The new official climate change thread
- Thread starter K Douglas
- Start date
Come over here and say that!
And tell me more about your theory that the UN is trying to take over the developed world by faking climate change, I could use a few more good laughs.
Now you are just trying to bluster your way past the Nature study which indeed confirmed the results of many other studies. Nature is the best there is. Bluster isn't a counter argument.Nice back track fuji
You will note that the 2015 El Nino was not as strong as the 1998 which did indeed create a global step in temperature.
You keep quoting this study in Nature. Was that study reconfirmed by other scientific observations? You know what other study appeared in that publication right - the infamous fraudulent hockey stick. Which is why it's reputation has taken quite a hit over the years. Bottom line is I take studies published from that magazine with a serious grain of salt.
You have no explanation for why your (Conway's) prediction of cooling was so disastrously wrong.
You are left sputtering in the face of the indisputable evidence that the climate is consistently warming.
You're done .
Peabody has been tied to a Canadian denier group, the so-called 'friends of science'.
http://www.nationalobserver.com/201...nt-owed-money-canadian-climate-change-deniers
The Peabody/Exxon cases are proving to be very interesting.
http://www.nationalobserver.com/201...nt-owed-money-canadian-climate-change-deniers
The Peabody/Exxon cases are proving to be very interesting.
God damn you are arrogant
Do not tell me how I view a subject
Again if any view does not match yours it is foolish ????
Just keep on proving you are not objective and have an agenda
5 or 10 minutes is hardly the correct amount of time to make a determination on such an important question
Apparently they are too tough to make you think about the timelines
Really
Man was not pollution the world then, I wonder what occurred 4 million years ago ?
again for the tenth time. I do not refuse to read research
I just do not respect or trust you so I have no interest in spending my time reading what you promote
Why can you not get that ???
are you incapable of grasping the point ?
I am not you moron
I am just pointing out a zealot and snake oil salesman
You do not have to mention them by name. You are resonating what these tobacco scientists are preaching.
So do you have any respect for the NASA scientists who clearly have stated that there is a definite warming trend?
Interesting post, larue.
Ok, not so much, nothing there except insults, really.
The most entertaining has to be your repeated accusations of 'zealot' and 'snake oil salesman'.
After all, the arguments and research I post come from the most respected scientists and agencies around.
So far the only thing you've come up with is a youtube video by the dead dr carter.
And even with that you are unable to articulate what your claims are:
1) what questions did dr carter ask that you think are unanswered?
2) what serious doubts did he raise?
3) why do you think those questions are unanswered?
4) what research did you do to confirm they are unanswered?
And while its very entertaining that you seem to think that the reputation of the IPCC, NASA et al ride on your views of my posts here, it really is a particularly lame answer for not doing basic research.
I can't imagine what kind of investor you'd be if that's an example of how much research you do before you make up your mind (and yes, you've made up your mind not to look at the legit research, whatever the excuse and blaming me is particularly lame).
I do NOT,..."resonate with what these tobacco scientists are preaching",...but what I do,... is ask questions that the alarmists backing lying cowards will not answer.
"A warming trend",...now THAT is a significant statement,...you mean like in 1910,...must have been all those suv's.
FAST
Yawn
I do not have to prove anything to you
Once a groggy fool, always a groggy fool
Right here, FAST.
By the way, find any other conspiracy kooks who back your UN conspiracy yet?
OH,...I thought for once your were being a man,...my mistake.
I have reminded you of your new title enough times,...even you can remember,...its the title you have well earned.
FAST
That really says a lot about you that you've been so embarrassed on this thread that now you just want to resort to violence.
Over a climate change thread on an escort review board.
All because you've been asked about your theory that the UN is trying to take over the developed world through a nefarious climate change plot.
Enjoy your Friday night.
Oh so you were around in 1910, and NASA did not exist then. So you think that they do not know what they are talking about. Are you an Ecological Scientist?
Its true that most of the basics you still haven't figured out were taught in early grades.
But hey, just because research that was funded by the fossil fuel industry came to exactly the same conclusions as that of government funded research shouldn't stop you from looking for obscure youtube videos by dead scientists for your research.
In fact, there's a great site that compares results to funding sources, sortable by fields of study.
https://www.climatologyfundingdatabase.com
Confirms you are either really lacking in intelligence or completely unread.
There are numerous graphs available, for those who can actually read graphs,... showing the globes temp starting a warming trend in 1910,...that continues for 40 years gaining .75C ,...again it must have been all those suv's.
Including one from,...wait for it,...NASA that actually goes back to 1880,...and NO,...NASA did not exist then,...in case you didn't know.
You should stop reading the Lying Coward's posts,...they are effecting you reasoning capabilities.
FAST
You know that the magazine that you are getting your information is dated 1910. Much has happened since then. NASA and NOAA have categorically stated that 2015 was 0.23 Celsius warmer than the previous warmest year. I.e. 2014. Now they state that 2016 is expected to be even warmer. Okay?? ...??...??
There you go ruining what might be a perfectly good research by endorsing it
You are the worst enemy of the cause
