Trump Manager Charged, then not charged

[Malibook]

They never claimed that the bruises were from the alleged incident.
They did say that the photos from the night of the alleged incident showed no bruises and they were not even remotely similar to the photos that Fields provided a few days later.
It could have been poor quality photos, delayed reaction bruising, or some other possible explanation.
Nothing definitive whatsoever.

The assistant DA had asked the lead detective to provide photos that were taken closer to the time of the incident.
The ones that showed no bruises.
She certainly was not prepared to simply accept the other photos taken days later as definitive conclusive proof.

Fuji repeatedly claimed that the DA carefully reviewed the evidence and decided to press charges, which is complete total bullshit.

Fuji repeatedly claimed that Fields was beaten up and violently assaulted then he says they didn`t want to waste court time on this minor incident.

 

[AK-47]

They didnt validate anything, they merely presented alleged evidence.
Its up to the courts and a jury to "validate" whether or not the evidence is true or not

This is correct

After carefully reviewing the evidence the DA wholly concurred with Field's version of events, while concluding that Lewandowski lied

This is incorrect

 

[Smallcock]

This sideshow is all water under the bridge now. The likes of fuji can beat a dead horse but the news cycle has moved on. The only fitting conclusion is for Fields to get sacked.

In relevant news Trump trounced his opponents in New York! It'll be the same story in Jersey and other upcoming contests.

 

[AK-47]

In relevant news Trump trounced his opponents in New York! It'll be the same story in Jersey and other upcoming contests

Trump has 756 delegates now after NY win. 1,237 are needed for nomination and there are 826 still available.
This means Trump only has to win 50% of remaining delegates and he gets the nom.

Its pretty much in the bag. Cant wait for the Hillary/Trump debates.
Thats gonna be epic

 

[fuji]

They never claimed that the bruises were from the alleged incident.
They did say that the photos from the night of the alleged incident showed no bruises and they were not even remotely similar to the photos that Fields provided a few days later.

They confirmed the bruises explicitly and discussed this in the video above.

The assistant DA had asked the lead detective to provide photos that were taken closer to the time of the incident.

And in the video the DA talks about how that is expected since in their experience bruises on victims do normally darken a day later. The DA actually discussed this.

Fuji repeatedly claimed that Fields was beaten up and violently assaulted then he says they didn`t want to waste court time on this minor incident.

That's true.

 

[fuji]

Just post the timestamp please. I have a feeling it doesnt exist, or the DA didnt say it in the exact words you claim he said it.

And this was your exact quote:

So you are backing down, not willing to stand behind your claims, too chicken to agree to concede the point if I spend my time to get you the timestamps.

I threw down the glove and you ran.

 

[fuji]

Trump has 756 delegates now after NY win. 1,237 are needed for nomination and there are 826 still available.
This means Trump only has to win 50% of remaining delegates and he gets the nom.

Its pretty much in the bag. Cant wait for the Hillary/Trump debates.
Thats gonna be epic

Actually he needs 58% but then math isn't your strong point.

 

[Malibook]

They confirmed the bruises explicitly and discussed this in the video above.

And in the video the DA talks about how that is expected since in their experience bruises on victims do normally darken a day later. The DA actually discussed this.

They confirmed that there were pictures of bruises.
They did not claim that they came from the alleged incident.

The assistant DA said that the bruises "could be" the way people bruise, not that it is expected.
She certainly did not make a definitive connection as you so ludicrously profess.

Something is clouding your thought process, or is this normal for you?

 

[AK-47]

Actually he needs 58% but then math isn't your strong point

Thats okay fuji, I rather make the occassional math error as opposed to being completely out of touch with reality and seeing viscious assaults that simply arent there

 

[fuji]

They confirmed that there were pictures of bruises.
They did not claim that they came from the alleged incident.

The assistant DA said that the bruises "could be" the way people bruise, not that it is expected.
She certainly did not make a definitive connection as you so ludicrously profess.

Something is clouding your thought process, or is this normal for you?

The DA took the pictures showing the bruises. They confirmed that she was grabbed. That validated her story. The DA concluded there weren't grounds for a charge because there was a possible justification for the use of violence--but they clearly accepted that the violence occurred.

