Homolka cut a deal with incompetent law enforcement and the crown not with the Canadian public. Therefore Homolka finds herself out from behind bars but ultimately serving a life sentence of a different kind brought to her by the public as there are many forms of justice and punishment in this world. It should have dawned on her that if she decided to reproduce in Canada that her progency would inherit extraordinary problems. Where is she going to run to next?
Holmolka Alive And Well Living in Quebec
- Thread starter reaper29
- Start date
You see Schlong- You DO get it! I completely and wholeheartedly agree with you on this point! Which is EXACTLY why, I think heinous criminals like Karla belong behind bars for the rest of their natural life. Keep them off the streets to cause harm to any more unsuspecting innocent children young girls!
Don't do the crime, if you can't do the time. She gets no sympathy from me. She brought this all onto herself.
Karla Homolka cunning in her manipulations
Rosie DiManno
April 21th 2016
There are some 40,000 individuals on Canada’s sex offender registry.
Karla Homolka isn’t among them.
The federal registry was created in 2004 and strengthened seven years later so that all sex offenders would be placed in the data bank immediately, not only when the Crown requested it and a judge made the order.
But Homolka committed her crimes in the early ’90s and the registry isn’t retroactive.
In any event, the schoolgirl killer was never convicted of a sex crime. She pleaded out — that notorious “deal with the devil” — to manslaughter in the slaying of 14-year-old Leslie Mahaffy and 15-year-old Kristen French, and acknowledged her role in the drug-rape of younger sister
Tammy, who choked to death during the assault.
Homolka received a 12-year negotiated sentence. No extra prison time was added for Tammy when sex videos subsequently surfaced of Homolka violating her unconscious sibling. No extra prison time was added for Homolka’s participation in the drug-rape of another teenager, Jane Doe, an assault she didn’t originally disclose.
Collectively, these were the worst sex crimes — at least the most shocking, the most incensing — in Canadian history.
Homolka is a serial sex killer, cloaked inside the legal distinction of manslaughter.
Yet we can’t touch her, can’t know when she moves into our neighbourhood, can’t take any steps to protect children from a woman who has always traded on her intensely sexualized compulsions — when she was destroying lives with Bernardo, when she was out on bail and trolling bars, and when she was behind bars.
The over-arcing motif of Homolka’s life has been sexual deviancy. It’s what made her a willing accomplice to Bernardo, her procuring of victims and flat disaffectedness to their suffering. Even with her husband out of the picture, she preyed. And, abetted by lawyers, she connived for her sweetheart deal.
Homolka was always and manifestly the smarter of the two monsters. Book-smart and intuitively smart. Her nuanced performance as main Crown witness against Bernardo — 17 days on the stand — demonstrated how adeptly she could dodge and rebuff the volleys of the best criminal legalists in the business. Bernardo’s lawyers got nowhere with her. She was like an anvil, blunting every strike.
Whether psychopath or sociopath, Homolka is the red warning strobe that keeps on flashing.
We knew, from a bizarre tangent of the 2014 Luke Magnotta murder trial, that Homolka was back in Quebec, where she’d spent most of her soft time. That she’d returned from Guadeloupe with her husband — brother of Homolka’s lawyer during the inmate’s 2005 hearing on release restrictions — and their three young children.
Dozens of restrictions imposed, all of them withdrawn by the court within mere months of Homolka completing her entire sentence. Also a clever decision, that, to abandon her earlier bid for statutory release after serving two-thirds of the sentence. Full time essentially put Homolka beyond the monitoring reach of corrections and parole officials.
Only this week did we discover precisely where Homolka and her family are living — the Montreal suburb of Chateauguay.
How rich that Homolka called the cops when reporters descended on the house.
How chilling that she’s again using the name Leanne Teale. Homolka and Bernardo legally changed their names to Leanne and Paul Jason Teale, taken from a movie about a serial killer.
She clearly hasn’t relinquished all the symbolic connections to her ex-husband and their merciless crime spree.
And advocates for rehabilitation demand mercy for her now? Because she’s a hounded mother who hasn’t reoffended?
It isn’t simple malice or implacability that has stirred outrage in Chateauguay. These aren’t not-in-my-backyard pitchfork heavers. They’re parents who have good reason to be leery of exposing their kids, especially their teenage daughters, to a known hebephile.
