Steeles Royal

World leaders duped manipulates global warming data

Addict2sex

Well-known member
Jan 29, 2017
2,535
1,358
113
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencet...ulated-global-warming-data.html#ixzz4XlWgDL48

BOMBSHELL – NOAA whistleblower says Karl et al. “pausebuster” paper was hyped, broke procedures
By David Rose for The Mail on Sunday
PUBLISHED: 17:57 EST, 4 February 2017 | UPDATED: 20:05 EST, 4 February
They played fast and loose with the figures -NOAA whistleblower

The Mail on Sunday today reveals astonishing evidence that the organisation that is the world’s leading source of climate data rushed to publish a landmark paper that exaggerated global warming and was timed to influence the historic Paris Agreement on climate change.

A high-level whistleblower has told this newspaper that America’s National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) breached its own rules on scientific integrity when it published the sensational but flawed report, aimed at making the maximum possible impact on world leaders including Barack Obama and David Cameron at the UN climate conference in Paris in 2015.

The report claimed that the ‘pause’ or ‘slowdown’ in global warming in the period since 1998 – revealed by UN scientists in 2013 – never existed, and that world temperatures had been rising faster than scientists expected. Launched by NOAA with a public relations fanfare, it was splashed across the world’s media, and cited repeatedly by politicians and policy makers.

But the whistleblower, Dr John Bates, a top NOAA scientist with an impeccable reputation, has shown The Mail on Sunday irrefutable evidence that the paper was based on misleading, ‘unverified’ data.


Exposed: How world leaders were duped into investing billions over manipulated global warming data
The Mail on Sunday can reveal a landmark paper exaggerated global warming
It was rushed through and timed to influence the Paris agreement on climate change
America’s National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration broke its own rules
The report claimed the pause in global warming never existed, but it was based on misleading, ‘unverified’ data


Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencet...ulated-global-warming-data.html#ixzz4Xm2iLI39
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook



Data Science,Climate and satellites Consultant John J Bates, who blew the whistle to the Mail on Sunday

The Mail on Sunday today reveals astonishing evidence that the organisation that is the world’s leading source of climate data rushed to publish a landmark paper that exaggerated global warming and was timed to influence the historic Paris Agreement on climate change.

A high-level whistleblower has told this newspaper that America’s National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) breached its own rules on scientific integrity when it published the sensational but flawed report, aimed at making the maximum possible impact on world leaders including Barack Obama and David Cameron at the UN climate conference in Paris in 2015.

The report claimed that the ‘pause’ or ‘slowdown’ in global warming in the period since 1998 – revealed by UN scientists in 2013 – never existed, and that world temperatures had been rising faster than scientists expected. Launched by NOAA with a public relations fanfare, it was splashed across the world’s media, and cited repeatedly by politicians and policy makers.

But the whistleblower, Dr John Bates, a top NOAA scientist with an impeccable reputation, has shown The Mail on Sunday irrefutable evidence that the paper was based on misleading, ‘unverified’ data.

It was never subjected to NOAA’s rigorous internal evaluation process – which Dr Bates devised.

His vehement objections to the publication of the faulty data were overridden by his NOAA superiors in what he describes as a ‘blatant attempt to intensify the impact’ of what became known as the Pausebuster paper.

His disclosures are likely to stiffen President Trump’s determination to enact his pledges to reverse his predecessor’s ‘green’ policies, and to withdraw from the Paris deal – so triggering an intense political row.

RELATED ARTICLES


Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencet...ulated-global-warming-data.html#ixzz4Xm2X4OHa
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook
 

Addict2sex

Well-known member
Jan 29, 2017
2,535
1,358
113
Dr Bates retired from NOAA at the end of last year after a 40-year career in meteorology and climate science. As recently as 2014, the Obama administration awarded him a special gold medal for his work in setting new, supposedly binding standards ‘to produce and preserve climate data records’.

Yet when it came to the paper timed to influence the Paris conference, Dr Bates said, these standards were flagrantly ignored.

