Surely it is the value to the purchaser that has increased, as she sees it, and thus motivated her to raise her asking price and re-negociate a deal not yet agreed to or concluded, but entered into on assumptions — by both sides — that didn't turn out to be true.Seems to me that Stormy parlayed her one saleable asset into $130,000. That one asset was that she had had an affaire with Trump and he wanted to pay her to keep her mouth shut. There's nothing "unfair" about that. She sold an asset at what appeared to be a fair, remunerative price at the time.
Now that the price for her asset has increased, she wants to set aside the deal and get that higher price.
I'm not seeing a victim here. I'm seeing a businesswoman who enjoys cheating as much as Trump does. My only sympathy is that she has to deal with brain-dead Trumpanzee fanboys harassing her on Twitter 24/7. OTOH, any publicity is good publicity.
Sorta like the poor farmer asking better than a dust-bowl price from the guy, when she finds out he's an oil company geologist whose test proves there's oil under the land, and she thanks the Good Lord the signature lines are still blank.
Maybe he should appeal to her patriotism. Or promise to recognize her as First Bimbo.
They may neither of them be nice folks but …. He's still the shyster in the deal.