Going to guess decorative - similar to UFC girlsAs a non-racing fan I just have to ask--did these ladies actually do anything, or were they purely decorative?
Purely decorative.As a non-racing fan I just have to ask--did these ladies actually do anything, or were they purely decorative?
They make the athletes work harder.Cheerleaders who can dance, wear nice but not risqué stuff, and actually do what their name describes are fine. Honestly anyone else who's decorative should be gone. I think they distract versus enhance an environment. So good riddance in this case.
I agree.Cheerleaders who can dance, wear nice but not risqué stuff, and actually do what their name describes are fine. Honestly anyone else who's decorative should be gone. I think they distract versus enhance an environment. So good riddance in this case.
So all models should be gone? Or are you specifically talking about models at events unrelated to fashion?Cheerleaders who can dance, wear nice but not risqué stuff, and actually do what their name describes are fine. Honestly anyone else who's decorative should be gone. I think they distract versus enhance an environment. So good riddance in this case.
If you are a lazy over weight hag filled with jealousy and self-hatred - all models !So all models should be gone? Or are you specifically talking about models at events unrelated to fashion?
As a non-racing fan I just have to ask--did these ladies actually do anything, or were they purely decorative?
Going to guess decorative - similar to UFC girls
I was mainly referring to sports. For example (and I know this isn't a sport) but the Royal Flush Girls on the World Poker Tour. Absolutely unnecessary. I understand certain things where sex is used to sell but in some cases it's not needed. If I attend an event, it's mostly because I'm interested in the event/sport/players, not the "distractions". I certainly enjoy mascots, especially ones that do something comical.So all models should be gone? Or are you specifically talking about models at events unrelated to fashion?
Next thing you know, I'll be asked to remove my sig pic. lolIf you are talking a model at a car show, again, do they need to be skimpy? No they don't. Women can be dressed tastefully and sell something perfectly well.
This is an escort review board so there's no problem with it. And yours is mild in comparison to some others. Time and place bud.Next thing you know, I'll be asked to remove my sig pic. lol
Reminds me of the expression ... ' I'm not a racist but ...' I'm sorry but you are by your own definition - a prude. Women can be dressed tastefully ? ... how do you define tastefully ? ... no bare knees in view ? ... ankles should be covered ? ... your boner looking at them stays under 15 degrees ? Can they look sexy ? pretty ? I like beautiful women and putting them in costumes to add yet another layer of fun to any event is great in my mind.If you are talking a model at a car show, again, do they need to be skimpy? No they don't. Women can be dressed tastefully and sell something perfectly well.
I'm no prude - but I personally feel it's unnecessary. Similarly, don't think female athletes require skimpy outfits either. If I'm watching them, I'm interested in the sport. I think it's sad when people talk about the outfit Serena Williams is wearing at a tennis tournament.