Trump hit on Salma Hayek although she had a Boyfriend at that time.

[fuji]

Just about everywhere I can think of IF a woman made a complaint to police, and you were convicted.

Merely saying that you think it is a great idea, or even saying you have done it, may label you as a boor, but you aren't going to be imprisoned for saying it.

Wait I'm confused, on multiple threads recently you have insisted merely being legal wasn't the bar. Now you're justifying this horrifically immoral behavior by saying that he got away on a technically?

It's like Wimbledon watching you flip back and forth between these positions, my neck is getting whiplash trying to keep up!

 

[Insidious Von]

Having worked with a number of Celebrities over the years, as well as several big business guys(im a peon, this isn't a brag) I can say this isn't uncommon. Lots of Alpha Males who don't thing the rules apply. And could give a rat's ass about wedding rings.

As well, Donald has never put himself out there as a paragon of virtue. And considering the nature of the posters here I think a whole lot of us would happily have banged Selma Hayak, boyfriend or no boyfriend. And taken the shot at it given the opportunity.

Considering the endless bounty of gorgeous women on Earth, would hitting on Salma have been worth it. I'd rather not, not have to talk about Fight Club.

 

[Butler1000]

Considering the endless bounty of gorgeous women on Earth, would hitting on Salma have been worth it. I'd rather not, not have to talk about Fight Club.

Yep. I think it would have been........

Sometimes the fact it's forbidden fruit just makes it that much more desirable. And with the Alpha Males they love the chase.

What he did was weasely. No doubt there. And usually I'm very much in the "keep yer hands off when it isn't single" camp.

But damn, there wasn't a ring, so why not?

 

[Aardvark154]

Wait I'm confused. . .

Gee I'm shocked, shocked I tell you!

 

[slowandeasy]

The ones that participated did so with their consent and were hitting on him ever since until they realised that he was going to stay on with his wife. Errr heard of Monica Lewinsky?

Lol. Your bias is shameless.

How many charges have been laid against Trump?

Thanks for bringing up Monica. Nothing like an old guy using a young interns infatuation to take advantage of her. By your logic is ok for every single executive or teacher to take advantage of their employee or student.

 

[bver_hunter]

OK. Hitting on someone is not a crime ok. How the hell did it become a bad thing.

It's only harassment if you don't want the attention. Who knows if she was flirty and led him on.

And like I said it's Selma Hayak. Did you see her in From Dusk Till Dawn? You'd have to be gay not to want a shot at that!

Trump did not stand a chance with Selma Hayak. She had a boyfriend at the time, and if that was the scenario then you have to respect it and keep your distance, unless she hits on you. Clearly she did not hit on that Trumpty Dumpty nutcase. Off course guys who are ignorant dumbasses will continue to hit on that woman regardless of whether she is hot or not. So you support this Trump dude who did so.

 

[bver_hunter]

Lol. Your bias is shameless.

How many charges have been laid against Trump?

Thanks for bringing up Monica. Nothing like an old guy using a young interns infatuation to take advantage of her. By your logic is ok for every single executive or teacher to take advantage of their employee or student.

Fine one to talk about "bias". Your support for this moron called Trump knows no bounds. Yes Monica's encounter was 100% consensual. Who was the one that said that he grabbed the women by the "p*****"? He boasted about how he touched up the women, and was calling them all sorts of derogatory names. This was not in a "locker room" but on an official business bus that was bound for an official event. All the passengers and crew were no buddies of his, were they?

 

[Anbarandy]

Having worked with a number of Celebrities over the years, as well as several big business guys(im a peon, this isn't a brag) I can say this isn't uncommon. Lots of Alpha Males who don't thing the rules apply. And could give a rat's ass about wedding rings.

Oh, so you're an event planner or a manicurist?

 

[slowandeasy]

Fine one to talk about "bias". Your support for this moron called Trump knows no bounds. Yes Monica's encounter was 100% consensual. Who was the one that said that he grabbed the women by the "p*****"? He boasted about how he touched up the women, and was calling them all sorts of derogatory names. This was not in a "locker room" but on an official business bus that was bound for an official event. All the passengers and crew were no buddies of his, were they?

Please go back and look at my posts in this and many other threads and point out where you feel that I blindly support Trump. If you are too lazy to do the research, go back to post 11 in this thread. Look at the last sentence.

Mostly what I post is my objection to hypocrisy.
You cannot even see the blatant hypocrisy in your post above as you try to justify Clintons actions. Nevermind that workplace sexual harassment laws are in place for a reason, you are actually justifying a President having real sexual encounters in the white house, but draw the morality line at a guy TALKING like a pig?

