she started to cry and scream as she said African American man is threatening me? This after she told him that she was going to tell the cops (let's say lie) that African American man was threatening her life?

He backed up as she aggressively approached the man threatening her life, while manhandling the dog she loves.

That part where she gets extra loud to the 911 operator. "SEND THE COPS"...like she was actually in the process of being beaten. That must have translated to 'shoot him on sight' to those ears.

Oh yeah, she knew what she was going.
Actually, maybe he did threatened her life. Maybe she told her "I will first kill your dog and then beat the shit out of you". We do not know since there is no recording from the beginning of the incident. I do not believe he was always calm and she escalated the incident all on her own. Most probably, he was yelling and threatening her dog first, maybe even saying something "people like you should be put down" and then, once start recording, he becomes calm. We do not know that. There is no prove of anything. But people are happy to jump to conclusion.
 

fall

Well-known member
Dec 9, 2010
2,742
681
113
Lots of attention to what is essentially a dog bites man story. Nice to see many people still care about justice and/or believe in Karma...
My assume you really meant "care about the justice OR believe in karma". Because even if she was the only person who was wrong, what happened to her has nothing to do with justice (unless a Lynch law is the new justice system now)
 

derrick76

Well-known member
May 10, 2011
2,168
89
48
Toronto, ON
Actually, maybe he did threatened her life. Maybe she told her "I will first kill your dog and then beat the shit out of you". We do not know since there is no recording from the beginning of the incident. I do not believe he was always calm and she escalated the incident all on her own. Most probably, he was yelling and threatening her dog first, maybe even saying something "people like you should be put down" and then, once start recording, he becomes calm. We do not know that. There is no prove of anything. But people are happy to jump to conclusion.
And there YOU are jumping to conclusions with your own spin in order to justify her obvious racism.

What you said makes no sense though, based on what we saw. What we see is a woman aggressively approaching a man who seems effeminate, and he tells her to please back up. At no point did she say: "You're telling me to back up when you attacked me first?"

Here's a better interpretation/deduction than yours. He probably didn't threaten her life because she rushes him, telling him to stop recording her. He tells her to back up and that he won't stop. She says/implies 'oh, well I am going to tell the cops that a negro...sorry African American is threatening my life'. Translation - you're gonna get that black ass kicked and shot the fuck up. Just wait until my cavalry arrives. You messed with the wrong lady buddy.

Did you see the show she put on for the phone call? It was Oscar worthy.

Perhaps she flew off her rich entitled handle because this lowly person dared tell her what to do. Don't act like it's not possible, because it does happen all the time regardless of race.
 

derrick76

Well-known member
May 10, 2011
2,168
89
48
Toronto, ON
My assume you really meant "care about the justice OR believe in karma". Because even if she was the only person who was wrong, what happened to her has nothing to do with justice (unless a Lynch law is the new justice system now)
She called the police under false pretences, and racialised it knowing what would happen to the guy. Her intent was clear by racialising the 'attacker'....ooops recorder.

Was he (video) shooting to kill?
 

mandrill

Well-known member
Aug 23, 2001
71,567
71,427
113
She cannot do so because she has no evidence. He conveniently started recording after he provoked her. "Innocent until proven guilty" means that such scenario was possible, hence, her guilt cannot be proven, and, hence, she is innocent.

Sure she could. Simply go on social media and say: "Before he filmed me, he threatened to kick my dog. That's why I got so freaked out at him." Game changer!

Reason she doesn't say something like that is that it never happened and she's now calmed down, doesn't want to dig herself in deeper and might even feel ashamed she did what she did.
 

mandrill

Well-known member
Aug 23, 2001
71,567
71,427
113
Karen is the mirror image of the police officer in this: https://terb.cc/vbulletin/showthrea...r-Minneapolis-police-officer-put-knee-on-neck

Only difference is level of education, gender, and employment type. That's the big picture conveniently overlooked by Oagre and friends.

Lots of Karen's and Carl's in this thread defending her perhaps because they feel more vulnerable than ever. In a matter of time, we will expose you too.
Pretty bouncy today, Smally.

If you read my posts, I denounced the white oppressors in both threads. So picturing me as the cowardly superficial pseudo-liberal who shies away from attacking a fellow whiteskin pretty much misses the target. This says a lot more about you and your need to pre arrange the rest of the world into people you can feel justified in insulting and attacking - sort of like "Karen" and that cop, now I think about it - than it does about me.
 

fall

Well-known member
Dec 9, 2010
2,742
681
113
And there YOU are jumping to conclusions with your own spin in order to justify her obvious racism.

What you said makes no sense though, based on what we saw. What we see is a woman aggressively approaching a man who seems effeminate, and he tells her to please back up. At no point did she say: "You're telling me to back up when you attacked me first?"

Here's a better interpretation/deduction than yours. He probably didn't threaten her life because she rushes him, telling him to stop recording her. He tells her to back up and that he won't stop. She says/implies 'oh, well I am going to tell the cops that a negro...sorry African American is threatening my life'. Translation - you're gonna get that black ass kicked and shot the fuck up. Just wait until my cavalry arrives. You messed with the wrong lady buddy.

Did you see the show she put on for the phone call? It was Oscar worthy.

Perhaps she flew off her rich entitled handle because this lowly person dared tell her what to do. Don't act like it's not possible, because it does happen all the time regardless of race.
Yep, your story is possible too. And this is exactly my point: we do not know what happened before and if he provoked her or not. As a result, we do not have sufficient evidence to figure out if her behaviour was justified (she may be feared and, hence, was not able to think rationally. note that she did not say that he got violated, robbed, she simply say that she got threatened and it MAY be true, we do not know). And if we do not have sufficient evidence, she cannot be pronounces "guilty" and no punishment (such as public blaming or firing) should be carried. This is my point. Innocent until PROVEN guilty. Or do you want to live under the Lynch law?
 

