It includes a summary of the science you don't understand
Look stupid
I most certainly understand science better than some loud mouth, high school drop-out who can not calculate a weighted average
Your refusal to click on it or to even consider the research once again shows that your position is not 'neutral'.
I clicked on it, read some of it. Impressive no doubt
I have never said they are wrong
I have also never said they are right
I was looking for the part which you said would change my position
This will clear up your misconceptions about 'extrapolation'.
I searched for extrapolation & found only one mention & that did not provide any indication there was not any extrapolation or estimations in any or all of the work
How can one state an ice core sample is 800,000 years old without extrapolation?
They do not come with a birth certificate
There were a lot of references "high confidence " which is supportive of your position, however as any scientist will tell you it is NOT ABSOLUTE otherwise they would have stated it was absolute
Funny how one almost never sees "absolute" in scientific papers
Why do you think that is moron?
Even "absolute zero" is only theoretical and thus far experimentally impossible to achieve
Perhaps you could enlighten us on that subject given your expertise in science?
Now lets dive into your statement
Shows that your position is not 'neutral'.
How can a paper show me my position is not neutral?
I saw no mention of my name in that paper
The word neutral is not even in the text
You can not seem to understand that
you do not get to define other peoples position
You are not a scientist and instead are a propaganda spewing bullshit artist who thinks he can lie often enough to convince others of his position
I have met several pathological lairs and just like you they think they can fool all of the people all of the time
Your character assassination attacks of scientists who do not support your position is despicable and requires a complete lack of integrity
Words do not describe how despicable and loathsome that is
Your scientific expertise is based upon cut and paste from the internet and your scientific understanding is limited to the propaganda value of your cut and paste routine
Any idiot can do that, so congratulations on reaching the peak of your potential as a slimy propaganda spewer
What is the value to society of someone who's goal is to mislead others and to manufacture a false climate of authority?
You've taken a stand and refuse to 'neutrally' assess the science, you've pre-ordained that you don't accept it.
Nope
I have never said they are wrong
I have also never said they are right
Neutral is a perfectly valid position to take in any case,.
More so when there are potential sources of errors, there are opposing views and particularly when a misrepresenting bull shit artist is telling me my position is not valid and his is absolute
you on the other hand refuse to accept another persons position of neutral & what is worse is you somehow think you have the authority to tell them a neutral position is not permitted
That is not science that is propaganda & the worse kind
What you truly understand about science would not fill a test tube
You prove that ever time you say a neutral position is not permitted