She may never again lick her fingers and jab them into an unconscious adolescent’s vagina or lure a teenage girl into a car by asking for directions or compel abductees to play dress-up or ignore their beseeching for help or stash a body in the basement while entertaining guests upstairs. But Homolka has done all these things. Because the why is beyond knowing, so is the why-not-again.
The felon has superficially transformed herself into soccer mom. But she’s powerfully manipulative and shrewd. Nobody really has a clue what proclivities reside in that twisted personality.
Of course the residents of Chateauguay are distressed and angry. And what does Homolka’s husband say to them? Move, if you don’t like it. That’s what he told La Presse.
The couple’s disregard is withering.
Are parents to accept that motherhood has changed Homolka’s miscreant DNA, even as they profess pity for her children because none of this is their fault and they don’t deserve shunning? Had Homolka and her husband put those children first, they would never have returned to a country where mom’s past was bound to catch up with her.
Spare the children, yes. But Homolka never spared the children of others, not even her own mother’s baby girl.
Do you think she’s had “the talk” yet with her kids? Information they can find with one click on the Internet after some classmate brings the gossip to school.
Gather ’round children and let me tell you a story, about a bad woman who did terrible things.
That’s mummy.
http://www.thestar.com/news/gta/2016/04/21/karla-homolka-cunning-in-her-manipulations-dimanno.html
Rosie DiManno
April 21th 2016
There are some 40,000 individuals on Canada’s sex offender registry.
Karla Homolka isn’t among them.
The federal registry was created in 2004 and strengthened seven years later so that all sex offenders would be placed in the data bank immediately, not only when the Crown requested it and a judge made the order.
But Homolka committed her crimes in the early ’90s and the registry isn’t retroactive.
In any event, the schoolgirl killer was never convicted of a sex crime. She pleaded out — that notorious “deal with the devil” — to manslaughter in the slaying of 14-year-old Leslie Mahaffy and 15-year-old Kristen French, and acknowledged her role in the drug-rape of younger sister
Tammy, who choked to death during the assault.
Homolka received a 12-year negotiated sentence. No extra prison time was added for Tammy when sex videos subsequently surfaced of Homolka violating her unconscious sibling. No extra prison time was added for Homolka’s participation in the drug-rape of another teenager, Jane Doe, an assault she didn’t originally disclose.
Collectively, these were the worst sex crimes — at least the most shocking, the most incensing — in Canadian history.
Homolka is a serial sex killer, cloaked inside the legal distinction of manslaughter.
Yet we can’t touch her, can’t know when she moves into our neighbourhood, can’t take any steps to protect children from a woman who has always traded on her intensely sexualized compulsions — when she was destroying lives with Bernardo, when she was out on bail and trolling bars, and when she was behind bars.
The over-arcing motif of Homolka’s life has been sexual deviancy. It’s what made her a willing accomplice to Bernardo, her procuring of victims and flat disaffectedness to their suffering. Even with her husband out of the picture, she preyed. And, abetted by lawyers, she connived for her sweetheart deal.
Homolka was always and manifestly the smarter of the two monsters. Book-smart and intuitively smart. Her nuanced performance as main Crown witness against Bernardo — 17 days on the stand — demonstrated how adeptly she could dodge and rebuff the volleys of the best criminal legalists in the business. Bernardo’s lawyers got nowhere with her. She was like an anvil, blunting every strike.
Whether psychopath or sociopath, Homolka is the red warning strobe that keeps on flashing.
We knew, from a bizarre tangent of the 2014 Luke Magnotta murder trial, that Homolka was back in Quebec, where she’d spent most of her soft time. That she’d returned from Guadeloupe with her husband — brother of Homolka’s lawyer during the inmate’s 2005 hearing on release restrictions — and their three young children.
Dozens of restrictions imposed, all of them withdrawn by the court within mere months of Homolka completing her entire sentence. Also a clever decision, that, to abandon her earlier bid for statutory release after serving two-thirds of the sentence. Full time essentially put Homolka beyond the monitoring reach of corrections and parole officials.
Only this week did we discover precisely where Homolka and her family are living — the Montreal suburb of Chateauguay.
How rich that Homolka called the cops when reporters descended on the house.