The paper was published in June 2015 by the journal Science. Entitled ‘Possible artifacts of data biases in the recent global surface warming



In the weeks after the Pausebuster paper was published, Dr Bates conducted a one-man investigation into this. His findings were extraordinary. Not only had Mr Karl and his colleagues failed to follow any of the formal procedures required to approve and archive their data, they had used a ‘highly experimental early run’ of a programme that tried to combine two previously separate sets of records.
 

Smallcock

Active member
Jun 5, 2009
13,696
21
38
Climate science has been politicized? Say it ain't so. Haha
 

fuji

Banned
Jan 31, 2005
80,010
8
0
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
is.gd
Climate science has been politicized? Say it ain't so. Haha
Basically alt right ninnies have decided that lying and denying is a substitute for critical thinking. The science is indisputable. But in politics it's possible to elect a liar like Trump and simply declare falsehoods to be true.
 

nottyboi

Well-known member
May 14, 2008
22,954
1,684
113
It always looked fishy to me. But still, if it reduces toxic emissions and improved air quality I can live with it. I do live the warmer winters and the awesome hot, dry summer we had last year.
 

nottyboi

Well-known member
May 14, 2008
22,954
1,684
113
Basically alt right ninnies have decided that lying and denying is a substitute for critical thinking. The science is indisputable. But in politics it's possible to elect a liar like Trump and simply declare falsehoods to be true.
The "science" looks not only disputable, but barely like science at all!!!
 

Addict2sex

Well-known member
Jan 29, 2017
2,535
1,358
113
Climate science has been politicized? Say it ain't so. Haha
I though global warming is real..Why would they lied? Why climate science been politicized? I don't understand????
 

fuji

Banned
Jan 31, 2005
80,010
8
0
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
is.gd
The "science" looks not only disputable, but barely like science at all!!!
It's actually indisputable despite your idiotic claims.

On the other thread about this I linked the Nature study where the warming effect of greenhouse gas was actually measured directly with high precision instruments over a ten year period and found to exactly match the prediction.
 

Addict2sex

Well-known member
Jan 29, 2017
2,535
1,358
113
It's actually indisputable despite your idiotic claims.

On the other thread about this I linked the Nature study where the warming effect of greenhouse gas was actually measured directly with high precision instruments over a ten year period and found to exactly match the prediction.
Ok then explain me why a top NOAA whistle blower say it manuipulated. ANd also . Obama awarded him a special gold medal. It is possible global warming became some sort of gravy train? So people or company can profit out of it or maybe some sort of new type of taxes for government??

Dr Bates retired from NOAA at the end of last year after a 40-year career in meteorology and climate science. As recently as 2014, the Obama administration awarded him a special gold medal for his work in setting new, supposedly binding standards ‘to produce and preserve climate data records’.

But the whistleblower, Dr John Bates, a top NOAA scientist with an impeccable reputation, has shown The Mail on Sunday irrefutable evidence that the paper was based on misleading, ‘unverified’ data.
 

fuji

Banned
Jan 31, 2005
80,010
8
0
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
is.gd
Ok then explain me why a top NOAA whistle blower say it manuipulated. ANd also . Obama awarded him a special gold medal. It is possible global warming became some sort of gravy train? So people or company can profit out of it or maybe some sort of new type of taxes for government??

Dr Bates retired from NOAA at the end of last year after a 40-year career in meteorology and climate science. As recently as 2014, the Obama administration awarded him a special gold medal for his work in setting new, supposedly binding standards ‘to produce and preserve climate data records’.

But the whistleblower, Dr John Bates, a top NOAA scientist with an impeccable reputation, has shown The Mail on Sunday irrefutable evidence that the paper was based on misleading, ‘unverified’ data.
I'm not going to argue stupid conspiracy theories with you. The science is indisputable. Go look up the article I mentioned in Nature.

Nature is authoritative.

YouTube is not. The Mail is not. Alt right blogs are not.
 

Addict2sex

Well-known member
Jan 29, 2017
2,535
1,358
113
I'm not going to argue stupid conspiracy theories with you. The science is indisputable. Go look up the article I mentioned in Nature.

Nature is authoritative.

