The Next PM of Canada
- Thread starter SkyRider
- Start date
Me too. I think he would have been much more electable in Ontario. Scheer is a good man but he lacks persona. Needs to work on image and delivery. They will also make him out to be a bogeyman because of his social conservatism.
Who cares what you you think about Kevin O'Leary's non prediction. Trudeau has a degree in Literature and another in Education. He does not need "handlers" to explain anything. Leitch maybe a doctor, but when it comes to politics, she was dumb to follow the Trump psychology in anti-immigration politics, and being a so called practising Catholic, those beliefs are contrary to what the Pope and the Catholic Church stands for. Maybe you should tell her to stick to medicine or offer her your "handling services".
We know you hate the day that Trudeau absolutely annihilated your predictions. So you love what Leitch stood for in her campaign speeches? Yes? What exactly is your argument? You come out with the irrelevant debt nonsense that happened under Harper anyway.
Hmm, so you are the arbiter of who is an active Roman Catholic, and who is only a "so called" Roman Catholic?
Also interesting to know that Roman Catholics must mindlessly behave in lockstep, perhaps that works in Rome, but in the United States and Canada if that sort of litmus test was applied there would be no Roman Catholic laity.
Now perhaps one can say that some have more clout than others but it is notable that the Cardinal Archbishop of Boston presided at Senator Kennedy's funeral and he was very far from towing the Vatican line.
If you cannot understand the whole hypocrisy of her stand in this elections there is no point explaining it to you. No wonder she got just 7% of the votes for something that is not about what Canada stands for. This goes against her Catholic values as well. Does not need an "arbiter" to get into the mix. We know that the alt right like you who shares those values are bitterly disappointed.
At this point Trudeau's qualifications are "effective, capable prime minister who is politically savvy". Whatever you think of his policies he's done a good job navigating the issues and dealing with Trump.
You and the other con men here serially underestimate him. You underestimated him throughout the election campaign and your predictions since then have been wildly wrong too.
Which is great: keep doing that!
Nobody cares
That qualifies him to lead a country?
it does qualify him to think " The budget will balance itself"
Do not kid yourself , he most certainly does
Again you should attacked her on the issues and leave Trump , the Pope and the Catholic Church (or any other irrelevant person) out of this
Re immigration: Time will tell if Justin is extremely naïve, lets hope it does not cost any Canadian lives
Maybe you should have the discussion with her, if she bothers you so much.
I have no big issues with Keely Leitch
I do defiantly regret the day he was elected, lects hope the damage he does in four years is minimized
Not really,
I do think we need to be far more careful wrt immigration, specifically from areas where religious fanatics are looking to hurt others
I simply pointed out you called an obviously intelligent lady dumb
She is far more intelligent than you are
Case in point
Anyone with even a simple understanding of debts / deficits knows what you just stated is a partisan half truth.
The PCs prudently ran a tactical deficit in response to the worst economic crisis since the great depression. They also had and executed a plan to bring the budget back to balance
The liberals run deficits as a matter of policy. Justin has never had to worry about money and he has no reservations about spending more than taxpayers can afford. (Granny Wynn is even worse)
This is an extremely irresponsible policy and places a huge burden on our kids, grandkids and generations which have yet to be born.
I have yet to hear a sound logical counter argument from the liberals wrt debt
They just prefer to ignore it or inaccurately point out the Harper deficits as justification.
Once again your usual nonsense throwing Trudeau and now Wynn into the equation. Silly arguments.
I have no problem with Leitch losing. It is game, set and match to her dumb campaign that only you as part of the 7% agree with.
Trudeau is still popular in the polls and your usual scaremongering means nothing to me.
If you do not like Trudeau's policies go back to your Mama's basement and let her put you to bed and sing the "Soft Kitty, Warm Kitty" to you.
You will need it as you will realise that Trudeau is smarter than you. If you live in denial to it, why is it he is a PM and Mama is trying to put you to bed?
http://www.citynews.ca/video/2017/02/27/video-kellie-leitchs-video-on-canadian-values-causes-uproar-on-social-media/
Watch Kellie speak and tell us again how intelligent she is, LaRue...LOL
Watch Kellie speak and tell us again how intelligent she is, LaRue...LOL
However he does whatever he does, he needs to remember two things: The Folly of Joe Clark, announcing he'd treat his bare win as a real majority, and the fact that his own majority over Bernier is a not a mere .05%, but .05% of the second choices. The lead Bernier kept to the last count but one, was built on being the first choice of a great many, and whoever his folks ranked as their next choices, Scheer got not one of them.
An election of a single person to a single job, by its nature must be winner-take-all. But even so, the next day it's about erasing those differences and finding the compromises and shared ground. Tough job
More relevant then your injection of the loonie Trump into the equation
Who is silly now
1. That is a flawed argument
She received 7% of first choice ballots which does not at all represent the % of conservative party members who reject or support her positions on Canadian Values.
It only indicates the % who had her as their first choice
2 You assume I support her positions on Canadian Values
My preference is for more strident screening to keep lunatics out of the country. look at the mess Great Britain has because they based immigration criteria on ideals
Do you want soldiers walking the streets
Polls mean nothing for an election two years away.
Two more years of deficit budgets. The debt levels will be astronomical by then & Granny Wynn will prove to be a huge liability for Justin by then
In addition Justin's idealistic based economic policies (carbon tax) will have started to impact the economy and jobs
While hardly Justin's fault , Trumps protectionism will also have negatively impacted the Canadian economy
The stars will not align for him like they did in 2015
a child-like response from a child-like mind
Grow up and argue facts and logic
Do not hold your breath, Justin will step into it as his handlers will not always be available
another child-like response.
Why is he PM
Very simple he inherited his fathers name. A terrible rational for picking a leader
It's pretty clear that her Canadian values platform was utterly repudiated by the Conservatives, and it's clearly been repudiated by the Liberals and the NDP as well.
I don't know or care whether YOU support it but it's clearly unpopular with Canadians of all political stripes.