How chilling that she’s again using the name Leanne Teale. Homolka and Bernardo legally changed their names to Leanne and Paul Jason Teale, taken from a movie about a serial killer.
She clearly hasn’t relinquished all the symbolic connections to her ex-husband and their merciless crime spree.
And advocates for rehabilitation demand mercy for her now? Because she’s a hounded mother who hasn’t reoffended?
It isn’t simple malice or implacability that has stirred outrage in Chateauguay. These aren’t not-in-my-backyard pitchfork heavers. They’re parents who have good reason to be leery of exposing their kids, especially their teenage daughters, to a known hebephile.
She may never again lick her fingers and jab them into an unconscious adolescent’s vagina or lure a teenage girl into a car by asking for directions or compel abductees to play dress-up or ignore their beseeching for help or stash a body in the basement while entertaining guests upstairs. But Homolka has done all these things. Because the why is beyond knowing, so is the why-not-again.
The felon has superficially transformed herself into soccer mom. But she’s powerfully manipulative and shrewd. Nobody really has a clue what proclivities reside in that twisted personality.
Of course the residents of Chateauguay are distressed and angry. And what does Homolka’s husband say to them? Move, if you don’t like it. That’s what he told La Presse.
The couple’s disregard is withering.
Are parents to accept that motherhood has changed Homolka’s miscreant DNA, even as they profess pity for her children because none of this is their fault and they don’t deserve shunning? Had Homolka and her husband put those children first, they would never have returned to a country where mom’s past was bound to catch up with her.
Spare the children, yes. But Homolka never spared the children of others, not even her own mother’s baby girl.
Do you think she’s had “the talk” yet with her kids? Information they can find with one click on the Internet after some classmate brings the gossip to school.
Gather ’round children and let me tell you a story, about a bad woman who did terrible things.
That’s mummy.
http://www.thestar.com/news/gta/2016/04/21/karla-homolka-cunning-in-her-manipulations-dimanno.html
You are, (of course) aware of that fact that this entire "story" was bullshit, right?!
And once that was discovered, all bets should have been off... and yet they weren't.
THIS is why the public are so incensed by this monster. She duped her lawyers, the media, the public, and the entire legal system in order to get that deal...
Alot of people are on that list for bullshit minor stuff. I don't support this bullshit sex offender registeries. I've heard so many stories of people being put on it that should never have been on it.
And it makes it a nightmare to rehabiliate people, too, when they have virtual scarlett letter burned into their forehead.
And it makes it a nightmare to rehabiliate people, too, when they have virtual scarlett letter burned into their forehead.
Personally, I have absolutely no sympathy for whatever happens to Homolka regardless of whether she struck a legitimate deal or not, or served her time or not. For what she did as either a willing or unwilling participant she can rot in hell IMHO.
I do, however, feel for the children born to this monster - they are the innocent victims along with the young girls who were savagely raped and murdered.
I do, however, feel for the children born to this monster - they are the innocent victims along with the young girls who were savagely raped and murdered.
I know.
And even though it looks like I am defending her, and to a degree I am... I probably wouldn't want her in my area... but ya, they need to live somewhere. AND, she has done nothing to suggest that she is a threat anymore.
WTF? Do you really think that throwing someone in jail for a few years will change the warped and twisted mind of someone like her? And just because she hasn't done anything that we know of or heard of that she's going to be on her best behaviour and not commit another crime? Would you let your children sleep over at her place? You even state that you probably wouldn't want her in your area. Your logic is totally flawed.
Haryass may have no regard for our legal system but the lovely lady in question has no regard for human life . I think she should have to live with her terrible crimes for the rest of her life and I'm guessing she doesn't have much of a conscience so a friendly reminder shouldn't hurt . I'm wondering if someone with her history should be allowed to raise children ???
The legal system ain't perfect and it does make the rare error, like for Holmolka. Sad to see your defending an obvious murderer and have no regard for the innocent victims (three girls).
agree with the second part of your sentence but "lovely lady"??? Try "manipulative bitch".
OK, so we are jumping from "she needs to live somewhere" to "would you let your children sleep over at her place?"
I think it is YOUR logic that is flawed.
So the fact that she has served her time and should be left alone to raise her INNOCENT children means I have no regard for the victims?
You have no idea what you are talking about... you are letting yourself get blinded by emotion.
