You think their might have been bruises???
What if their broke the law??? Then what???? :beguiled:
Trump Manager Charged, then not charged
- Thread starter slowandeasy
- Start date
What if their broke the law??? Then what???? :beguiled:
This case had nothing whatever to do with trespass, at all, in any way. The grounds the DA gave for closing the case apply in any place and have nothing to do with private property rights. At all. You are just making shit up.Fuji. It is related to trespass. There is generally a section in any trespass acts involving what in Ontario they call "committing a prohibited act on the premises".
That aside from the fact that lewandowski was not even remotely connected to the property owner.
Except Trump is not the landlord and US campaign law prohibits Trump from mixing his business operations with his business operations ever if Trump were the landlord, which Trump is not.And Lewendowski as an employee of Trump(an in Ontario say is also deemed an agent of the LandLord)
You are again just MAKING THIS UP.
The DA said no such thing. You are LYING.That's what I stated and that's what the DA confirmed.
That is unmitigated BULLSHIT. He did not get exonerated, he simply had the charges dropped. Do you completely gain at basic civics?He did nothing wrong, she did do something wrong, and he gets exonerated as a result.
And Fields did absolutely nothing wrong whatsoever. In she has been completely vindicated by the same statement with the DA which described any contact she had with Trump as ACCIDENTAL.
You really are just lying now. You you can rewrite what the DA said, make up laws that don't even exist, invent ownership structures for the resort that have no connection to reality.
No, technically, they haven't. Stop making shit up.As for the ones who left peacefully you are incorrect. Technically they committed a prohibited act on the premises
Absolutely false. Just stop inventing your own laws.and all could have been issued tickets under what ever the act is called in the jurisdiction.
No it isn't.But it's at the discretion of the city owner or the lease holder or renter.
No such warning has EVER been issued by a US court.Generally a warning is given first so as not to waste the courts time.
In Florida law, a landlord can warn someone to leave a property, and an individual is only guilty of trespassing if they don't leave.
You are just wholesale LYING in most of your post.
Please write a letter to Google requesting that they improve their predictive text algorithm. I would be especially grateful if you can get them to stop putting "is" where I swiped "of", "add" where I swiped "as", "summer " where I swiped "some", " u" where i swiped "i", "world" where I swiped "would ", among many other frustrations.You think their might have been???
Hey fuji, their and their..............................and their??????
What if their broke the law??? Then what????
Is their of summer way you can get action in this matter u world appreciate it!
Sorry fuji. I know you want to think you understand how these thing work. But you don't.
I'm sorry your so upset you need to use hysterical and foul language because your points have been systematically refuted. Don't worry I don't see the need to do any reports on the post. I'm sure you will calm down at some point. Perhaps enough to be able to step back and look at this objectively.
Anyway I've proven the point and you are now having to resort to belligerent accusations so I'll leave the thread as is. The readers can see who is right(me I case you go back to reread this objectively) and I would prefer to walk away on the high road.
Have a good one.
I'm sorry your so upset you need to use hysterical and foul language because your points have been systematically refuted. Don't worry I don't see the need to do any reports on the post. I'm sure you will calm down at some point. Perhaps enough to be able to step back and look at this objectively.
Anyway I've proven the point and you are now having to resort to belligerent accusations so I'll leave the thread as is. The readers can see who is right(me I case you go back to reread this objectively) and I would prefer to walk away on the high road.
Have a good one.
Sorry Butler but your posts were pure bullshit made up by you and in anyone's books that's lying. You got caught making things up, now you are throwing your toys out of the pram.Sorry fuji. I know you want to think you understand how these thing work. But you don't.
Here are three of your lies:
You LIED about the DA citing the trespass law. The video from the DA is online for all to see and it's plain fact that no mention whatsoever was made of trespass.
You LIED that it's even applicable here, inventing all on your own the imaginary fantasy that lewandowski could ever be considered an agent for the landlord, when Trump himself isn't even the landlord, and even if he were, the Chinese wall between his personal business and the campaign would utterly prevent any consideration of a campaign worker as a Trump business employee.
You LIED about the nature of trespass law. I don't know what jurisdiction you were thinking of but neither Ontario nor Florida allow the use of force against trespassers OTHER THAN to remove those who refused to leave after being warned to leave. The Florida trespass law is online, you can easily verify that.
Have a nice day and next time don't lie.
P.S., if you don't like hearing the word "bullshit" there's an easy solution: stop making things up.
No, they did not corroborate anything fuji.Actually the DA confirmed their was violence and corroborated that it resulted in bruises
All the DA had to go by was a photo of ALLEGED bruises and miss Fields word. Thats all. They had no more information then we had. Stop acting like the DA had some type of secret knowledge. They did not!
Do you see any irony in this post??P.S., if you don't like hearing the word "bullshit" there's an easy solution: stop making things up
Everyone with eyes can see that they did.No, they did not corroborate anything fuji.
You might wanna look up the definition of "corroboration"Everyone with eyes can see that they did
Here's what the DA did: they validated every part of Field's story, confirming that she was grabbed by Lewandowski, and that she suffered bruises as a result. It's clearly there in the video statement.You might wanna look up the definition of "corroboration"
While you're looking up the word "corroboration" you might wanna look up "validation" as wellHere's what the DA did: they validated every part of Field's story, confirming that she was grabbed by Lewandowski, and that she suffered bruises as a result. It's clearly there in the video statement
The DA reviewed the evidence and corroborated, validated, confirmed, agreed with, and stated that Michelle Field's account was accurate. They totally vindicated her and determined that her statement was truthful.While you're looking up the word "corroboration" you might wanna look up "validation" as well
Lewandowski on the other hand was found to have lied.
They didnt validate anything, they merely presented alleged evidence.Here's what the DA did: they validated every part of Field's story
Its up to the courts and a jury to "validate" whether or not the evidence is true or not
After carefully reviewing the evidence the DA wholly concurred with Field's version of events, while concluding that Lewandowski lied.They didnt validate anything, they merely presented alleged evidence.
Its up to the courts and a jury to "validate" whether or not the evidence is true or not
Do you have video (or a link) of that exact statement??After carefully reviewing the evidence the DA wholly concurred with Field's version of events, while concluding that Lewandowski lied
Thanks in advance
LOl. Fuji since you are a shill for this woman, can you tell us if she provides us with GFE service?The DA reviewed the evidence and corroborated, validated, confirmed, agreed with, and stated that Michelle Field's account was accurate. They totally vindicated her and determined that her statement was truthful.
Lewandowski on the other hand was found to have lied.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eMYkuz3FzSIDo you have video (or a link) of that exact statement??
Thanks in advance
Which exact part of the video are you referring to?? Timestamp please
I'm at work now, if you want specific timestamps I can find them later but I want a commitment from you that when I do you will concede that Fields account was accurate while lewandowski lied.Which exact part of the video are you referring to?? Timestamp please
That said they discuss throughout the video how he grabbed her, and the evidence that have that it left her with bruises. You won't have any trouble finding it yourself and I highly recommend you watch the whole video.
LOL I would stay FAR away from her. One bad look and she might claim a rape charge.LOl. Fuji since you are a shill for this woman, can you tell us if she provides us with GFE service?
Just post the timestamp please. I have a feeling it doesnt exist, or the DA didnt say it in the exact words you claim he said it.I'm at work now, if you want specific timestamps I can find them later but I want a commitment from you that when I do you will concede that Fields account was accurate while lewandowski lied
And this was your exact quote:
After carefully reviewing the evidence the DA wholly concurred with Field's version of events, while concluding that Lewandowski lied
