Trump Manager Charged, then not charged

Smallcock

Active member
Jun 5, 2009
13,696
21
38

Butler1000

Well-known member
Oct 31, 2011
31,125
5,217
113
Wall Street beholden neo-cons are good for America.
Except she is professing to be a progressive. Like I said. A liar.

She almost lost to Bernie. I'm actually looking forward to Trump going after her.

I don't think she will be able to handle him.
 

Butler1000

Well-known member
Oct 31, 2011
31,125
5,217
113
Fact: Sanders spent more than Clinton

Fact: Sanders had a MUCH larger campaign team

Next time find out the facts before posting.
Add in the Super PACs and she is ahead. Add the money spent by the Clinton Foundation and she is ahead.

And the fact that Bernie can attract more volunteers shouldn't be considered a bad thing. Would that Clinton had the charisma her husband does. At least I suppose she inherited the machine he built.
 

slowandeasy

Why am I here?
May 4, 2003
7,231
0
36
GTA
Add in the Super PACs and she is ahead. Add the money spent by the Clinton Foundation and she is ahead.

And the fact that Bernie can attract more volunteers shouldn't be considered a bad thing. Would that Clinton had the charisma her husband does. At least I suppose she inherited the machine he built.
I prefer that my leader is not all charisma no substance. Unfortunately, all substance and no charisma will not get you elected the leader of the free world. Before any of you lunatics :) go off on me, I don't think
that Hilary is all substance.
 

AK-47

Armed to the tits
Mar 6, 2009
6,697
1
0
In the 6
If you need any further proof the Cruz family are a bunch of religious nutcases, read this:

http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2016/02/rafael-cruz-ted-cruz-campaign-god-sign

My Son Ran for President After God Sent His Wife a Sign

Ted Cruz decided to run for president after God spoke to his wife, Heidi.

That's how Rafael Cruz, Ted's father and a born-again pastor, described his son's decision-making process. Speaking on a syndicated radio show at the end of last year, the elder Cruz recounted that during a Sunday prayer session at a Texas church, Ted Cruz and his family sought God's guidance as to whether the senator should enter the presidential race, and after two hours of praying, God sent a message to Heidi that essentially said: Go for it.

My son Ted and his family spent six months in prayer seeking God's will for this decision. But the day the final green light came on, the whole family was together. It was a Sunday. We were all at his church, First Baptist Church in Houston, including his senior staff. After the church service, we all gathered at the pastor's office. We were on our knees for two hours seeking God's will. At the end of that time, a word came through his wife, Heidi. And the word came, just saying, "Seek God's face, not God's hand." And I'll tell you, it was as if there was a cloud of the holy spirit filling that place. Some of us were weeping, and Ted just looked up and said, "Lord, here am I, use me. I surrender to you, whatever you want." And he felt that was a green light to move forward
 

fuji

Banned
Jan 31, 2005
80,010
8
0
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
is.gd
Add in the Super PACs and she is ahead. Add the money spent by the Clinton Foundation and she is ahead.

And the fact that Bernie can attract more volunteers shouldn't be considered a bad thing. Would that Clinton had the charisma her husband does. At least I suppose she inherited the machine he built.
Fact: Sanders had a much larger paid campaign team then Clinton did. (He recently laid a lot of them off, up until that point his hired staff was much larger than hers)
 

Smallcock

Active member
Jun 5, 2009
13,696
21
38
Specifically, Romney's record....
Specifically Romney, Reagan, Bush, McCain, and ALL others except Bush's victory in 2000. He will beat that, too, and demolish the GOP record.
 

Butler1000

Well-known member
Oct 31, 2011
31,125
5,217
113
Fact: Sanders had a much larger paid campaign team then Clinton did. (He recently laid a lot of them off, up until that point his hired staff was much larger than hers)
Bullshit. Link to the paid employees please. Include the Clinton Foundation and her Super Pac.

You're just lyin' now. Getting into Cruz territory with that wopper.
 

Smallcock

Active member
Jun 5, 2009
13,696
21
38
Hillary is such a lackluster conventional hack. No substance, poor track record. All that comes out of her mouth is phony cliched rhetoric. She's a "paper politicians" - looks good on paper only. She has worn many high status job titles. That's all. She achieved nothing in any of her roles.

