Holmolka Alive And Well Living in Quebec

pervertinoh

New member
Jun 7, 2015
170
1
0
I keep making myself look like a fool ? Really? I thought I was talking sense . I guess you learn something new every day . Thanks for enlightening me .
 

destillat

Well-known member
Aug 29, 2001
2,796
42
48
mississauga
I keep making myself look like a fool ? Really? I thought I was talking sense . I guess you learn something new every day . Thanks for enlightening me .
I'd bill you for the time, but it seems like you really needed the reality check, so let's just say this one is on the house.
 

pervertinoh

New member
Jun 7, 2015
170
1
0
Bill me for the time . Hahaha . Sounding like a lawyer . If you want to resolve a simple matter in 5-10 years and go broke at the same time hand your problem over to a lawyer . Gotta love the legal system
 

SchlongConery

License to Shill
Jan 28, 2013
12,868
6,338
113
Bill me for the time . Hahaha . Sounding like a lawyer . If you want to resolve a simple matter in 5-10 years and go broke at the same time hand your problem over to a lawyer . Gotta love the legal system

A legal system that allows you to pay for sex. That allows you to walk down almost every street in Canada at any time of the day without being in danger.

A legal system that is based on considered wisdom, not emotion.
 

pervertinoh

New member
Jun 7, 2015
170
1
0
Yeah go through litigation and get things resolved before you or the other party dies then you can give praise where praise is due .
 

pervertinoh

New member
Jun 7, 2015
170
1
0
Having money in my pocket and a pecker that goes up allows me to pay for sex not the legal system . Walking down the street without being in danger I would chalk up to more good people than bad and choosing the right street to walk down
 

destillat

Well-known member
Aug 29, 2001
2,796
42
48
mississauga
Yeah go through litigation and get things resolved before you or the other party dies then you can give praise where praise is due .
Every single litigation I have been through in my life (full disclosure, I am not a lawyer, just a simple citizen), has been done and done in under 3 years, more commonly under 2 years.

You still don't know what you are talking about, you just changed topics.
 

SchlongConery

License to Shill
Jan 28, 2013
12,868
6,338
113
Yeah go through litigation and get things resolved before you or the other party dies then you can give praise where praise is due .

So you would rather not have the right to sue someone or some company or the government when you have been ripped off?

Or just go ahead and hang them on your say-so?

I realize that thinking a little deeper than just following your emotions is not as much fun as just whining but if you do think things through you might see that our legal system is not so bad.
 

pervertinoh

New member
Jun 7, 2015
170
1
0
Yes I'd like to have the right to a speedy resolution to a matter at hand and that is a rarity in our system . Thank God most other sectors don't get things done at such a snails pace
 

SchlongConery

License to Shill
Jan 28, 2013
12,868
6,338
113
Yes I'd like to have the right to a speedy resolution to a matter at hand and that is a rarity in our system . Thank God most other sectors don't get things done at such a snails pace
Actually, in all but more complicated and contentious matters, it often takes maybe two to three years. For matters under $100k, there is a "simplified procedure" that cuts down on a lot of the bs too.

In the criminal justice system, the accused has a constitutional right to a "speedy" trial.

I know it doesn't jive with your emotions but those are the facts.
 

pervertinoh

New member
Jun 7, 2015
170
1
0
I'm proud of being emotional. I never met someone who wasn't emotional that really touched me . That goes with ladies in the industry too. If I wanna deal with robots I'll become a Vulcan or glingon. Fuck that shit ! 2 to 3 years is considered to be in a timely fashion . Lol what a joke. 100 storey buildings get built faster
 

SchlongConery

License to Shill
Jan 28, 2013
12,868
6,338
113
I agree it is an admirable personal characteristic. But acting on emotions when it comes to criminal law is not wise nor good for society. Or civil law. Just ask any guy who has gone through a divorce! lol
 

Ridgeman08

50 Shades of AJ
Nov 28, 2008
4,495
2
38
This thread explains why there are no many lawyer jokes....

One of many:

A man who was having heart trouble went to the doctor to see what his options were. Naturally, the doctor recommended a heart transplant. The man reluctantly agreed, and asked if there were any hearts immediately available, considering that money was no object. "I do have three hearts," said the doctor. "The first is from an 18-year old** kid, nonsmoker, athletic, swimmer, with a great diet. He hit his head on the swimming pool and died. It's $100,000. The second is from a marathon runner,** 24 years old, great condition, very strong. He got hit by a bus. It's $150,000. The third is from a heavy drinker, cigar smoker, and a steak lover. It's $500,000." "Hey, why is that heart so expensive? He lived a terrible life!" "Yeah, but it's from a lawyer and never been used."

The problem with our legal system is lawyers. It could use a little more heart, to avoid very unfortunate situations like this... IMHO.
 
