The Porn Dude
Toronto Escorts

Julianne Assange Arrested.

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
81,141
18,008
113
Or......

Only the Clinton Campaign rigged their primary. While the RNC ran a clean one. So there was nothing to report on.
The dem and Clinton emails showed no crimes or corruption. It showed a bit of politics, but nothing unusual.

But its not what was in the hacked docs, its the fact that Assange specifically released them to put Trump in power and fuck with the US election that's the problem.
 

Butler1000

Well-known member
Oct 31, 2011
28,844
3,485
113
The dem and Clinton emails showed no crimes or corruption. It showed a bit of politics, but nothing unusual.

But its not what was in the hacked docs, its the fact that Assange specifically released them to put Trump in power and fuck with the US election that's the problem.
But that's not where the charges are. The charges are over the Manning release of war crimes.

So do you think Assange should or should not be charged specifically for the release above?
 

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
81,141
18,008
113
But that's not where the charges are. The charges are over the Manning release of war crimes.

So do you think Assange should or should not be charged specifically for the release above?
I personally don't think he should be charged with the Manning releases, those are legit journalism/whistleblowing for the good of society.
But he should be charged with political interference for his work with Putin and Trump on hacking and releasing dem emails and timing it for maximum political interference.
 
O

OnTheWayOut

ASSange's lawyer is stating that yes he was involved in a Conspiracy. The Conspiracy to Journalism. Seriously, the hacking into emails and then selectively releasing them to interfere in the elections, just to benefit a certain candidate is about "Journalism"??
What if they released the emails for the reason of truth and justice and to benefit the American people? Oh, that doesn't fit your narrative, does it?
 

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
81,141
18,008
113
What if they released the emails for the reason of truth and justice and to benefit the American people? Oh, that doesn't fit your narrative, does it?
Then why did they do it one hour after the 'grab her by the pussy' tape came out, and why did Roger Stone get a 'job well done' message afterwards?
That fit your narrative?

And what evil doings did those emails reveal that the country needed to hear?
 
O

OnTheWayOut

Then why did they do it one hour after the 'grab her by the pussy' tape came out, and why did Roger Stone get a 'job well done' message afterwards?
That fit your narrative?

And what evil doings did those emails reveal that the country needed to hear?
Ask Bernie if there was no proof of evil doing in those releases ....... just because it was swept under the carpet by the Dems does not mean there was no wrong doing. I think it is important that everyone knows what was done, even if some liberals don't care. I don't expect you to agree as you like keeping your head in the sand.
 

bver_hunter

Well-known member
Nov 5, 2005
27,508
5,692
113
Or......

Only the Clinton Campaign rigged their primary. While the RNC ran a clean one. So there was nothing to report on.

Btw Assange is in no way being charged or held for anything to do with 2016.

The "charge" stems from his receiving documents from Chelsea Manning. Would you see Assange prosecuted solely for his outing of war crimes by the US military?
You claim that you take all newsmedia with a grain of salt. Yet you buy the narrative that the Clinton Campaign rigged their primaries. Yet no lawsuits have proven anything. We know that there are far more evil doings by Assange and Wikileaks in the manner in which all the emails were released and the Republican ones were hidden. There are Trump campaign staff and an attorney sent to jail or charged or still under investigation. One of the mid term elections won by the Republicans was proven to be rigged. There was a year long investigation that wasted taxpayers triggered by the whims and fancies and BS by the POTUS regarding rigged 2016 elections just because he thought that he should have won the popular votes as well. But once again a totally nothing burger came out of it. Yet you call the RNC running a "Clean One". You are hilarious and your debunked arguments are explained here and how Fox twisted and turned this whole saga over it's head!!

https://newrepublic.com/article/135472/no-dnc-didnt-rig-primary-favor-hillary

https://archive.org/details/FOXNEWS...Sunday_With_Chris_Wallace/start/3060/end/3120
 

