Netanyahoo - Israel will never return Golan Heights.....

fuji

Banned
Jan 31, 2005
80,010
8
0
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
is.gd
The artillery argument has been long obsoleted by technology. Its just a land grab.
Nonsense. High ground remains strategic, particularly when it effectively controls Israel's water supply. No way is Israel going to allow an Arab military there. It will never happen.
 

fuji

Banned
Jan 31, 2005
80,010
8
0
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
is.gd
Not all meaning ?? 90% as it turns out. Nice to try and under state that. lol. Funny how you are all cozy with this yet in Crimea over 90% accepted and you are all wound up about Putins "imperialism." lol
Israeli citizenship has been offered to all, and they enjoy the full protection, privileges, and services extended to anyone in Israel regardless of whether they accepted the offer of citizenship.
 

basketcase

Well-known member
Dec 29, 2005
62,323
6,983
113
Actually, I applaud Israel's offer to Golan Arabs but you didn't answer my question why Israel didn't expand it to West Bank palestinians ? Probably because 20 000 Golan Arabs don't represent a demographic threat to the Jewishness of the state ?
Or more likely because the Golan doesn't claim to be an independent state. Meanwhile West Bank Palestinians want their own state and overwhelmingly reject being Israeli.
 

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
94,595
23,909
113
Or more likely because the Golan doesn't claim to be an independent state. Meanwhile West Bank Palestinians want their own state and overwhelmingly reject being Israeli.
So does the rest of the world.
Its only Israel that's stopping them.
 

fuji

Banned
Jan 31, 2005
80,010
8
0
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
is.gd
So does the rest of the world.
Its only Israel that's stopping them.
Actually what is stopping them from having a state is their racist hate war against Jews. If they would give up on the idea of ethnically cleansing the Jews from Israel they would have had a state in 1947, or really any year since.
 
Last edited:

basketcase

Well-known member
Dec 29, 2005
62,323
6,983
113
So does the rest of the world.
Its only Israel that's stopping them.
Yep, Hamas terrorists openly refusing to make peace as long as Israel is on any of historic Palestine has nothing to do with it.

Of course you refuse to address that Palestinians overwhelmingly reject a One State solution.
 

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
94,595
23,909
113
Yep, Hamas terrorists openly refusing to make peace as long as Israel is on any of historic Palestine has nothing to do with it.

Of course you refuse to address that Palestinians overwhelmingly reject a One State solution.
Still lying about Hamas quotes to justify refusing to discuss peace?
Sad.

I'm sure that Palestinians do totally reject the apartheid one state solution you back.
 

fuji

Banned
Jan 31, 2005
80,010
8
0
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
is.gd
Still lying about Hamas quotes to justify refusing to discuss peace?
Sad.

I'm sure that Palestinians do totally reject the apartheid one state solution you back.
You are the only one lying about the Hamas quote. It's crystal clear. You are also lying about Israel being apartheid.

All you do is lie.
 

fuji

Banned
Jan 31, 2005
80,010
8
0
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
is.gd
They also maintain that Hamas are terrorists and that Israel isn't Palestine.

Meanwhile Canada has this to say about you:

"That, given Canada and Israel share a long history of friendship as well as economic and diplomatic relations, the House reject the Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions (BDS) movement, which promotes the demonization and delegitimization of the State of Israel, and call upon the government to condemn any and all attempts by Canadian organizations, groups or individuals to promote the BDS movement, both here at home and abroad."
 

gryfin

New member
Aug 30, 2001
9,632
0
0
They also maintain that Hamas are terrorists and that Israel isn't Palestine.

Meanwhile Canada has this to say about you:

"That, given Canada and Israel share a long history of friendship as well as economic and diplomatic relations, the House reject the Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions (BDS) movement, which promotes the demonization and delegitimization of the State of Israel, and call upon the government to condemn any and all attempts by Canadian organizations, groups or individuals to promote the BDS movement, both here at home and abroad."
You mean the Opposition Motion. Not Canadian policy.

Now, the Canadian government says the Israel is violation the Geneva Convention. Do you agree with your government and your fellow Canadians?
 

fuji

Banned
Jan 31, 2005
80,010
8
0
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
is.gd
It's actually Canadian policy, it's a position strongly held on both sides of the aisle with broad bipartisan support. Even the NDP chimed in to denounce BDS in speeches to Parliament.

You are just going to look silly disputing it.
 

gryfin

New member
Aug 30, 2001
9,632
0
0
It's actually Canadian policy, it's a position strongly held on both sides of the aisle with broad bipartisan support. Even the NDP chimed in to denounce BDS in speeches to Parliament.

You are just going to look silly disputing it.
Unfortunately it says "Opposition Motion" in your own link. That's got to be embarrassing.

'42nd Parliament, 1st Session - Sitting No. 22 - February 22, 2016
Opposition Motion (Israel)'

Ouch!
 

fuji

Banned
Jan 31, 2005
80,010
8
0
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
is.gd
Keep squirming. That motion has the full throated support of a supermajority of MP's.

You have lost the debate, not only here on terb, but nationally. Your tactic of constantly demonizing Israel was noticed not only here on terb, but broadly denounced by the Canadian Parliament.

You lost.
 

gryfin

New member
Aug 30, 2001
9,632
0
0
Keep squirming. That motion has the full throated support of a supermajority of MP's.

You have lost the debate, not only here on terb, but nationally. Your tactic of constantly demonizing Israel was noticed not only here on terb, but broadly denounced by the Canadian Parliament.

You lost.
Oooh...you are backtracking fast. Now it's just "broadly denounced by the Canadian Parliament". You are slowly reconciling yourself to the fact that it's only an Opposition Motion.

Let me help you one more time:

'42nd Parliament, 1st Session - Sitting No. 22 - February 22, 2016
Opposition Motion (Israel)'

Ouch!
 

nottyboi

Well-known member
May 14, 2008
23,680
2,142
113
Nonsense. High ground remains strategic, particularly when it effectively controls Israel's water supply. No way is Israel going to allow an Arab military there. It will never happen.
Syria could poison Israels water supply tomorrow if they decided to. To think otherwise is childish nonsense. It will just take a GPS guided rocket to shower the area with some sort of biological agent.
 

nottyboi

Well-known member
May 14, 2008
23,680
2,142
113
Israeli citizenship has been offered to all, and they enjoy the full protection, privileges, and services extended to anyone in Israel regardless of whether they accepted the offer of citizenship.
90% have declined it which means they prefer to be Syrian citizen then Israeli citizens... and therefore they are essentially prisoners of an occupying force.
 
Toronto Escorts