Two comments 
My understanding is no one is paying for sex at a adult body rub or an escort agency. C36 requires payments as I understand it just like the prostitution laws in the U.S.
In Phoenix we have busts and stings all the time and if two people work together, have driver, helper, phone person it is a major criminal enterprise felony with typical laying on of money launder charges and have heard judges giving "Donald Advicements" of up to 40 years in prison if don't take a plea (i.e. Phoenix Goddess Temple indictment of 39 adults).
HOWEVER, LE very careful to get an explicit "fee arrangement". In the Temple case I have police report of a gal in bed naked with an undercover who kept asking for $201 will I at least get a happy ending. She never agreed and therefore, no prostitution charge. Unfortunately she was still indicted by association with a criminal enterprise (Temple), as were others for mere "association" even no evidence of individual prostitution.
The point is if C-36 is interrrepted to require an agreement of sex for money that would not apply to any MPA I have ever been in or escort agency. I wonder about strip clubs which are more explicit on "extra's" Under old law they were not bawdy houses as long as no "penetration" per old Supreme Court case out of Montreal.
Old Dave almost forgot 2nd point Oh Yes,
Bylaws can be challanged such as years ago when Brampton passed a bylaw that said attendant could not be nude. That was overturned in the courts since was a criminal matter not a proper bylaw. Nudity is legal.
However more powerful related to strip clubs is the ABC which is why there is very little contact in B.C. strip clubs. Ontario ABC is not as restrictive. Toronto has a low constact bylaw which is why more conservative Toronto clubs, although could be challaged perhaps. Of course dear Ms Hazel in Sauga was very liberal which is why my favorite nude-reverse on menu in Sauga and very liberal strip clubs.
My understanding is no one is paying for sex at a adult body rub or an escort agency. C36 requires payments as I understand it just like the prostitution laws in the U.S.
In Phoenix we have busts and stings all the time and if two people work together, have driver, helper, phone person it is a major criminal enterprise felony with typical laying on of money launder charges and have heard judges giving "Donald Advicements" of up to 40 years in prison if don't take a plea (i.e. Phoenix Goddess Temple indictment of 39 adults).
HOWEVER, LE very careful to get an explicit "fee arrangement". In the Temple case I have police report of a gal in bed naked with an undercover who kept asking for $201 will I at least get a happy ending. She never agreed and therefore, no prostitution charge. Unfortunately she was still indicted by association with a criminal enterprise (Temple), as were others for mere "association" even no evidence of individual prostitution.
The point is if C-36 is interrrepted to require an agreement of sex for money that would not apply to any MPA I have ever been in or escort agency. I wonder about strip clubs which are more explicit on "extra's" Under old law they were not bawdy houses as long as no "penetration" per old Supreme Court case out of Montreal.
Old Dave almost forgot 2nd point
Oh Yes,Bylaws can be challanged such as years ago when Brampton passed a bylaw that said attendant could not be nude. That was overturned in the courts since was a criminal matter not a proper bylaw. Nudity is legal.
However more powerful related to strip clubs is the ABC which is why there is very little contact in B.C. strip clubs. Ontario ABC is not as restrictive. Toronto has a low constact bylaw which is why more conservative Toronto clubs, although could be challaged perhaps. Of course dear Ms Hazel in Sauga was very liberal which is why my favorite nude-reverse on menu in Sauga and very liberal strip clubs.