Butler1000

Well-known member
Oct 31, 2011
28,844
3,485
113
You claim that you take all newsmedia with a grain of salt. Yet you buy the narrative that the Clinton Campaign rigged their primaries. Yet no lawsuits have proven anything. We know that there are far more evil doings by Assange and Wikileaks in the manner in which all the emails were released and the Republican ones were hidden. There are Trump campaign staff and an attorney sent to jail or charged or still under investigation. One of the mid term elections won by the Republicans was proven to be rigged. There was a year long investigation that wasted taxpayers triggered by the whims and fancies and BS by the POTUS regarding rigged 2016 elections just because he thought that he should have won the popular votes as well. But once again a totally nothing burger came out of it. Yet you call the RNC running a "Clean One". You are hilarious and your debunked arguments are explained here and how Fox twisted and turned this whole saga over it's head!!

https://newrepublic.com/article/135472/no-dnc-didnt-rig-primary-favor-hillary

https://archive.org/details/FOXNEWS...Sunday_With_Chris_Wallace/start/3060/end/3120
Actually the lawsuits proved it did happen. The DNC lawyers admitted in court that they rigged it. Because the DNC is a private entity and can change the rules as they wish. In their words they can "go I to a smoke filled back room and pick a leader".

Judge agreed it was legal. But that doesn't exonerated them in the court if public opinion. They lied to the primary voters. Donna Baissile confirmed that as well in her book. That Clinton bought it outright in 2015. That's the real reason Biden didn't run in 2016.

And yes the RNC was clean. Trump won when no one in the party leadership wanted him to. He won because the primary voters put him in.

Clinton won because the Superdelegates did.
 

canada-man

Well-known member
Jun 16, 2007
31,184
2,613
113
Toronto, Ontario
canadianmale.wordpress.com

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
81,141
18,008
113
Actually the lawsuits proved it did happen. ...

Judge agreed it was legal.
Legal.

No scandal, so you should stop whining.
Now I note that you also seem to think that the hacking of the dems and Clinton was legal, as you don't think Assange should be charged for that right?
In your mind, Clinton is guilty of something vague you can't define and Assange was a moral warrior for exposing nothing illegal and changing the course of the election.

Bernie would say you're full of shit.
 

Bumblaster

Active member
Nov 3, 2018
146
59
28
These leakers such as Assange, Snowden, Manning etc are just useful idiots for the enemies of the West...

How come they never release the secret classified intel of China & Russia? Because they know they would be dead men if they did....
 

Butler1000

Well-known member
Oct 31, 2011
28,844
3,485
113
Legal.

No scandal, so you should stop whining.
Now I note that you also seem to think that the hacking of the dems and Clinton was legal, as you don't think Assange should be charged for that right?
In your mind, Clinton is guilty of something vague you can't define and Assange was a moral warrior for exposing nothing illegal and changing the course of the election.

Bernie would say you're full of shit.
Just like Trump's election was legal and so you should stop whining too?

Point being the DNC are liars. They lied to people. And that is what got released. It's no different then NBC releasing the pussygate tape. Or any other release of information.

Btw you still haven't answered the question if whether you think Assange should be charged for publishing the Iraq war Info........
 

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
81,141
18,008
113
Just like Trump's election was legal and so you should stop whining too?

Point being the DNC are liars. They lied to people.
Holy shit, are you, the biggest Trump ass kisser on this board, really accusing the DNC of being liars?
As the person who excuses all 8,000 of Trump's lies to date every day on this board, this has to be one of your most Trumptardian statements.
Well done.
 

Butler1000

Well-known member
Oct 31, 2011
28,844
3,485
113
Holy shit, are you, the biggest Trump ass kisser on this board, really accusing the DNC of being liars?
As the person who excuses all 8,000 of Trump's lies to date every day on this board, this has to be one of your most Trumptardian statements.
Well done.
So do you think Assange should should be charged for the Iraq war information leak?
 

bver_hunter

Well-known member
Nov 5, 2005
27,508
5,692
113
Actually the lawsuits proved it did happen. The DNC lawyers admitted in court that they rigged it. Because the DNC is a private entity and can change the rules as they wish. In their words they can "go I to a smoke filled back room and pick a leader".

Judge agreed it was legal. But that doesn't exonerated them in the court if public opinion. They lied to the primary voters. Donna Baissile confirmed that as well in her book. That Clinton bought it outright in 2015. That's the real reason Biden didn't run in 2016.