She was nearly dethroned by Bernie - a man who nobody had even heard of 8 months ago.

If Hillary is elected, the status quo stays exactly the same. If Trump is elected, the USA will be led in a way not seen for at least 50 years. A significant, deliberate, positive shift in domestic and foreign policy that can NEVER be achieved otherwise. Naive liberals thought Obama was going to be some sort of savior. Before he was elected I said that he will be no different than other presidents in recent history except that he has a deeper tan. DIFFERENT thinking doesn't come from people who come out from the same corrupt system, beholden to the same corrupt interest groups.

Trump is the most amazing political story in modern history. It's going to be one helluva race to watch, if not for entertainment value alone.
 

AK-47

Armed to the tits
Mar 6, 2009
6,697
1
0
In the 6
Bullshit. Link to the paid employees please
Watch, he wont respond. When really backed into a corner with his bullshit fuji goes radio silent
 

Smallcock

Active member
Jun 5, 2009
13,696
21
38
That link says that Sanders spent more than Clinton in the last 3 months. Campaigns didn't start in the last 3 months.

I haven't looked at any of the stats, because they're irrelevant. The media establishment and political establishment backed Clinton from the start.

You've been a shill for Crooked Hillary since the race began. I'm very delighted that she's the Democratic nominee.
 

eznutz

Active member
Jul 17, 2007
2,394
0
36
Hillary's campaign has raised $256,406,847 ($76,248,476 from 7 Supers PAC's & $180,158,371 from individual donors) while spending $182,933,349
Bernie's campaign has raised $182,786,608 ($604,465 from 5 SuperPAC's & $182,182,143 from donors) while spending $165,344,592
http://www.opensecrets.org/pres16/

We can all see who scored big time with the establishment crowd, and still has money to Bern.
 

jcpro

Well-known member
Jan 31, 2014
24,670
6,839
113
Personally, I enjoy Hilary's sense of humor. The other day she was criticizing Trump for lack of connection to the common people. Of course the only common people she knows are the celebrities' butlers, but who's gonna notice? Or even report it. Not even the Comedy Network, too bad- this material is gold.
 

FAST

Banned
Mar 12, 2004
10,069
1
0
Personally, I enjoy Hilary's sense of humor. The other day she was criticizing Trump for lack of connection to the common people. Of course the only common people she knows are the celebrities' butlers, but who's gonna notice? Or even report it. Not even the Comedy Network, too bad- this material is gold.
SNL does a pretty good job on her,...should be fun this sat.

FAST
 

Butler1000

Well-known member
Oct 31, 2011
31,125
5,217
113

fuji

Banned
Jan 31, 2005
80,010
8
0
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
is.gd
Didn't include the Clinton Foundation and Superpac cash. Also the last four years of private snoozing and payoffs to superdelegates.

That apparently was only for the last 3 months according to the article. Nice try to pass this off as the complete campaign.

Heartfelt apology denied.
Despite your lack of sincerity, this point carries: Clinton won more votes than Sanders despite the fact that he outspent her and had a larger ground game.
 

Smallcock

Active member
Jun 5, 2009
13,696
21
38
Despite your lack of sincerity, this point carries: Clinton won more votes than Sanders despite the fact that he outspent her and had a larger ground game.
The Clinton campaign outspent Sanders by $18 million.

What part of the stats posted above do you not understand?

Hillary's campaign has raised $256,406,847 ($76,248,476 from 7 Supers PAC's & $180,158,371 from individual donors) while spending $182,933,349
Bernie's campaign has raised $182,786,608 ($604,465 from 5 SuperPAC's & $182,182,143 from donors) while spending $165,344,592
http://www.opensecrets.org/pres16/

She spent more than him, raised hundreds of times more money from special interests, had Super Delegates in the bag out of the gate, has the historic value of being potentially the first female President, and has been the media's darling from the start. Yet STILL lost significant contests. Bernie was extremely competitive as an unknown running against a household name.

The way the media treated Bernie was disgraceful.
 
Last edited:
Toronto Escorts