Only Three Months Left For Planet Earth( and other false doomsday predictions)

Phil C. McNasty

Go Jays Go
Dec 27, 2010
26,843
4,952
113
Arnold doesnt seem too worried about global warming











 

oil&gas

Well-known member
Apr 16, 2002
13,477
2,055
113
Ghawar
Schwarzenegger has added a million dollar all-electric
Hummer to his SUV collection. He can drive his other
gas-guzzling SUVs guilt free with the money he has to
buy carbon credit.
 

Ginomore

Well-known member
Jul 8, 2011
1,023
480
83
Schwarzenegger has added a million dollar all-electric
Hummer to his SUV collection. He can drive his other
gas-guzzling SUVs guilt free with the money he has to
buy carbon credit.
I hope you’re being sarcastic.
 

canada-man

Well-known member
Jun 16, 2007
31,989
2,900
113
Toronto, Ontario
canadianmale.wordpress.com

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
91,836
22,240
113
Oh, Canadaman.

That's an endless supply of pointless, oil funded, memes.
You don't think you're actually making any points, do you?
 

canada-man

Well-known member
Jun 16, 2007
31,989
2,900
113
Toronto, Ontario
canadianmale.wordpress.com
Oh, Canadaman.

That's an endless supply of pointless, oil funded, memes.
You don't think you're actually making any points, do you?
using the oil funded logical fallacy is not an argument(when are you going to give up your car if you hate oil so much?) your climate alarmist buddies have 40 years of failed climate doomsday predictions




Wrong Again: 50 Years of Failed Eco-pocalyptic Predictions

https://cei.org/blog/wrong-again-50-years-failed-eco-pocalyptic-predictions
 

canada-man

Well-known member
Jun 16, 2007
31,989
2,900
113
Toronto, Ontario
canadianmale.wordpress.com

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
91,836
22,240
113
using the oil funded logical fallacy is not an argument
Pointing out that the oil industry has 1000's of times as much cash as scientific research and that they use it to post the crap you link to is not a logical fallacy.
Its an argument you refuse to address.

your climate alarmist buddies have 40 years of failed climate doomsday predictions
Not the ones I quote, you like to quote fake stories not scientific research.
Besides, 40 years ago the scientists at Exxon came to the same conclusion.

You think they were biased?
 

canada-man

Well-known member
Jun 16, 2007
31,989
2,900
113
Toronto, Ontario
canadianmale.wordpress.com
Pointing out that the oil industry has 1000's of times as much cash as scientific research and that they use it to post the crap you link to is not a logical fallacy.
Its an argument you refuse to address.


Not the ones I quote, you like to quote fake stories not scientific research.
Besides, 40 years ago the scientists at Exxon came to the same conclusion.

You think they were biased?


here is the latest false prediction from the LAT times are ypu gpoing to ignore this like you always do othwer links that pointed to you


Editorial: Climate change is already here. 2020 could be your last chance to stop an apocalypse

https://www.latimes.com/opinion/edi...hange-crisis-global-warming-part-1-story.html

try reading links instead of ignoring them. and quit being a hypocrite when you want people to read your links but refuse to read others
 

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
91,836
22,240
113
here is the latest false prediction from the LAT times are ypu gpoing to ignore this like you always do othwer links that pointed to you


Editorial: Climate change is already here. 2020 could be your last chance to stop an apocalypse

https://www.latimes.com/opinion/edi...hange-crisis-global-warming-part-1-story.html

try reading links instead of ignoring them. and quit being a hypocrite when you want people to read your links but refuse to read others
Can't read it, paywall.

And I knew you wouldn't answer the questions.
 

canada-man

Well-known member
Jun 16, 2007
31,989
2,900
113
Toronto, Ontario
canadianmale.wordpress.com
Can't read it, paywall.

And I knew you wouldn't answer the questions.
no you refuse to read it because you disagree with it

i already andswer your questions you ignore them claiming that the oil industry is funding opposition to climate alarmism is NOT an argument

and you refuse to answer my question on why you are ignoring 50 years of failed doomsday predictions


Doomsdays That Didn’t Happen: 50 Years Of Failed Climate Predictions

this is not behind a paywall


https://beforeitsnews.com/science-a...rs-of-failed-climate-predictions-2964956.html
 

canada-man

Well-known member
Jun 16, 2007
31,989
2,900
113
Toronto, Ontario
canadianmale.wordpress.com
OUR Planet Has Enjoyed 10 Warm Periods During The Past 10,000 Years




There is absolutely nothing unusual about today’s so-called global warming (or “climate change”).