And yes the RNC was clean. Trump won when no one in the party leadership wanted him to. He won because the primary voters put him in.

Clinton won because the Superdelegates did.
Once again read this link:

No, the DNC Didn’t Rig the Primary in Favour of Hillary:

https://newrepublic.com/article/135472/no-dnc-didnt-rig-primary-favor-hillary

Just because Fox News started this false narrative, you seem to buy it. There were no judges that claimed that "Hillary / DNC rigged the Primaries". Why do you not post a link and just make one random allegation after the other. Then you say that Trump was clean in the manner in which he claimed that he loved Wikileaks and asked them to release all the Clinton emails?? Trump's whole campaign with Wikileaks and The Russians helping his campaign says it all. His crooked campaign staff is proof that it was a corrupt campaign, and the tactics that were involved. Whereas the fact that Clinton won 3.7 million votes more than Sanders just proves the point that she was more popular among the Democrats.
 

bver_hunter

Well-known member
Nov 5, 2005
27,508
5,692
113
Just like Trump's election was legal and so you should stop whining too?

Point being the DNC are liars. They lied to people. And that is what got released. It's no different then NBC releasing the pussygate tape. Or any other release of information.

Btw you still haven't answered the question if whether you think Assange should be charged for publishing the Iraq war Info........
Are you saying that Trump and his Republicans are honest?? More than 9000 lies and counting, to the point that Trump now says that he knows "nothing" about Wikileaks and he trusts Putin over all the Intel Agencies. Wow, yet you a supposedly Sanders' supporter buys that most dishonest statement of Trump's!!
 

Butler1000

Well-known member
Oct 31, 2011
28,844
3,485
113
Once again read this link:

No, the DNC Didn’t Rig the Primary in Favour of Hillary:

https://newrepublic.com/article/135472/no-dnc-didnt-rig-primary-favor-hillary

Just because Fox News started this false narrative, you seem to buy it. There were no judges that claimed that "Hillary / DNC rigged the Primaries". Why do you not post a link and just make one random allegation after the other. Then you say that Trump was clean in the manner in which he claimed that he loved Wikileaks and asked them to release all the Clinton emails?? Trump's whole campaign with Wikileaks and The Russians helping his campaign says it all. His crooked campaign staff is proof that it was a corrupt campaign, and the tactics that were involved. Whereas the fact that Clinton won 3.7 million votes more than Sanders just proves the point that she was more popular among the Democrats.
Donna Braisille admitted it. So did the DNC when they fired Debbie Wasserman Schultz.

And the leaked Emails of John Podesta proved it all.

It's the truth.
 

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
81,141
18,008
113
Donna Braisille admitted it. So did the DNC when they fired Debbie Wasserman Schultz.

And the leaked Emails of John Podesta proved it all.

It's the truth.
OMG!

So yes, there were politics involved in picking the leader for the dems.
And they made a stupid choice.
Big f'ing deal.

There was nothing illegal or different from anything that happens with the GOP.
As opposed Trump, who will go to court as soon as he's out of office.
 

Butler1000

Well-known member
Oct 31, 2011
28,844
3,485
113
OMG!

So yes, there were politics involved in picking the leader for the dems.
And they made a stupid choice.
Big f'ing deal.

There was nothing illegal or different from anything that happens with the GOP.
As opposed Trump, who will go to court as soon as he's out of office.
I didn't say, nor have I ever said it was illegal.

But they still lied, took donations, and acted unethically. Why have a sham primary?

Still waiting for you to say you whether you think Assange should be charged for the Iraq leak......
 

Butler1000

Well-known member
Oct 31, 2011
28,844
3,485
113
Are you saying that Trump and his Republicans are honest?? More than 9000 lies and counting, to the point that Trump now says that he knows "nothing" about Wikileaks and he trusts Putin over all the Intel Agencies. Wow, yet you a supposedly Sanders' supporter buys that most dishonest statement of Trump's!!
I am a Bernie supporter. It was him that got screwed by the rigging.

And the nation when Trump was elected as a result.

When will you admit it was Clinton's fault Trump was elected?
 
Toronto Escorts