Smallcock

Active member
Jun 5, 2009
13,703
21
38
Are you nuts, Karen is a racist and a bitch and deserves to be exposed and all that happened to her as a result, but she didn’t kill anyone.
You really make strange comparisons all the time wtf.
Karen would kill in a heartbeat under the right circumstances. In fact, if the black man wasn't carrying a camera and this occurred decades ago, she would see fit that he get lynched.

These comparisons aren't strange. You just don't have the depth to make the connections.
 

fall

Well-known member
Dec 9, 2010
2,742
681
113

Sure she could. Simply go on social media and say: "Before he filmed me, he threatened to kick my dog. That's why I got so freaked out at him." Game changer!

Reason she doesn't say something like that is that it never happened and she's now calmed down, doesn't want to dig herself in deeper and might even feel ashamed she did what she did.
How the fact that it happened or not happened affects what she could say? It may not have happened but still she can say it happened. Will you believe her? Will it be a "game changer"? What if it really happened? She has no proof. So, maybe it did happened but she is afraid that if she said so no one will believe her anyway. And since she has no prove, that guy may actually sue her. No one needs to prove that he/she is innocent, the burden of proof is on the other side and this video is not sufficient to proof anything: it simple shows scared young women who may genuinely feel that she is in danger (her feeling may be based on what had happened before the recording started)
 

Smallcock

Active member
Jun 5, 2009
13,703
21
38
Karen was obviously not afraid of the man. Stood their with that air of privileged superiority and confidence ready to sick the men in blue on the bad guy due to his race.

Nothing she says has any credibility. What's captured on film and was has transpired after tells the story in full.

This won't change Karen fundamentally. She won't become a good person. But she will be on her best public behavior henceforth.
 

fall

Well-known member
Dec 9, 2010
2,742
681
113
Karen would kill in a heartbeat under the right circumstances. In fact, if the black man wasn't carrying a camera and this occurred decades ago, she would see fit that he get lynched.

These comparisons aren't strange. You just don't have the depth to make the connections.
So, now since he recorded the second part of the confrontation but she did not recorded the first part that could have explained why she felt threatened, it is OK to lynched her?
 

canada-man

Well-known member
Jun 16, 2007
31,302
2,652
113
Toronto, Ontario
canadianmale.wordpress.com
Karen was obviously not afraid of the man. Stood their with that air of privileged superiority and confidence ready to sick the men in blue on the bad guy due to his race.

Nothing she says has any credibility. What's captured on film and was has transpired after tells the story in full.

This won't change Karen fundamentally. She won't become a good person. But she will be on her best public behavior henceforth.
black misandry 101
 

mandrill

Well-known member
Aug 23, 2001
71,567
71,427
113
I realize that this woman behaved badly.

But who hasn't?

I have. In my house,with my family, and in public, I have at times done or said things that afterwards I have regretted. I suspect that most of us here would say the same thing.

I believe that we have lost the idea of forgiveness today. One slip of the tongue (Don Cherry - THOSE people) and THAT IS IT. I find that that has to be hypocritical, unless the vast majority of the public are angels. It is soooo nice to pile on someone else - it makes us feel so righteous and good about ourselves!

Now, this woman is irritating to the extreme. I realize that. what a drama-queen bitch!

But who amongst us can say that there is not one moment in their lives in the past few years, which, if recorded, would not of gotten us into a lot of trouble?

I find it difficult to justify the total destruction of a life for the sake of a minute or two of verbal anger.

I agree. But you can't lose your temper like that in today's society.

Even in a private family context, flying at someone is going to have dramatic long-term repercussions. You are responsible for the way you behave.

I feel some sympathy for her. She's obviously worked hard and lived a good life up until now and she's pissed it away with 5 minutes of shitty, public behaviour. But you have to be responsible for yourself and your actions at all times.
 

mandrill

Well-known member
Aug 23, 2001
71,567
71,427
113
Karen would kill in a heartbeat under the right circumstances. In fact, if the black man wasn't carrying a camera and this occurred decades ago, she would see fit that he get lynched.

These comparisons aren't strange. You just don't have the depth to make the connections.
Buddy, I think you're writing a novel in your head and getting a little too carried away with your own thoughts.

Maybe a little holiday from TERB for 2-3 days....
 

Smallcock

Active member
Jun 5, 2009
13,703
21
38
So, now since he recorded the second part of the confrontation but she did not recorded the first part that could have explained why she felt threatened, it is OK to lynched her?
Nothing remotely suggests that Karen ever felt threatened at any point in time. I really don't understand where you're getting this. It's crystal clear that she felt emboldened, not threatened. Please don't get caught up in her fake narrative. Her claim to feel threatened after the video surfaced is classic poor white privilege female drivel. You have to be able to see through that. It's easy.

The fact that people STILL think she felt threatened because she says so after demonstrating the complete opposite ON FILM indicates why we have a LONGGGGGG way to go for equal justice.

WTF does she have to do to be guilty in your eyes after falsely accusing a black man of something he didn't do... pull out a firearm and shoot an innocent man dead?
 

Smallcock

Active member
Jun 5, 2009
13,703
21
38
If the cops came and the man ended up getting shot, would you still feel sympathy for her?

We all make mistakes, but not all mistakes are equal. To formulate and utter a direct THREAT against another person based on their race (note that she's a powerful educated middle aged person) is not how my brain works, because I'm not racist. She is.

She felt so confident in her authority and position of power that she took the time to verbally relay it to him in matter-of-fact tone even before calling the cops. These are not the actions of someone that is scared, threatened, or any other BS adjective that the sympathizers want to use to get Karen off the hook. Let's be sensible.
 
Toronto Escorts