Look at how many periods of warmth our planet has enjoyed during the past 10,000 years alone.

Civilizations flourished during those warm periods, and collapsed when they ended.

Did humans cause the Minoan warm period of of about 3,300 years ago?

Did humans cause the Roman warm period of about 2,100 years ago?

Did humans cause the Medieval warm period of about 1,000 years ago?

What about all of those other warm periods? Should we blame Fred Flintstone, perhaps?

Now look at where we are today (at the far right side of the graph).

If the downward trend in temperature of the past 3,300 years continues, we could be in a heap of trouble. While our leaders keep on wringing their collective hands over global warming, we could be blindsided by an ice age.

As far as I’m concerned, all this talk about human-caused global warming is sheer nonsense, if not downright fraud. The record shows that both periods of warmth – and periods of cold – hit our planet with almost consistent regularity.




Heatwave Of November 23, 1931




 

b4u

Active member
Jul 23, 2010
1,790
10
38
Awesome thread CM.

something to add to the collection. Bernie Sanders: 'Major Cities Going Under Water' in '8 or 9 Years' Due to Climate Change taken from the recent Dem debate

wont take long to debunk this one and add to your archives of failed predictions.

Also found a very interesting Open Letter to Greta Thunberg




Greta Thunberg:

You have declared yourself a leader and said that your generation will start a revolution. You have comported yourself as a credentialed adult and climate change activist who has fearlessly addressed politicians and world leaders. You have dropped out of school and declared that there isn’t any reason to attend, or any reason for you to study since there will be no future for you to inherit. You have, rather than attend your classes, been leading Friday Climate Strikes for all students in your generation across the globe. Your attendance at oil pipelines has been striking. There, you unequivocally declare that all oil needs to remain in the ground where it belongs.

I shall, therefore, against the backdrop of your activism, address you as an adult rather than as a child.

In September of 2019 you crossed the Atlantic in a “zero carbon” racing yacht that had no toilet and electric light on board. You made an impassioned plea at the United Nations in which you claimed that, “we have stolen your dreams and our childhood with our empty words.” You claimed that adults and world leaders come to young people for answers and explained in anger: “How dare you!” You claimed that we are failing you and that young people are beginning to understand our betrayal. You further declared that if we continue to fail your generation: “We will never forgive you.”

You have stated that you want us to panic, and to act as if our homes are on fire. You insist that rich countries must reduce to zero emissions immediately. In your speeches you attack economic growth and have stated that our current climate crisis is caused by “buying and building things.” You call for climate justice and equity, without addressing the worst polluter on the planet China; the country that is economically annexing much of Africa and Latin America. You dare not lecture Iran about its uranium projects -- because that’s not part of the UN’s agenda, is it?

You proclaim that we need to live within the planetary boundaries, to focus on equity and “take a few steps back” for the sake of all living species. You resent the hierarchical distinctions between human and animals and entertain no qualitative distinction between a monkey, a malaria-infested mosquito and a snarling hyena. You mouth slogans such as: “We have set in motion an irreversible chain reaction beyond control,” and you advocate for universal veganism on the Ellen DeGeneres show. You do not buy new clothes, and you don’t want the rest of us to either. You want us all to stop flying in jet planes without giving us an alternative as to how we would re-transform our financial and trading systems—to say nothing of our personal enjoyment of the world—without regression to a primeval era. Few can afford to cross the Atlantic in a $6M zero carbon yacht financed by rich people who made their wealth by the very means you condemn as loathsome.

There are a few things that we, the rational adults of the world who are not bowing to you like guilt-ridden obsequious Babbitts need to say to you, Greta.

First, we did not rob you of your childhood or of your dreams. You are the legatee of a magnificent technological civilization which my generation and the one before it and several others preceding it all the way to the Industrial Revolution and the Renaissance, bequeathed to you. That growth-driven, capitalist technological civilization has created the conditions for you to harangue us over our betrayal. It is a civilization that eradicated diseases such as small pox from the word, and that lifted millions out of abject poverty in a universe you think is dying and decaying. It assured you a life expectancy that exceeded that of your ancestors. Most likely by focusing on economic growth which you demonize, and scientific advancement, that civilization will further enhance a robust quality of life and health for your descendants.

