DoFo government admits new licence plates 'absolutely' a problem, will need to be rec

apoptygma

Well-known member
Dec 31, 2017
3,042
100
48
Protecting Drug Ford's street hash dealer days makes you the BIGGEST hypocrite. But being a hypocrite must be a sport to you!!
Especially when boob expects you to abide by terms and conditions that you never agreed to, but he refuses to assume responsibility of the payday load that I don't want to pay.
 

bver_hunter

Well-known member
Nov 5, 2005
30,357
8,367
113
Especially when boob expects you to abide by terms and conditions that you never agreed to, but he refuses to assume responsibility of the payday load that I don't want to pay.
Absolutely true, as all that income that was illegal was not declared in his tax returns. That is if he ever filed any of them at that time. But he is still not a thief, even if taxes were evaded in Boober's playbook!!
 

Boober69

Well-known member
Feb 23, 2012
6,721
263
83
Stop trying to move the goal posts.
You are exposed as a hypocrite for excusing Ford's wasting of money and defending it here on a thread nearing 500 posts.
Not once did you say this was a waste of money or that you are upset about wasting taxpayers money.

You are a hypocrite.
Since when is issuing new license plates a waste of money? Government does it all the time. Liberals changed them in 2008.
In fact, from 1911-1972, they changed almost each year. After that, about every 5-7 years. Last time they changed in Ontario was 12 years ago. We were due.

Suddenly this government does it and you lose your shit? OMFG
 

Boober69

Well-known member
Feb 23, 2012
6,721
263
83
Not only has bver not been 'proven to lie', you can't even name what that lie is or document it.
Lame.
You guys are scrambling for comebacks and repeating yourselves because you have nothing left. A distraction tactic that is obvious.
I've provided proof several times and you guys ignore it. Then you just repeat the same statements.


A sure sign that you have lost this argument.
 

Boober69

Well-known member
Feb 23, 2012
6,721
263
83
Name calling?? You were the first to accuse me of being a "thief" / "hacker", then a "liar" and an "idiot", and subsequently a "hypocrite" to name a few!! So that is acceptable, or normal terminology to you??

Absolutely, nothing wrong with my grammar. Prove that it is wrong!! Just you and your outrageous name calling, along with very poor mathematical and comprehensive skills indicates your true colours!!

You are the LIAR, as I have proven it to be so starting with the manner in which you made those allegations against Trudeau and then denied ever starting that thread.

Since then, you have continuously stalked me, by throwing my name into the mix in several other threads that have nothing to do with the topics of their respective threads.
Apparently you can dish it out but can't take it. Want me to prove you started with the name calling first? Or will you just ignore that and start spewing distracting bs like you have been doing every time I corner you and expose your lies?
Stalked you? haha don't flatter yourself

The big man Bver who got caught in a lie and is falling to pieces! Mission completed.
I was going to say Frankfooter is next...but there's no challenge there. (sigh)
 

Boober69

Well-known member
Feb 23, 2012
6,721
263
83
Again you cannot comprehend the very simple fact. Yes I stated that I had access to that account whether you call it a shared account or not.

But where did I deny in anyway that I had access to this account, whether you call it shared or not?? Show me, as I am still waiting.

Just stop lying on a constant basis!!
Are you playing stupid on purpose?
You first said you were "savvy" in getting the free articles by cleaning your computer. Then when I called you out on that you changed your story and said you were using a shared account...which is even worse because is clearly states that is prohibited the Star's Terms of Use.

In a matter of minutes you changed your story.

You can't even keep track of your own lies!
 

Boober69

Well-known member
Feb 23, 2012
6,721
263
83
Especially when boob expects you to abide by terms and conditions that you never agreed to, but he refuses to assume responsibility of the payday load that I don't want to pay.
Payday load?
Wtf are you talking about?
Are you pretending to be stupid or this is the apex of your intelligence?
 

Boober69

Well-known member
Feb 23, 2012
6,721
263
83
Absolutely true, as all that income that was illegal was not declared in his tax returns. That is if he ever filed any of them at that time. But he is still not a thief, even if taxes were evaded in Boober's playbook!!
Tax returns?