Do you need me to explain it? If you shit on Trump (which you rightfully should) then you should be equally critical of Clinton. Otherwise you are just another partisan fool whose blindness enables our politicians to continue doing a crappy job of running our country.

 

[Butler1000]

Oh, so you're an event planner or a manicurist?

I will happily cop to being a lowly peon. Someone who's goal in life is not to be googlable.

And having a lot of direct contact, sometimes for moments, sometimes for months.

But please don't lump me in with that most useless of professions....."event planners". I actually did work for a living. I'll take the manicurist accusation with grace, but not that!

 

[Butler1000]

Trump did not stand a chance with Selma Hayak. She had a boyfriend at the time, and if that was the scenario then you have to respect it and keep your distance, unless she hits on you. Clearly she did not hit on that Trumpty Dumpty nutcase. Off course guys who are ignorant dumbasses will continue to hit on that woman regardless of whether she is hot or not. So you support this Trump dude who did so.

How do you know? There have been some pretty odd couplings over the years. Remember Billy Bob and Angelina. Lots of others. Trump, despite being an ass, has had a lot of hotties over the years.

And partially because he had the balls to try.

 

[bver_hunter]

Please go back and look at my posts in this and many other threads and point out where you feel that I blindly support Trump. If you are too lazy to do the research, go back to post 11 in this thread. Look at the last sentence.

Mostly what I post is my objection to hypocrisy.
You cannot even see the blatant hypocrisy in your post above as you try to justify Clintons actions. Nevermind that workplace sexual harassment laws are in place for a reason, you are actually justifying a President having real sexual encounters in the white house, but draw the morality line at a guy TALKING like a pig?

Do you need me to explain it? If you shit on Trump (which you rightfully should) then you should be equally critical of Clinton. Otherwise you are just another partisan fool whose blindness enables our politicians to continue doing a crappy job of running our country.

Listen, you are not putting on your listening ears. The thread is about a lady who was being hit on in spite of having a boyfriend by a guy who was then being disrespectful with his actions to the lady as well as words about the boyfriend. Absolutely, no class shown by the guy involved. Now Clinton's affair was about consensual sex, when President of the USA, something that he really should not have involved himself with due to the scrutiny of the press and public in general. These kind of charades happen generally in everyday lives including those on this board. There was a lawsuit brought against him and he paid the price for doing so. There were no charges although he was initially impeached for it. Trump's lawsuits are still in the works and we have to keep an open mind to them.

 

[Butler1000]

Listen, you are not putting on your listening ears. The thread is about a lady who was being hit on in spite of having a boyfriend by a guy who was then being disrespectful with his actions to the lady as well as words about the boyfriend. Absolutely, no class shown by the guy involved. Now Clinton's affair was about consensual sex, when President of the USA, something that he really should not have involved himself with due to the scrutiny of the press and public in general. These kind of charades happen generally in everyday lives including those on this board. There was a lawsuit brought against him and he paid the price for doing so. There were no charges although he was initially impeached for it. Trump's lawsuits are still in the works and we have to keep an open mind to them.

Are you actually going to say that if Trump had an affair with a WH intern You would defend him?

Let me see you print that. I dare ya.

 

[bver_hunter]

How do you know? There have been some pretty odd couplings over the years. Remember Billy Bob and Angelina. Lots of others. Trump, despite being an ass, has had a lot of hotties over the years.

And partially because he had the balls to try.

Again, you are making excuses for the lack of class displayed by Trump. Sure, hit on a woman if you are connecting with her and there is a certain chemistry between the two of you. But, continuing to do so in spite of zero chemistry and then slating the boyfriend as a last ditch effort makes no excuses for this type of behaviour. Period.

 

[bver_hunter]

Are you actually going to say that if Trump had an affair with a WH intern You would defend him?

Let me see you print that. I dare ya.

Again you are not listening to what I am saying. He is the President and should "not" do so when he is in office although he is not breaking any laws. If the intern hits on him once he is no longer President then who cares, as he is free to do what he then wants as long as it is consensual and not just grabs them by the "p****". Okay?? So you would be okay if he did grab them by the p****, yes. Let me see you print that. I dare you.

 

[slowandeasy]

Listen, you are not putting on your listening ears. .

Dude please stop... this is getting embarrassing.

I see that no amount of logic or reason will deter you from your hypocritic oaths. We have established the fact that Trump hitting on Hayak lacked class. Are you expecting him to be lynched?

"Clinton's affair was about consensual sex, when President of the USA, something that he really should not have involved himself with due to the scrutiny of the press and public in general"
I realize you don't see the hypocrisy in this statement while you have already convicted Trump before the trial (are there any trials or charges that have been brought forth?).

