Are you finally going to accept that the bombs weren't a false flag or is the conspiracy theory still more appealing?
Officials: Explosive Device Found in NY Mailbox at Home of George Soros
- Thread starter bver_hunter
- Start date
Correct, and Rochelle Ritchie also blames Trump for it as well:
"While Twitter gives the threats a platform, Ritchie also blames President Trump, whom she says has created a tense political climate in which his supporters feel emboldened to act on their worst impulses."
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news...elle-ritchie-blames-twitter-trump/1779398002/
the only difference being that Trump actively promotes animosity towards his political rivals and the media with lies, slander, hate, fake threats of prosecution and veiled encouragement to violence..... remember "go ahead, I'll pay for your defense!" ??? But nice try, JC
How can 12 non-functional bombs be any sort of intent?? (assuming he meant to just scare everyone like he said)
If it had a potentially explosive chemical like these packages did, then the intention was to cause a certain scale of damage. This will be disclosed in the trial. If this was just to scare all the recipients of the packages, then in NO WAY would he have put these dangerous chemicals in the packages. If the chemical involved was just a "plain non explosive" powder then in they would not stipulate that his sentence could be as high as 48 - 58 years in jail. He probably would have faced a huge fine and short time in jail for mischief. Why these right wingers make excuses for this individual is beyond any reasonable doubt.
https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/how-do-bomb-squads-assess-a-suspicious-package/
Hold on a second, there. Slander, hate, promotion of animosity???? Are you describing the treatment candidate Trump and President Trump received from his political rivals and their friends in the media? Because it sure sounds like you do. But, can't tell these days, eh? After all, the "experts" told us he would never be elected, let alone last a year.
Seems to me he succeeded in inciting fear in a whole section of people who he politically opposed. Seems to fit the textbook definition of terrorism.
Um, sorry Phil but sending fake bombs is still terrorism. The intent was POLITICAL. That defines it as terrorism.
Just repeating accurately the words Trump speaks would get me accused of being a Trump basher. His own words and deeds are all that is needed to discredit the man. Then I could repeat the contradicting words the next day not to mention the false facts that he utters each hour whilst falsely accusing others of "fake news"......yet you want to paint him as the victim? That is hilarious!
You mean you're talking out yer ass......do you actually make the claim that Trump was attacked more by his political rivals (Clinton ) than he dished out? Donald created the cesspool of hostility and negative slander that now dominates , and took it to a new low of crudeness and a new high in terms of fabricated bullshit. Of course you talk past that, because you have no way to address it without being a fool yourself. Trump is your man, after all. #pathetic
I didn't make any claim except that the Scalise attempted assassin should not be blamed on Sanders. Apparently, by trying to link terror to Trump, you disagree. In what circumstances of personal integrity and logic- I do not know.