Oh I get it, this is where you continue to spew jibberish to distract from you being caught lying.


Carry on. I'll tune in again when you get it out of your system.
 

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
103,460
29,740
113
Since when is issuing new license plates a waste of money? Government does it all the time. Liberals changed them in 2008.
In fact, from 1911-1972, they changed almost each year. After that, about every 5-7 years. Last time they changed in Ontario was 12 years ago. We were due.

Suddenly this government does it and you lose your shit? OMFG
You don't think its a waste of money to design plates so faulty they have to be recalled and new ones made to replace them?
Obviously you have no clue about wasting money.

You guys are scrambling for comebacks and repeating yourselves because you have nothing left. A distraction tactic that is obvious.
I've provided proof several times and you guys ignore it. Then you just repeat the same statements.
And obviously you have no clue about proof since you've failed that task as well.

You accused me of lying and have yet to even say what you think I lied about or to provide any evidence.
You failed again.
 

apoptygma

Well-known member
Dec 31, 2017
3,042
100
48
Payday load?
Wtf are you talking about?
Are you pretending to be stupid or this is the apex of your intelligence?
Payday loan.
Sorry... didn't think a single character could confuse you so much... I will be more careful in the future, m'kay boob?
 

Boober69

Well-known member
Feb 23, 2012
6,721
263
83
You don't think its a waste of money to design plates so faulty they have to be recalled and new ones made to replace them?
Obviously you have no clue about wasting money.


And obviously you have no clue about proof since you've failed that task as well.

You accused me of lying and have yet to even say what you think I lied about or to provide any evidence.
You failed again.
You think the faulty plates were designed as faulty on purpose? Tell me what cost it will be to replace them? Tell me the amount of the "wasted money" you are referring to.
 

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
103,460
29,740
113
You think the faulty plates were designed as faulty on purpose? Tell me what cost it will be to replace them? Tell me the amount of the "wasted money" you are referring to.
They were designed and approved though incompetence.
You think its going to be free to replace them?
 

Boober69

Well-known member
Feb 23, 2012
6,721
263
83
I answered.
By the way, Druggie signed an NDA to keep costs from becoming public.
Do you think that was good for Ontario?
Still no answer...saying "I answered" is not an answer. Can you at least be less predictable to keep things interesting? Otherwise I will have no use for you and will have to find another gimp.
 

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
103,460
29,740
113
Still no answer...saying "I answered" is not an answer. Can you at least be less predictable to keep things interesting? Otherwise I will have no use for you and will have to find another gimp.
You really aren't capable of following along, are you?

1 They were designed and approved though incompetence.
2 Druggie signed an NDA to keep costs from becoming public.

Both your questions answered, you just didn't like the answers so refused to admit them.
 

Boober69

Well-known member
Feb 23, 2012
6,721
263
83
You really aren't capable of following along, are you?

1 They were designed and approved though incompetence.
2 Druggie signed an NDA to keep costs from becoming public.

Both your questions answered, you just didn't like the answers so refused to admit them.

haha still can't tell me how much money was "wasted"? Or are you avoiding that question altogether?

You have zero proof that any money was wasted and if the purpose of the NDA was to "keep costs from the public".

Once again, your hatred blinds you.
 

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
103,460
29,740
113
haha still can't tell me how much money was "wasted"? Or are you avoiding that question altogether?

You have zero proof that any money was wasted and if the purpose of the NDA was to "keep costs from the public".

Once again, your hatred blinds you.
I told you, druggie signed an NDA with 3M to keep those costs secret.
Only a total fat ass kisser would claim that replacing tens of thousands of poorly designed license plates isn't costing anything.
If you're so sure, prove it cost nothing.
 

Boober69

Well-known member
Feb 23, 2012
6,721
263
83
I told you, druggie signed an NDA with 3M to keep those costs secret.
Only a total fat ass kisser would claim that replacing tens of thousands of poorly designed license plates isn't costing anything.
If you're so sure, prove it cost nothing.
If you are so sure, prove it cost something.

Any company doing business with the government signs NDA's mainly for privacy and security reasons where public info could be visible by the 3rd party. If they didn't sign an NDA, you be screaming that he didn't follow standard procedure.
 
Toronto Escorts