Perhaps common knowledge but a link?Perhaps when the Police were called after a "volatile incident" when he allegedly threatened to kill her if she didn't get an abortion, some 10 years ago? .
Perhaps common knowledge but a link?Perhaps when the Police were called after a "volatile incident" when he allegedly threatened to kill her if she didn't get an abortion, some 10 years ago? .
Ismailis are so peaceful/non-violet that some (many?) Muslims don't consider them to be true Muslims.Mohammed Shamji is probably an Ismaili name. Ismaili are Muslims who believe in a living imam/prophet - the Aga khan
I'm not totally disagreeing with you. But, the police made a very quick arrest and he is charged (I believe) with 1st degree murder. They must have a smoking gun if they think it was premeditated. But then again, I'm not a lawyer, so who knows.am i the only one who still remembers that we have a principle called 'innocent until proven guilty' for a reason? you people are all jumping to conclusions with absolutely none of the facts. police always look at the husband first when a woman gets murdered - it produces a certain kind of tunnelvision. let's not indict this guy like the mob swarm you're all being before we know anything. "he has the eyes of a murderer" - lmao do you know how dumb you sound.
There was a confusing news blackout at the start of the investigation.Dawn does have a point that he is innocent till proven guilty but i feel like there is strong evidence the cops have not released.
It was her parents who reported her missing.I wonder if he reported his wife missing.
as with anything being a super star in one field doesnt mean you are an expert in another field.For a neurosurgeon he was pretty dumb by just dumping the body there and trying to get away if that was the case, just saying.
It is a lot more complicated than just religion. Islamic culture and values may have played a more important role than religion.Was the guy's religious upbringing ever mentioned? I personally know
at least one non-religious guy named Mohammed. Surely non-religious
men are no less capable of wife-killing.
The OP posted a link. I guess you didn't watch the video...Perhaps common knowledge but a link?
Some (many?most?) Muslims would say that their religion, culture and values are all interwoven. On the other hand, how many Christians are secular and do not take the Bible literally and do not pray 50 times a day or even attend church on most Sundays.It is a lot more complicated than just religion. Islamic culture and values
Trust that you'd be here with your insight to the 'other'.Ismailis are so peaceful/non-violet that some (many?) Muslims don't consider them to be true Muslims.
[h=1]Are Ismaili muslims?[/h]http://www.shiachat.com/forum/topic/234966041-are-ismaili-muslims/Trust that you'd be here with your insight to the 'other'.
That is nonsense, GPs have to cover a lot of office family medicine is around 241K general surgeons close to 400K so a specialist neurosurgeon would make a shitload more, maybe 5-600Kthats not true either. There are Neurosurgeon's on the lower end of the spectrum and GP's on the higher end of the spectrum.
Where on earth are you people getting your information?
"Innocent until proven guilty" is a legal concept which applies in a court of law. It doesn't apply on internet boards, bar room discussions, dinner table talk, etc. And no one here has the power or authority to indict the accused.am i the only one who still remembers that we have a principle called 'innocent until proven guilty' for a reason? you people are all jumping to conclusions with absolutely none of the facts. police always look at the husband first when a woman gets murdered - it produces a certain kind of tunnelvision. let's not indict this guy like the mob swarm you're all being before we know anything. "he has the eyes of a murderer" - lmao do you know how dumb you sound.
"Innocent until proven guilty" is a legal concept which applies in a court of law.
It doesn't apply on internet boards, bar room discussions, dinner table talk, etc.
And no one here has the power or authority to indict the accused.
My experience has been, that the more pronounced the facade, a good chance the opposite is true.Absolutely tragic.
But both the above and Jackjackjohnson's statements can be true, it is amazing/shocking how people will attempt to maintain a facade of normalcy even as their personal lives are falling apart.
He did not even report his own wife missing apparently. So that is pretty much a slam dunk!!!"Innocent until proven guilty" is a legal concept which applies in a court of law. It doesn't apply on internet boards, bar room discussions, dinner table talk, etc. And no one here has the power or authority to indict the accused.
Yeah, I'm sure he has a squeaky clean alibi.no, that is called circumstantial evidence. there's nothing 'slam dunk' about that at all, since there's many, many other inferences to be drawn from that fact alone (if it was true). how long was she missing for? did they have a fight that would explain why he didn't really care for her disappearance? did she say she was going somewhere and therefore he wasn't worried?
I don't know. This forum just makes me sad for humanity.That is nonsense, GPs have to cover a lot of office family medicine is around 241K general surgeons close to 400K so a specialist neurosurgeon would make a shitload more, maybe 5-600K