Once again, Fuji cites a paper he doesn't understand.
The authors of that paper explicitly stated that they only looked at CO2 -- and
didn't look at water vapour feedback, which is responsible for the overwhelming majority of the warming that was predicted in the computer models.
Furthermore, the newly released, peer-reviewed paper on AGW makes it quite clear that the assumptions about water vapour feedback were wrong and the computer model predictions were "substantially larger" than the observed results.
https://www.nature.com/ngeo/journal/vaop/ncurrent/full/ngeo2973.html
The models got it completely wrong. There is no evidence of man-made warming.