Left wing? Stupid comment.So you pull out 3 left-wing media as your sources, and thats your evidence??
Actually it's the voters who are now saying they are choosing republican on the machines and its selecting a democrat, so now the voters are having to double and triple check their votes, which of course, they are willing to do.
Yet no similar reports in the early polls for this election.
Did you watch the whole video?? The report was for a single machine in Chicago in 2014. A calibration problem for the machine was identified and corrected. The voter immediately saw the error and did verify his vote was eventually properly counted. Nothing was hidden from him. No FRAUD occurred. No other similar reports for other machines or other districts. This appears to be a one-off incident.
I haven't watched every interview she's done, but I did watch the MSNBC interview. You pretty much confirmed my take. She did not agree with the much higher 7-9 percent national figure thrown around on that network. 4-5 isn't time to throw in the towel, given the margin of error and turnout issues.
Statistically true. She has spent a lot more money on a lot of things this election, but it doesn't appear that her excessive spending has been that effective (imagine that - a politician whose spending is innefficent!) That's why Trump is still in the game. It's going to take a hell of a ground game to get those Bernie supporters to the booth and all those unregistered voters signed up. No problems of that kind on the Trump side. Clinton can't even get her supporters to come to a rally. Kaine can't even draw family members to one of his rallies.
We sure do know that, from WikiLeaks #1. Read back on my posts, I've never said otherwise. I've simply said that some things, like the media organizing favourable poll reporting for Hillary, wouldn't necessarily take active co-ordination.
It's a little rich for you to use a term like "bull" and then counter with such a wild speculative theory. A simpler explanation is more credible. Trump would praise the press if they were on his side. He's criticizing them because they aren't. In any case, they clearly deserve the criticism they are getting, and then some.
Nope. Where do you think I got those numbers from? They are exactly correct from the only speech he gave on the day he announced he would be suing the accusers. On that day, almost 100% of the coverage on CNN and NBC concerned the lawsuit, and hardly any coverage was given to his 100 day plan.
The first part of my response in regards to the voters double and triple checking IS happening now throughout a few States. As to the video, it's 2 years old, i posted it as an example that it does happen and voters are saying as much in this election.
Again - from the video - it was a single machine. The voter saw the error on the screen - no fraud intended or occurred. It was identified as a calibration problem and fixed. The calibration error could have just as easily gone the other way - curious did you check and verify if the state was red or blue before posting? You do realize different states use many different voting tools?
Do you have an hour? Do you know how many states have Soro's smartmatic machines? Here, I will help you out, 16 States have his machines.
Supercharge, as usual, you are 100% wrong. The correct answer is zero.
You should take a look at Wikileaks then, Soro's ties are deeper than you might think. Basically, by removing the machines they are confirming the machines are rigged or they are flawed, bigly.
It doesn't matter who you were talking to, you were posting nonsense. One broken machine two years ago is insignificant.
This is an open bulletin board. Everyone has the right to comment. Shall I start pointing out every time you respond to someone who wasn't talking to you?
Not that it's relevant, but feel free to provide a link. You had better check your facts though, because you know I will and you are looking pretty damn foolish these days.
Fuji I don't know if you are living on earth with the rest of us or not, but you are way behind my friend. Look alive, many voters are saying they're votes are not counting the way it should be and are even getting video evidence.
I learned about this Soro's deal through Wikileaks. So the video from 2 years ago was Trumps fault too? You guys just don't want to accept the facts. It's happens before, and it's happening now, look at the video evidence. Your google friendly, go nuts.
Like the evidence you already provided? Turned out to be all lies originated by the Trump team itself.
Sorry, but the only people talking about this are die hard Trump supporters who refuse to admit that Trump is just not that popular.
What facts? What proof? What video evidence? Do you really think if you repeat the same garbage over and over it will suddenly be viewed as truth? Ohhh, I guess Trump tries this all the time.
