On Climate change

[nervcity]

Blah blah blah blah blah.
Guess what? your shitty opinions on climate change aren't based on your unique or superior understanding of the science, or which fucking blogs you subscribe to. They are a reflection of your political views and therefore belong in the politics sub forum. Lets leave em there.

Edit: https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...-of-climate-change-is-all-about-the-politics/

 

[shack]

You forgot an option for the poll.

3) If you see a thread dealing with climate don't read it.

 

[nervcity]

i try shack, I try.

 

[shack]

i try shack, I try...

...but sometimes you are like a deer caught in the headlights.

 

[Moviefan-2]

I voted yes, as the proposal makes a lot of sense to me.

Climate change is all about politics, after all.

 

[Frankfooter]

I voted yes, as the proposal makes a lot of sense to me.

Climate change is all about politics, after all.

Climate change denial is all about politics.
http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/dark-money-funds-climate-change-denial-effort/

Climate change science is about science. The IPCC, for instance, is mandated to assess and summarize the global findings on climate change, not politics.
Its the opposite of politics.

 

[AK-47]

Franky now wants to debate global warming in a thread that complains about global warming threads

 

[canada-man]

 

[canada-man]

 

[Frankfooter]

Franky now wants to debate global warming in a thread that complains about global warming threads

What, was this thread only to be filled with deniers and their wacky claims and whining?
Moviefan came in, lied, I responded.
You need some realism, mr gun.

 

[Frankfooter]

https://rgsweather.files.wordpress.com/2013/03/earth-climate-history-and-co2-levels.png?w=580

Canada-man, you keep posting these charts as if they showed anything but your ignorance of climatology and the research that's been done.
You continue to claim that climatology doesn't address such basic questions, despite being shown wrong.

For instance, have you read the IPCC FAQ's on the matter?
Yes, these questions are so basic and asked often enough that they are included in the Frequently Asked Questions:
https://www.ipcc.ch/publications_and_data/ar4/wg1/en/faq-6-1.html
https://www.ipcc.ch/publications_and_data/ar4/wg1/en/faq-6-2.html
https://www.ipcc.ch/publications_and_data/ar4/wg1/en/ch6s6-6.html
https://www.ipcc.ch/publications_and_data/ar4/wg1/en/ch6s6-6-3.html

Please read those responses and then tell us what you think they missed or got wrong.

 

[OddSox]

Climate change denial is all about politics.
http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/dark-money-funds-climate-change-denial-effort/

Climate change science is about science. The IPCC, for instance, is mandated to assess and summarize the global findings on climate change, not politics.
Its the opposite of politics.

You should be a comedian.

 

[AK-47]

What, was this thread only to be filled with deniers and their wacky claims and whining?
Moviefan came in, lied, I responded.
You need some realism, mr gun

I just find it funny you're clogging up yet another thread with your global warming rhetoric :biggrin1:

 

[barnacler]

Franky now wants to debate global warming in a thread that complains about global warming threads

Shit, that's pretty good.

 

[barnacler]

Outlaw the words "climate" or "change" in any new post , or else this will be the results

New thread: I want to go to a warmer climate this winter: any ideas?

Response: Just wait, it will be warm enough in the arctic soon.

And off they go!

Or else:

I want to change my internet provider : any ideas?

Response: never mind, the climate is going to change so much that your internet provider will be the least of your worries...

 

[shack]

 

[Moviefan-2]

Climate change science is about science. The IPCC, for instance, is mandated to assess and summarize the global findings on climate change, not politics.
Its the opposite of politics.

You should be a comedian.

Indeed. That was hilarious. :biggrin1:

 

[Frankfooter]

Indeed. That was hilarious. :biggrin1:

Hey loser, you are the one who thinks wattsupwiththat is a better source then NASA, AAAS or the IPCC.
That is totally hilarious.

It's the bastardization of science by people with political agendas that upsets me.

Quite a different picture emerges when you actually look at the facts (which, of course, Franky never does).

http://wattsupwiththat.com/2015/12/...o-the-fbi-under-rico-and-wire-fraud-statutes/

I don't have any faith in NASA's numbers.

Clearly, you can't tell bullshit from science.
From a wattsupwiththat blog post from that wacko, Tim Ball. In which he tries to claim that those fighting climate change have a secret plot to take over the world.

Kyoto provided the basis for the financial agenda. Money needed to fund the single world government was a global carbon tax.

https://archive.is/2WaGg#selection-669.0-669.124

That, is what the idiot called moviefan thinks is a legit source.
Comedy cold.

 

[Twister]

For fucks sake YES .:ban:

 

[huckfinn]

Maybe another option on the poll could read;

"Please exchange email addresses and / or phone numbers and stop clogging TERB with this crap."