YouTube is not. The Mail is not. Alt right blogs are not.
Dr Bate is from NOAA and he is not alt right . HE is a whistle blower..and employed by NOAA!! Some thing is fishy here!!! Plus why did Obama awarded him a gold medal??? When a President of USA awarded you a gold medal it a big thing.. don't you think? It like Trudeau awarded you a Order of Canada. It a recognition of your accomplishment. Don't they vetted this people out before they give them gold medal!
 

fuji

Banned
Jan 31, 2005
80,010
8
0
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
is.gd
Dr Bate is from NOAA and he is not alt right . HE is a whistle blower..and employed by NOAA!! Some thing is fishy here!!! Plus why did Obama awarded him a gold medal??? When a President of USA awarded you a gold medal it a big thing.. don't you think? It like Trudeau awarded you a Order of Canada. It a recognition of your accomplishment. Don't they vetted this people out before they give them gold medal!
Again I don't give a shit about your conspiracy. Definitive proof of global warming was published in Nature.

Here's a synopsis in case you don't have a subscription:

http://newscenter.lbl.gov/2015/02/25/co2-greenhouse-effect-increase/
 

FAST

Banned
Mar 12, 2004
10,069
1
0
I'm not going to argue stupid conspiracy theories with you. The science is indisputable. Go look up the article I mentioned in Nature.

Nature is authoritative.

YouTube is not. The Mail is not. Alt right blogs are not.
Typical response from some one who got hit in the head by a "hockey stick".

The OP confirms that denying among the sky is falling crowd is still active.

One last thing,...YouTube is does NOT publish anything,...google it,...if you don't understand the difference.

FAST
 

FAST

Banned
Mar 12, 2004
10,069
1
0
Again I don't give a shit about your conspiracy. Definitive proof of global warming was published in Nature.

Here's a synopsis in case you don't have a subscription:

http://newscenter.lbl.gov/2015/02/25/co2-greenhouse-effect-increase/
From your link Fuji,...
"Scientists have observed an increase in carbon dioxide’s greenhouse effect at the Earth’s surface for the first time",...published in 2015.

So all of the grand proclamations in all of the preceding years was just some ones best guess.

In other words,...we shouldn't have trusted the pre 2015, but NOW,...they are definitive,...maybe we should wait another couple of years.

And maybe by that time Fat Al will go swimming in the North Pole.

FAST
 

fuji

Banned
Jan 31, 2005
80,010
8
0
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
is.gd
And we all no science has never been used to further an agenda, manipulating and interpreting data as they see to fit their needs.
You can yap all you like about agendas, that is a link to hard empirical proof of global warming.
 

fuji

Banned
Jan 31, 2005
80,010
8
0
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
is.gd
From your link Fuji,...
"Scientists have observed an increase in carbon dioxide’s greenhouse effect at the Earth’s surface for the first time",...published in 2015.

So all of the grand proclamations in all of the preceding years was just some ones best guess.

In other words,...we shouldn't have trusted the pre 2015, but NOW,...they are definitive,...maybe we should wait another couple of years.

And maybe by that time Fat Al will go swimming in the North Pole.

FAST
What it says is that the prediction was confirmed, proving the model correct, which is a surprise only to kooks who deny global warming.
 

nottyboi

Well-known member
May 14, 2008
22,954
1,684
113
It's actually indisputable despite your idiotic claims.
I linked the Nature study where the warming effect of greenhouse gas was actually measured directly with high precision instruments over a ten year period and found to exactly match the prediction.
That alone is enough to confirm its probably HORSESHIT!!!
 

FAST

Banned
Mar 12, 2004
10,069
1
0
What it says is that the prediction was confirmed, proving the model correct, which is a surprise only to kooks who deny global warming.
So you are telling me that the graph on your link,... essentially confirms that the globe's temp. virtually moves in lock step with the co2 level in the atmosphere.

I guess these "scientists" were never taught anything about inertia,...???

And per your science,... spring happens at the same time for the whole globe,...???

These self proclaimed "experts" can't help but make themselves look like untouchables.

FAST
 
Ashley Madison
Toronto Escorts