What Clinton did was as bad as Trump's "grab them by the pussy", in fact its worst because Clinton did it while in office, and married at the time. You want to talk disrespectful? Classless?
Worse, Clinton lied under oath..

Now, to be clear, I think Clinton was a good president.

 

[slowandeasy]

Again you are not listening to what I am saying. He is the President and should "not" do so when he is in office although he is not breaking any laws. If the intern hits on him once he is no longer President then who cares, as he is free to do what he then wants as long as it is consensual and not just grabs them by the "p****". Okay?? So you would be okay if he did grab them by the p****, yes. Let me see you print that. I dare you.

This is where your argument fails because your argument is built on justifying Bill Clinton's actions rather than standing on proper moral ground.
It is not OK for someone in a position of power to have or not have sexual relations with women who are working for them (directly or indirectly).

Guaranteed that if Trump has a consensual affair at the White House, you would be the first to want to crucify him.

 

[Butler1000]

Again you are not listening to what I am saying. He is the President and should "not" do so when he is in office although he is not breaking any laws. If the intern hits on him once he is no longer President then who cares, as he is free to do what he then wants as long as it is consensual and not just grabs them by the "p****". Okay?? So you would be okay if he did grab them by the p****, yes. Let me see you print that. I dare you.

If it's consensual then anyone can grab anything they damn well please.

Show me where he actually did it? He was being a jackass and braggart and goof.

Clinton did. And committed perjury too boot! And it was one incident. He was well known for it. The only difference is he was caught bragging about it. That's it. Wanna bet he engaged in a ton of locker room talk as well and it's just not being recorded illegally and rehashed ten years later by a member of the BUSH family.

Bet his payoff was huge for that little hit job.

Just quit with the double standard. What Trump did via sexual exploits he never lied about to advance his political career. It was all as a private citizen. Clinton couldn't help himself in office and lied and was impeached for it.

Either way honestly I could give a rat's ass about who a politician fucks. I don't think it as a rule affects job performance.

But it's when they try to claim to be paragons of virtue that the issue arises. And one thing Trump hasn't done is claim to be that.

 

[SuperCharge]

This is where your argument fails because your argument is built on justifying Bill Clinton's actions rather than standing on proper moral ground.
It is not OK for someone in a position of power to have or not have sexual relations with women who are working for them (directly or indirectly).

Guaranteed that if Trump has a consensual affair at the White House, you would be the first to want to crucify him.

Very well said.

If it's consensual then anyone can grab anything they damn well please.

Show me where he actually did it? He was being a jackass and braggart and goof.

Clinton did. And committed perjury too boot! And it was one incident. He was well known for it. The only difference is he was caught bragging about it. That's it. Wanna bet he engaged in a ton of locker room talk as well and it's just not being recorded illegally and rehashed ten years later by a member of the BUSH family.

Bet his payoff was huge for that little hit job.

Just quit with the double standard. What Trump did via sexual exploits he never lied about to advance his political career. It was all as a private citizen. Clinton couldn't help himself in office and lied and was impeached for it.

Either way honestly I could give a rat's ass about who a politician fucks. I don't think it as a rule affects job performance.

But it's when they try to claim to be paragons of virtue that the issue arises. And one thing Trump hasn't done is claim to be that.

Couldn't have said it any better.

 

[bver_hunter]

Dude please stop... this is getting embarrassing.

I see that no amount of logic or reason will deter you from your hypocritic oaths. We have established the fact that Trump hitting on Hayak lacked class. Are you expecting him to be lynched?

"Clinton's affair was about consensual sex, when President of the USA, something that he really should not have involved himself with due to the scrutiny of the press and public in general"
I realize you don't see the hypocrisy in this statement while you have already convicted Trump before the trial (are there any trials or charges that have been brought forth?).

What Clinton did was as bad as Trump's "grab them by the pussy", in fact its worst because Clinton did it while in office, and married at the time. You want to talk disrespectful? Classless?
Worse, Clinton lied under oath..

Now, to be clear, I think Clinton was a good president.

Put on your listening ears. It is like whipping a dead horse. Again you do look at the context in which he talked about grabbing their P****. He mentioned that as a celebrity, he had every right to do so consensual or not. Do you get it now?
Again I said that Clinton was wrong to perform any sex outside of his marriage while in office, as it is not right morally. He paid the price by attempts to impeach him and the out of court settlements. Trump paid out of court settlements on his fake University and the race allegations of his property rentals.

There are lawsuits pending against Trump that will take the back seat for now. I said let's keep an "open mind". Not saying that he is guilty just yet. Okay? Now you get it, do you???