Last edited:

jackson11

New member
Jun 6, 2010
486
0
0
And it is her fault that the system let itself be fucked by her?
If the cops were not incompetent and the Crown wasn't useless then she would probably still be in prison where she belongs.
But they fucked up, she got a good deal... you can't blame her for jumping at it.
People will do whatever they need to do when it comes to self-preservation... of course she is going to lie and try to play the victim to get a lesser sentence... it happens all the time... this time it worked. That isn't her fault, and it sure as hell isn't the fault of her children.
Yes it was her fault. It had nothing to do with the "competence" of the police or the Crown......you either choose to ignore or can't seem to understand she fucked the system over and lied. It had nothing to do with the police investigation her lawyers took evidence from the crime scene and hid it until they could cut a deal. Holmoka clearly knew how involved she was but lied and said she did it for her own gain.

And yes we can blame her for "jumping at" the deal she got....it was not the Crowns fault or the police's fault they offered the deal....she created the situation by hiding evidence and lying. Had the tapes been passed to the Crown they would never have offered the deal they did

And sure people do what is needed for their own self preservation....if that is your stance then you can't be upset that people react and want her out of their town for their (and their children's) self preservation. You can't expect someone to have sympathy for a lying cunt of a woman but be upset that others want the same self preservation. Your view point seems very hypocritical. You seem to be saying that it is OK that Holmoka fucked the system or society over for her own gain by not following "society's rules" but it is not OK that the people that have to live with her are outing her and not leaving her alone or in other words they are breaking "society's rules". If you think it is OK for Holmoka to break rules for her own gain then you can't be upset that others will do the same.

And again I don't mention her children. They are innocent and should be left out of things. Best thing that could happen for the children (in my opinion) would be if their mother died and they went to live with a relative.

Holmoka is a lying maniuplating cunt that deserves to be put in a jail cell for life just like Bernardo....what you don't seem to get is that didn't happen not because of the Crown or police but because she is a lying manipulating cunt that cheated the system.
 

SchlongConery

License to Shill
Jan 28, 2013
12,868
6,338
113
Yes it was her fault. It had nothing to do with the "competence" of the police or the Crown......you either choose to ignore or can't seem to understand she fucked the system over and lied. It had nothing to do with the police investigation her lawyers took evidence from the crime scene and hid it until they could cut a deal. Holmoka clearly knew how involved she was but lied and said she did it for her own gain.

And yes we can blame her for "jumping at" the deal she got....it was not the Crowns fault or the police's fault they offered the deal....she created the situation by hiding evidence and lying. Had the tapes been passed to the Crown they would never have offered the deal they did

And sure people do what is needed for their own self preservation....if that is your stance then you can't be upset that people react and want her out of their town for their (and their children's) self preservation. You can't expect someone to have sympathy for a lying cunt of a woman but be upset that others want the same self preservation. Your view point seems very hypocritical. You seem to be saying that it is OK that Holmoka fucked the system or society over for her own gain by not following "society's rules" but it is not OK that the people that have to live with her are outing her and not leaving her alone or in other words they are breaking "society's rules". If you think it is OK for Holmoka to break rules for her own gain then you can't be upset that others will do the same.

And again I don't mention her children. They are innocent and should be left out of things. Best thing that could happen for the children (in my opinion) would be if their mother died and they went to live with a relative.

Holmoka is a lying maniuplating cunt that deserves to be put in a jail cell for life just like Bernardo....what you don't seem to get is that didn't happen not because of the Crown or police but because she is a lying manipulating cunt that cheated the system.


Ahem.

The basic premise of your argument is ill-founded and proves how little you know about the case.

Homolka's lawyer did not retrieve and withhold the tapes.
 

huckfinn

Banned from schools.....
Aug 16, 2011
2,505
113
63
On the Credit River with Jim
This is a good article on her, and the risk of her re-offending.....

http://montreal.ctvnews.ca/balancing-karla-homolka-s-rights-and-the-public-s-right-to-know-1.2868383

“What we found is that women who have been detected and sanctioned for a sexual crime like the case we're talking about now- the odds that they're going to commit a new sexual crimes is incredibly small,” said Franca Cortoni of the Université de Montréal. The data, she said, shows only 1.5 per cent will commit a new sexual crime."
 

huckfinn

Banned from schools.....
Aug 16, 2011
2,505
113
63
On the Credit River with Jim
How chilling that she’s again using the name Leanne Teale. Homolka and Bernardo legally changed their names to Leanne and Paul Jason Teale, taken from a movie about a serial killer.
I find this very disturbing......almost like she is clinging to her past.
The information I made this comment on was incorrect....she used the name Leanne Bordelais, so I withdraw my comment.

The troubling thing now is, The Star published both articles citing two different pieces of information.......
 

Butler1000

Well-known member
Oct 31, 2011
30,310
4,499
113
Ahem.

The basic premise of your argument is ill-founded and proves how little you know about the case.

Homolka's lawyer did not retrieve and withhold the tapes.
Actually I believe he did. In fact from an access point in the kitchen ceiling to either the attic or a space inbetween. That's where they were hidden and the cops missed them in the search.
 
Ashley Madison
Toronto Escorts