Here is a hard truth to ponder, Greta: if the great producers of this world whom you excoriate were to withdraw their productivity, wealth and talents—in short—their minds from the world today, your generation would simply perish. Why? Because as children you have done nothing as yet, with your lives besides being born. This is what we expect of children until such time as they can be producers by learning from their elders. You are understandably social and ecological ballast. You are not yet cognitively advanced to replicate the structures of survival of which you are the beneficiaries.

Children are important installments on the future. We have invested in you. It is you and your smug generation which think they have nothing to learn from the older ones who are failing themselves. Whom do you expect to employ the majority of you if you have neither the job credentials or life competency skills to navigate the world? The future unemployable-skipping- school-on-Friday obstreperous children?

The truth, as one anonymous blogger aptly put it, is that your generation is unable to work up to forty hours per week without being chronically depressed and anxious. Its members cannot even decide if they want to be a boy or a girl, or both, or neither, or a “they.” They cannot eat meat without crying. I might add that your generation needs “trigger warnings” and “safe spaces” as pre-conditions for learning in school. Its members have a pathological need to be coddled and protected from the challenging realities of life. Your generation is the biggest demander and consumer of carbon spewing technological gadgets and devices. An hour without any of them and too many of you succumb to paralyzing lethargy. Your generation is the least curious and most insular set of individuals one has ever encountered. Your hubris extends so far that you think you have nothing to learn from your elders.

Yes, we have betrayed you: by capitulating the world of leadership to bored, attention-deficit children who spout bromides, platitudes and slogans that a rudderless and morally relativistic culture accepts because a significant number of its denizens have become intellectually bankrupt and morally lazy.

The logical endpoint of your ecological vision would see us living in primeval conditions eking out an existence in jungle swamps in which we would regard poisonous snakes and man-eating tigers as our moral equals. We would have to adapt ourselves to nature rather than adapt nature to meet our needs, like all members of civilized civilizations do. Your vision would see us foraging for mushrooms and plants without knowing which were inimical to our digestive systems. Under your system we would swelter from heat, die from rampant plagues and starvation because there will be no air-conditioning units, no sophisticated plumbing and irrigations and sewer systems, no anti-bacterial soap made from animal matter, no pesticides and chemicals to sanitize our food and drinking supplies: just one primordial swamp of human putrefaction.

If civilization is left in the hands of your ecofascist supporters we will be living in grass huts, drinking animal feces infested water, and shrinking in fear from polar bears instead of killing them for food when they attack us.

Greta, living in complete harmony with nature is the death of creativity. Understand this. All great civilizations were forged in the crucibles of proper exploitation of the earth. Those who lived on land with oil and did nothing with it never had a right to it in the first place. Non-usage of God’s resources is the cardinal sin because it results in the un-development of our human capabilities, and makes us indistinguishable from beasts.

Your generation needs to be taught the morality of wealth creation, rather than only parasitically benefiting from it. The only revolution you will lead is one into nihilism and civilization regression. You need to learn about the moral case for fossil fuel. You owe it to yourself to understand how as, Kathleen Hartnett White has detailed, the harnessing of the vast store of concentrated energy in fossil fuels allowed mankind, for the first time in human history, to escape intractable constraints and energy limits that had left all but the very privileged in total poverty and depravity. Before the Industrial Revolution all societies were dependent on a very limited flow of solar energy captured in living plants for subsistence needs such as food, fuel and shelter.

But we, the creative enterprisers, will not go back to the Dark Ages. Your philosophy can be summed up as follows:

What was good for my anthropoid ancestors is good for me. Do not rock the boat, or even build one as that will require cutting down a tree. Do not disrupt nature. Do not dare to see the earth as rightfully belonging to us. We don’t have the right to use our brains in a manner that can transform our needs into a material form. Let’s conveniently forget that production is the application of reason to the problems of survival. Let’s all diminish the grandeur of man and his luminous potential. Crush the Thomas Edisons of this world.

The apocalyptic world vision you hold has been a strip landing for those who have hated progress throughout history. Your apocalyptic predictions have been made for millennia, and, we’re still here. We will still be here long after you’ve grown up and we have forgiven you for skipping classes, thereby lowering the intelligence quotient of an entire generation.

*

Jason D. Hill is professor of philosophy at DePaul University in Chicago, and a Shillman Journalism Fellow at the David Horowitz Freedom Center. His areas of specialization include ethics, social and political philosophy, American foreign policy and American politics. He is the author of several books, including “We Have Overcome: An Immigrant’s Letter to the American People” (Bombardier Books/Post Hill Press). Follow him on Twitter @JasonDhill6.
 
Toronto Escorts