That makes Lewandowski a filthy liar for claiming that he never touched her, when it's been shown that he did.

 

[Malibook]

The DA took the pictures showing the bruises.

At least you are consistent.

Go to 11:50 of the video.
The Assistant DA is explicitly asked, when she saw the photos of the bruises, did it appear to her that they were from the incident in question.
First of all, she says that the photos were received, not taken.
And then she goes on to say they were a couple of days old and she asked the lead detective for photos taken closer to the time of the alleged incident.
She doesn`t even remotely come close to saying yes, except in your mind.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eMYkuz3FzSI

 

[Malibook]

So you are backing down, not willing to stand behind your claims, too chicken to agree to concede the point if I spend my time to get you the timestamps.

I threw down the glove and you ran.

Fuji wins again!!:crazy:

 

[fuji]

At least you are consistent.

Go to 11:50 of the video.
The Assistant DA is explicitly asked, when she saw the photos of the bruises, did it appear to her that they were from the incident in question.
First of all, she says that the photos were received, not taken.
And then she goes on to say they were a couple of days old and she asked the lead detective for photos taken closer to the time of the alleged incident.
She doesn`t even remotely come close to saying yes, except in your mind.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eMYkuz3FzSI

The pictures taken a few days after, the ones showing bruises, were taken by the police when the complaint was filed. The earlier picture from the day of the assault were taken by Fields with her iPhone. The DA received the pictures showing bruises from the Jupiter police.

The DA has corroborated Field's account, confirming that she was grabbed and confirming that she had bruises.

The DA also repudiated Lewandowski's account, proving him to be a filthy liar.

 

[fuji]

Fuji wins again!!:crazy:

Get used to it.

 

[Malibook]

The pictures taken a few days after, the ones showing bruises, were taken by the police when the complaint was filed. The earlier picture from the day of the assault were taken by Fields with her iPhone. The DA received the pictures showing bruises from the Jupiter police.

At 12:30 of the video, it sounds like she is saying the photos were received from the police who got them from Fields.
In any case, they were not taken by the DA, as you claimed.

Neither the DA or the assistant DA claimed that the bruises were from the incident in question, as you claimed.

The DA, after carefully reviewing the evidence, did not press charges, as you claimed.

The DA stated that Fields initially complied with the secret service but then she returned to where she was not supposed to be and she touched Trump which she was not supposed to do.
Fields claimed that she was just standing where she was supposed to be and Trump approached her and she asked him a question.
Fields claimed that Trump was welcoming her question and the DA states that Trump pulls away from her.
The DA disputed some relevant facts from Fields statement, not as you claimed.

Like I said, at least you are consistent.

 

[slowandeasy]

The likes of fuji can beat a dead horse but the news cycle has moved on.

But you know that Fuji lives for this.. Someone should put that poor horse out of its misery Fuji has been beating it for years.

 

[The LoLRus]

So you are backing down, not willing to stand behind your claims, too chicken to agree to concede the point if I spend my time to get you the timestamps.

I threw down the glove and you ran

Right, thats what I thought. You wont post the exact timestamp because it doesnt exist

The DA took the pictures showing the bruises. They confirmed that she was grabbed. That validated her story. The DA concluded there weren't grounds for a charge because there was a possible justification for the use of violence--but they clearly accepted that the violence occurred.

That makes Lewandowski a filthy liar for claiming that he never touched her, when it's been shown that he did

No, it doesnt. Lewandowski probably has to move hundreds of people out of the way every day, how could he possibly remember every person he touched. What Lewandowski meant was he never touched her in the context that she said he did, which was practically throwing her to the ground (which never happened)

 

[fuji]

Sorry but he didn't say he moves hundreds of people out of the way, he insisted it never happened. He got caught lying. He is a liar.

There's no way around this, he made a definitive and clear statement that was a blatant lie. Her statement on the other hand has been confirmed by the evidence.

 

[Smallcock]

Trump way ahead of the competition in Delaware polls.

 

[Smallcock]

Trump leads in the polls for all the states voting next Tuesday.